Re: Option to allow RANDOM SPAM through!
2009-10-13 by California_Condor
... I generally don t comment, instead reading the list to pick up when I need to make updates... d d, isn t the greylisting properly blocking the spam from
Messages
Browse messages
Page 38 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] [PATCH] loading dump includes tarpit entry is blocked
2009-10-13 by manu@netbsd.org
... I beleive it is not in the repository anymore: a fresh cvs checkout does not create it. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Option to allow RANDOM SPAM through!
2009-10-13 by manu@netbsd.org
... milter-greylist has GeoIP support (must be enabled at configure time), you might want to give it a try: racl block geoip br msg I do not speak to
Re: [milter-greylist] [PATCH] loading dump includes tarpit entry is blocked
2009-10-13 by Kouhei Sutou
Hi, In Re: [milter-greylist] [PATCH] loading dump includes tarpit entry is blocked on Sun, 11 Oct 2009 06:20:51
Re: Option to allow RANDOM SPAM through!
2009-10-12 by d d
... ##### Yahoo is not quoting properly. Anyway, I am calling clam from spamassassin. So this issue is resolved also with milter-greylist. If virii, tempfail.
Re: Option to allow RANDOM SPAM through!
2009-10-12 by d d
... Ralf, it was a rhetorical question :) Don t really care if there is an answer since deed is done!
Re: Option to allow RANDOM SPAM through!
2009-10-12 by d d
... I am not looking for the complete list. ... I blocked these subnets based on last 3 months logs. *All* of them are from Brasil with absolutely no single
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Option to allow RANDOM SPAM through!
2009-10-12 by Ralf Gebhart
... Not all of that is in Brazil, for example: 187.160/12 is routed to Mexico. And others will be routed to other South or Latin America countries, as those
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Option to allow RANDOM SPAM through!
2009-10-12 by Oliver Fromme
... That list is incomplete. Please have a look at this list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ It seems you want to block all LACNIC
Re: Option to allow RANDOM SPAM through!
2009-10-12 by d d
Dropping the following in firewall: 187.0.0.0/8 189.0.0.0/8 200.0.0.0/8 201.0.0.0/8 eliminated 80% of SPAM connections. I have no business in Brasil or from
Re: A less strict auto-whitelist?
2009-10-11 by d d
... That can be configurable by allowing entire domain. I checked some of my mails and that is not that common at all here. 63 senders checked, 2 have
Re: [milter-greylist] [PATCH] loading dump includes tarpit entry is blocked
2009-10-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Checked in, but autowhite.c does not exists anymore, IIRC. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
[PATCH] loading dump includes tarpit entry is blocked
2009-10-11 by Kouhei Sutou
Hi, I noticed that loading dump data that includes tarpit entry is blocked: main() - mg_init() - dump_reload() - PENDING_LOCK;
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: A less strict auto-whitelist?
2009-10-10 by Bob Friesenhahn
... Not easy. You might send an email to bashful@grumpy.com and the response comes from grumpy@bashful.com. This behavior seems quite common. There is a cost
Re: Option to allow RANDOM SPAM through!
2009-10-10 by d d
Okay, compat part got censored. In case someone wants to use, replace # with @ : Compat:me#my.dom me#my.dom 550 .... OFF IMPOSTOR From:me#my.dom OK
Option to allow RANDOM SPAM through!
2009-10-10 by d d
Could you please have an option to allow random SPAM through? Like 10% or every mondays! I feel so lonely now! 8: DELIVERED MAIL 4: RETURNED BACK AFTER
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: memory usage bug with mushroom cloud
2009-10-10 by Paul Venezia
An email larger than 5MB is in violation of the Geneva Conventions.
Re: A less strict auto-whitelist?
2009-10-10 by d d
... I am looking for the same thing. It doesn t matter which IP address the reply comes from. If I sent a message to someone, it means I am expecting a reply.
Re: memory usage bug with mushroom cloud
2009-10-10 by d d
... Jesus, 18GB mail??? Our server runs on a 9GB SCSI! I don t think MTAs and MUAs are coped to deal with that. I am sure something would timeout somewhere.
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... I do that too. Greylisting with reputation based delays is still a very effective spam filtering technique. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Oliver Fromme
... grep -c pre-greet /var/log/maillog Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister:
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Rick Knight
... Oliver, How are you collecting the statistic on greet_pause? Thanks, Rick
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Seth Mos
I d like to chime in on this discussion as well. I don t use any blacklists at work, greylisting only. I do use a urlcheck at work which checks the MX host DNS
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Bob Friesenhahn
... There is extreme benefit here as well: % grep Greylisting in action syslog* |wc -l 315079 % grep autowhitelisted for syslog* |wc -l 5300 My email
Re: Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by philippeake
Ok - I used the wrong stats here. What we really need to look for are the initial delay of an incoming message, which we get from: # grep Greylisting in
Re: [~Disarmed~] Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Eduardo Casarero
Eduardo Casarero Informatica Avanzada SRL e-mail. eduardo.casarero@informaticaavanzada.com.ar tel. +54-11-5235-3939 ext. 666 movil. +54-011-49372448 ... I my
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Vincent Rivellino
... Working good for me ... [var@cp1 tmp]$ zcat mx1-maillog.1.gz mx2-maillog.1.gz | sed -n s/^.*milter-greylist: .* from ] + ) to ] + ) delayed
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Oliver Fromme
For your amusement, here are the statistics from a very small sever of mine. :-) It s only hosting a few private domains. Numbers are from midnight to now,
RE: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Jason Bertoch
... True, it is logged even for the first attempt. ... An autowhitelisted entry occurs each time a host sends mail and for each recipient, so I think maybe we
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Jonas Israelsson
+1 grep Greylisting in action mail | wc -l 746855 grep autowhitelisted for mail | wc -l 7361 Rgds Jonas
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Paul Venezia
If you re using milter-greylist, delayed for will show all the tuples that didn t match extant autowhitelist entries or manual whitelist entries. Thus, the
RE: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Radovan Mzik
... it s not true, it s logged even for the first time. So there is no indication that the host retried if you are not checking the interval value in the
RE: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Jason Bertoch
... How is delayed for greater than autowhitelisted ? delayed for indicates a previously unseen host that was delayed but then retried. autowhitelisted
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Paul Venezia
Since my previous message to the list this morning has apparently been lost somewhere, yes: root@mx ~]# grep -c delayed for /var/log/maillog 23231 [root@mx
RE: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Jason Bertoch
... Do you have any stats to support this? Mine seem to agree with the OP. Jason A. Bertoch Network Administrator jason@electronet.net Electronet Broadband
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Fredrik Pettai
... Did you ever invest time to see how those spam mails actually where sent to your MX? If they are sent thru a valid mail relay, greylisting won t help
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Paul Venezia
[root@mx ~]# grep -c delayed for /var/log/maillog 23231 [root@mx ~]# grep -c autowhitelisted /var/log/maillog 658 ... and that s just today. Bot farms
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Joe Pruett
... you re misinterpreting the data. the delayed for shows for every attempt. try grepping for autowhitelisted for to see how many things retried
Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by philippeake
Very few spammers still used dedicated systems to send out their wares, most now use bot farms. This means that they will be sending via real MTAs, which will
Re: dkim-milter .spec file to build libraries
2009-09-30 by reschauzier
There seems to be no good way to directly link to the files in the milter-greylist group. Please choose the file dkim-milter.spec from the following directory:
Re: [milter-greylist] dkim-milter .spec file to build libraries
2009-09-29 by Bill Levering
I m getting file not found with the link provided below. Bill Levering idbill@planx.com KFP: 0C38 4D7E 5B50 94FE 992D 406D 6C81 DE33 5459 A1AC
Re: libpthread: Invalid condition variable
2009-09-29 by reschauzier
Just wondered if the introduction of store.c messed something up. It looks like it did. Thanks to Petar for catching and fixing!
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: libpthread: Invalid condition variable
2009-09-29 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Yes, it s all good. I just replied to Rudys follow-up.
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: libpthread: Invalid condition variable
2009-09-29 by manu@netbsd.org
... The fix is in the lastest release, isn t it? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
dkim-milter .spec file to build libraries
2009-09-29 by reschauzier
See link below for a .spec file to build dkim-milter with libraries. The file is based on the Fedora Extras package. It now includes an option ( buildlib ) to
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: libpthread: Invalid condition variable
2009-09-29 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Yes. ... I guess it depends on your local pthreads implementation. The NetBSD ... glibc OTOH doesn t care (see nptl/pthread_cond_init.c). Petar Bogdanovic
Re: libpthread: Invalid condition variable
2009-09-29 by reschauzier
Ah, I see. The problem is that mg_init() [and therefore dump_init()] is called _after_ conf_load() in main(). I am assuming that before the introduction of
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: libpthread: Invalid condition variable
2009-09-29 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Yes, this: ... Petar Bogdanovic
Re: libpthread: Invalid condition variable [1 Attachment]
2009-09-29 by reschauzier
I have been trying to wrap my head around this one for quite some time now. It sounds like moving dump_init() to mg_init() in store.c is what caused the
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.4 is available
2009-09-28 by Kouhei Sutou
Hi, In Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.4 is available on Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:32:57 +1100, ... Yes. But it