On Wed, October 7, 2009 09:46, philippeake wrote: > Very few spammers still used dedicated systems to send out their wares, > most now use bot farms. > > This means that they will be sending via real MTAs, which will retry. > > Looking at my logs over the last two days I see this: > > # grep "Greylisting in action" mail | wc -l > 1234 > # grep "delayed for" mail | wc -l > 1234 > > So every email delayed by greylisting was eventually re-sent and accepted. > > Most SPAM was blocked by RBLs, that which passed (the 1234 above) then > went on to SpamAssassin, which trashed around 1,210 of them as SPAM. > > Greylisting contributed ... zero. Working good for me ... [var@cp1 tmp]$ zcat mx1-maillog.1.gz mx2-maillog.1.gz | sed -n 's/^.*milter-greylist: .* from <\([^>]\+\)> to <\([^>]\+\)> delayed for.*$/\1:\2/p' | sort -u | wc -l 741 [var@cp1 tmp]$ zcat mx2-maillog.1.gz mx2-maillog.1.gz | sed -n 's/^.*milter-greylist: .* from <\([^>]\+\)> rcpt <\([^>]\+\)>: autowhitelisted for.*$/\1:\2/p' | sort -u | wc -l 65 Last week I had 741 unique from-addr/to-addr combinations that were greylisted, but only 65 unique from-addr/to-addr combinations that were autowhitelisted after the greylisting. FWIW - I only use one RBL (HostKarma's BL) to actually blacklist. I used other RBL's for varying lengths of greylisting.
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Vincent Rivellino
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.