Since my previous message to the list this morning has apparently been lost somewhere, yes: root@mx ~]# grep -c "delayed for" /var/log/maillog 23231 [root@mx ~]# grep -c "autowhitelisted" /var/log/maillog 658 ... and that's just today. Bot farms generally don't retry, dedicated spam relays do. I've manually blocked a few overseas /24s due to this, but otherwise, I let it run by itself. Make sure you're looking for the right data. -Paul On Oct 7, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Jason Bertoch wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com [mailto:milter- > > greylist@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Fredrik Pettai > > Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:05 AM > > To: milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid > technique? > > > > > > > > > > Looking at my logs over the last two days I see this: > > > > > > # grep "Greylisting in action" mail | wc -l > > > 1234 > > > # grep "delayed for" mail | wc -l > > > 1234 > > > > > > So every email delayed by greylisting was eventually re-sent and > > > accepted. > > > > > > > We use greylisting, and it's still very useful. > > Do you have any stats to support this? Mine seem to agree with the OP. > > Jason A. Bertoch > Network Administrator > jason@... > Electronet Broadband Communications > 3411 Capital Medical Blvd. > Tallahassee, FL 32308 > (V) 850.222.0229 (F) 850.222.8771 > > >
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Paul Venezia
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.