Ok - I used the wrong stats here. What we really need to look for are the initial delay of an incoming message, which we get from: # grep "Greylisting in action" mail | wc -l 1321 Then there are two possible subsequent events based upon that first rejection. 1) The email is re-sent, and it passes through with an added header indicating the delay. 2) Subsequent emails with the 3-tuple that matches will just sail through, these are the "autowhitelist" entries. Note that the ORIGINAL email is not an autowhitelist. We can get a count of the initial email retry, plus the autowhitelist emails thus: # egrep "X-Greylist: Delayed for|autowhitelisted" mail | wc -l 95 So - to answer my own question -- yes this is still a VERY valid technique. ------ I didn't look closely enough at the log data, the phrase "delayed for" occurs on every initial rejection, so its not surprising that those two counts were identical.
Message
Re: Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by philippeake
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.