Eduardo Casarero Informatica Avanzada SRL e-mail. eduardo.casarero@informaticaavanzada.com.ar tel. +54-11-5235-3939 ext. 666 movil. +54-011-49372448 ----- "Vincent Rivellino" <vince@...> wrote: > > > > On Wed, October 7, 2009 09:46, philippeake wrote: > > Very few spammers still used dedicated systems to send out their wares, > > most now use bot farms. > > > > This means that they will be sending via real MTAs, which will retry. > > > > Looking at my logs over the last two days I see this: > > > > # grep "Greylisting in action" mail | wc -l > > 1234 > > # grep "delayed for" mail | wc -l > > 1234 > > > > So every email delayed by greylisting was eventually re-sent and accepted. > > > > Most SPAM was blocked by RBLs, that which passed (the 1234 above) then > > went on to SpamAssassin, which trashed around 1,210 of them as SPAM. > > > > Greylisting contributed ... zero. > > Working good for me ... > > [var@cp1 tmp]$ zcat mx1-maillog.1.gz mx2-maillog.1.gz | sed -n > 's/^.*milter-greylist: .* from <\([^>]\+\)> to <\([^>]\+\)> delayed > for.*$/\1:\2/p' | sort -u | wc -l > 741 > [var@cp1 tmp]$ zcat mx2-maillog.1.gz mx2-maillog.1.gz | sed -n > 's/^.*milter-greylist: .* from <\([^>]\+\)> rcpt <\([^>]\+\)>: > autowhitelisted for.*$/\1:\2/p' | sort -u | wc -l > 65 > > Last week I had 741 unique from-addr/to-addr combinations that were > greylisted, but only 65 unique from-addr/to-addr combinations that were > autowhitelisted after the greylisting. > > FWIW - I only use one RBL (HostKarma's BL) to actually blacklist. I used > other RBL's for varying lengths of greylisting. > > I my stats doesnt separate greylisting rejects from unkwnown user but here they are: Since 2009-09-01 up to now: Rejections: 109.206.474 SPAM : 13.331.196 HAM: 7.289.974 I dont reject with rbl at MTA level, and greylisting takes more than 60% of rejections. So, yes, greylisting still do the job (at least in latin america). >
Message
Re: [~Disarmed~] Re: [milter-greylist] Is greylisting still a valid technique?
2009-10-07 by Eduardo Casarero
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.