Re: [milter-greylist] memory usage bug with mushroom cloud
2009-08-14 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... IIRC, if there is no DATA-stage ACL, the body is not looked at. ... Sure, please send it. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Messages
Browse messages
Page 40 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] memory usage bug with mushroom cloud
2009-08-14 by Christopher
Hello... ... cool! I would humbly recommend: 1: Have the code set maxpeek to some smaller default than unlimited under the Principle of least astonishment. I
Re: [milter-greylist] memory usage bug with mushroom cloud
2009-08-14 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... You want to look at the maxpeek configuration option. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
memory usage bug with mushroom cloud
2009-08-14 by Christopher
Hello... I recently updated milter-greylist from 2.1.12 (on a rhel3 server that had been working great for years) to 4.1.1 from EPEL on a new rhel5 server both
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.2.3 and 4.3.3 are available
2009-08-13 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Nice! -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.2.3 and 4.3.3 are available
2009-08-13 by Sebastian Wiesinger
... I just tried installing it, but it doesn t start up: Aug 13 22:53:24 alita sm-mta[1916]: n7DKrOkx001916: Milter (greylist): local socket name
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.2.3 and 4.3.3 are available
2009-08-13 by Bill Levering
wikidot has been updated with these links and the changelog updated Bill Levering idbill@planx.com KFP: 6C0A 067C 7E03 58C3 C2F7 8278 6DFD 55A8 108B ED2F
milter-greylist 4.2.3 and 4.3.3 are available
2009-08-13 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Hello Today I tracked down a nasty bug in the code that handle matching of properties obtained from LDAP or URLcheck. There was a lot of uninitialized
[PATCH] support normal user 'make install'
2009-08-04 by Kouhei Sutou
Hi, I noticed that we can t run make install as a normal user even when we specify --prefix=$HOME/local --with-conffile=$HOME/local/etc/mail/greylist.conf
Re: Author Domain Signing Practices (was: Re: [milter-greylist] DKIM field usage survey)
2009-07-26 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Sorry for the noise, ADSP seems to be nowhere yet: http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q1/011387.html
Author Domain Signing Practices (was: Re: [milter-greylist] DKIM field usage survey)
2009-07-26 by Petar Bogdanovic
... BTW, does the verifyer support ADSP? http://www.dkim.org/specs/draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-04.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Author_Domain_Signing_Practices
Re: [milter-greylist] DKIM field usage survey
2009-07-26 by Fredrik Pettai
... Somewhat late reply... but it works. Cannot say that I tested all possible scenarios, but Gmail verified ok for me. /P
Re: [milter-greylist] DKIM field usage survey [2 Attachments]
2009-07-20 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I implemented verifying in milter-greylist but never used. Anyone can confirm it works? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
DKIM field usage survey
2009-07-20 by Dave CROCKER
Folks, G day. One requirement for moving a specification from Proposed to Draft status is to supply an Implementation Report:
***SPAM*** (3.9) Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-18 by Rick Knight
Spam detection software, running on the system mail.rlknight.com , has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been
Re: [milter-greylist] racl greylist + dacl greylist
2009-07-14 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Yes: because greylisting tempfailed at RCPT stage, DATA-stage ACL are not evaluated. That one is consistent. ... You pass the RCPT-stage ACL and then you
racl greylist + dacl greylist
2009-07-14 by Adam Katz
Just a sanity check on two samples... # sample one: racl whitelist from dude@example.com racl greylist default delay 30m autowhite 5d dacl
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Patrick Domack
Port forwarding is what you want to use, but in your case, it s also has nat when using port forwarding. Sound like a config/setup issue, maybe update the
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Rick Knight
Yes, I can go back to the previous configuration. I was trying to cut down on some equipment and save a bit on power consumption by getting rid of the PC that
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... You said it stopped working: if it worked before, then you can go back to your previous configuration. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Rick Knight
So I need to NAT the SMTP traffic directly to the mail server, not using port forwarding, just NAT? I don t see a way to do that in my router. In fact, I have
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Ralf Gebhart
... Sorry, s/not/NAT/ ;-) -- Ralf Snake Gebhart
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Ralf Gebhart
... That s definitely your problem. You should change your firewall config to do really not and not port forwarding. eg. it has to keep the source address and
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Rick Knight
Yes, the firewall is between the mail server and the internet and does port forwarding. Looks just like you ve illustrated. I did change my firewall. I had
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Patrick Domack
It shouldn t appear connections are coming from the firewall, unless he is doing source masquerading on incoming connections, where he would of wanted to do,
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted" [1 Attachment]
2009-07-13 by Oliver Fromme
... It seems that your firewall (.2) is acting as an SMTP gateway (as opposed to only routing the IP packets). So your mailserver only sees the firewall as the
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Bill Levering
... _______________ If the firewall is between the mail server and the internet, then you should remove the whitelisting for the firewall but this would break
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Rick Knight
... Forgot to mention, 172.16.88.2 is the internal IP of my firewall, 172.16.88.3 is the mail server. Thanks, Rick
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Rick Knight
... Here are the Received: and X-Greylist: headers from another message and greylist.conf is attached. As I said, just about everything is passing through
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-13 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Um, sorry, I overlooked that one, my answer was meaningless. Can you send your greylist.conf and the Received: headers of the message that passed through?
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-12 by Rick Knight
... 172.16.88.3 is the internal address of my mail server.
Re: [milter-greylist] All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-12 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... 172.16.x.x is a RFC1918 reserved address for privates networks, You get spam relayed from a host in your internal, trusted network. You should either cure
All sender headers show "Sender IP Whitelisted"
2009-07-12 by rlkknight@sbcglobal.net
Over the last couple of days the amount of spam coming into our mailboxes has increased by at least 5 times. In trying to find the problem I see that every
Cheapest Dating Software on the internet
2009-07-09 by websoldatingsoftware
Cheapest Dating Software on the internet for more information visit www.websol-dating-software.com since the price is just $10 with lifetime upgrade, doesnt
Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-07 by Adam Katz
... Hrm, interesting; I thought that was per IP. ... Right, it doesn t predict the future. All it does is sum up the past. It s probably a safe assumption
Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-07 by Adam Katz
... Eh? Define rescue here... If we offer a tarpit action, it has to play well with the greylist action, even if you do not intend to use tarpitting (in
Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-07 by Bob Friesenhahn
... If you are talking about CONNECTION_RATE_THROTTLE, then this is just playing into the hands of someone who intends to cause DOS. By making the server more
Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-07 by Adam Katz
... If you don t have a hard connection rate throttle, you are correct. http://www.acme.com/mail_filtering/sendmail_config.html (as referenced in my previous
Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-07 by Bob Friesenhahn
... It seems like this makes your server susceptible to DOS. It also assumes that the bots are implemented well and will sever slow connections. Bob -- Bob
Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-07 by Kouhei Sutou
Hi, In Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey on Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:23:55 -0400, ... I want to rescue the servers by
Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-07 by Kouhei Sutou
Hi, In Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey on Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:21:56 +0000, ... It seems that I omitted
Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-06 by Adam Katz
I ve actually been eying tarpits for a while now, specifically leaders like MailChannels (which some high-volume colleagues of mine use, plus an award from the
Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-06 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... That does not make sense for milter-greylist ACL, as a negative result cause ACL processing to stop there. ... I think that what we need here is a new ACL
Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-06 by Kouhei Sutou
Hi, Thanks for your comment. In Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey on Sun, 5 Jul 2009 14:27:30 +0000, ...
Re: [milter-greylist] [PATCH] typos in acl_add_autowhite() [1 Attachment]
2009-07-05 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Yes it was. i fixed it in CVS. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] [RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-05 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... (...) ... And the new action be difficult to integrate with existing ACL. ... That one seems nicer, but could be imporved a bit. Milter-greylist actually
[RFC] implementing taRgrey
2009-07-05 by Kouhei Sutou
Hi, I want to implement taRgrey into milter-greylist. I want to hear comments about how should I implement it. = Background taRgrey is an anti-spam technique
[PATCH] typos in acl_add_autowhite()
2009-07-05 by Kouhei Sutou
Hi, I found typos in acl_add_autowhite(). It seems that they are produced by copy & paste. Thanks, -- kou
Re: [milter-greylist] Off by one in milter-greylist.c
2009-06-29 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Thank you for the fix. It s odd I never experienced that bug. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Off by one in milter-greylist.c
2009-06-28 by Pascal Lalonde
Hello, I hit a bug while running milter-greylist (from CVS, 4.3.2, on OpenBSD 4.5). Some message would make milter-greylist segfault: Program received signal