2002-04-23 by Les Mizzell
> "HEY, you got porn in my woggle!" > "well, you got woggle in MY porn!!!" For someone using the name rev.jon, you seem awfully interested in porn! I think the Pope wants to meet with you.... Actually, I always though it might be fun to perform the score for a soft core film. Let
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-22 by transducr
wow, that's great. congrats, grant. it seems that the wogglebug has fulfilled it's ambitions for hollywood stardom after the comparisons on the website to bebe and louis barron's fantastic planet soundtrack. who knew? i liked the suggestion of using it in a porno, though. i mean.
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-21 by Christophe Curtis
Every time I start to think I getting to know a wiard module inside and out grant points out some really cool hidden functions. Using the dual envelator as a boolean logic module is brilliant. thanks for the patch ideas! >From: "grantrichter2001" >Reply-To: wiardgroup@yahoogroups
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-20 by Sebastian Kuehnl
I'm dead curious to see the new faceplates. Anyone volunteering for photographs? Sebastian Kuehnl __________________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Sie brauchen mehr Speicher für Ihre E-Mails? - http://premiummail.y
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-20 by C. Whitten
> You are correct on the orientation of the triangles. Also, the inputs > are the solid ones. Sounds good. > As a side, the Borg has now firmly placed itself at the top of my > list of favorite filters. Sounds even gooder. I'm hearing nothing but great things about Wiard, especia
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-20 by liquidcolor@earthlink.net
>The Triangles sound great BTW. I was thinking the points could face inwards >for 'input' and out for 'output'. The Borg I received a few weeks ago has these. They are unobtrusive, and add another degree of user-friendliness to the system, You are correct on the orientation of th
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-20 by C. Whitten
> I hope this demonstrates the great > respect I have for his honest criticism, and the value I place on > user feedback in general. I don't think you should be too concerned. Obviously you always set out to do your best no matter what. Looking back, some of the things I did 5 ye
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-20 by grantrichter2001
I uploaded a scan of the Version 2.0 Classic VCO faceplate showing input / output triangles and normalization lines. All modules currently ship with the new faceplates. I have SOME Version 1 faceplates left which you can request if you wish to match existing systems. I will try t
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-20 by grantrichter2001
The gate 1-8 outputs of the Sequantizer module are diode isolated so they may be "wire or'ed" at a multiple. However the gate signal does not go low with the clock pulse, this make it difficult to use two successive stages as a trigger for an envelope. By using the AND logic mode
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-20 by grantrichter2001
> >Sure, Robert made some comments the list doesn't agree with I would once again repeat that Wiard is indebted to Robert Rich and Gino Robair for invaluable honest feedback and criticism. While it was a growth experience for me to be able to accept this criticism, the great valu
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-20 by RFahl
Right On! Will it be used in any porno movies? ----- Original Message ----- From: grantrichter2001 To: Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:57 AM Subject: [wiardgroup] Woggling soon to a theater near you > The Wiard Synthesizer Company wishes to thank the > supervising sound editor wit
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-19 by Sebastian Kuehnl
Grant has posted terrific patch descriptions. I have to thank him twice, actually. That's because the dome filter line in the quad panning patch made me have a good laugh at my tedious "frequency shifter" patch in the "Wiard_hints" text. Actually, given one uses a custom waveform
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-19 by grantrichter2001
The Wiard Synthesizer Company wishes to thank the supervising sound editor with Sony Pictures for selecting the Woggle Bug and Borg modules to provide alien bug noises and incidental creature sound effects for the forthcoming "Men In Black II".
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-19 by grantrichter2001
The Mixolator module can be used as two simultaneous pan units. These can feed the left and right channels (for front and rear) in a 4 channel quadraphonic setup or 5.1 system. Another Mixolator panner can be used to pan between front and rear. The combination of the two modules
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-19 by grantrichter2001
OK, one of the original functions of the SQR output on the Envelator was to act as mono-stable for making a gated ADSR envelope. That is if you have two Envelator modules, you can set up one as an ADSR and another as a monstable, this will give you a fixed gate time and allow you
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-19 by grantrichter2001
> I had STP, Hurst Shifter, and Cherry exhaust systems stickers on my Interesting fact is the Hurst in Hurst Shifter is also the inventor of the "Jaws of Life" emergency release system. He originally developed it for rescuing race car drivers, it has since been adopted by Fire an
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-18 by drmabuce
> What were the features? > Apologies if this has been revealed before or it comes under the 'official > secrets act'. > CW I don't think it's a secret, In fact, I think Grant may have posted some info on this group last fall. anyway... What I played was a prototype so I'll inton
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-18 by C. Whitten
> The sound is way bigger than the > box, it's smal but it ain't no toy! What were the features? Apologies if this has been revealed before or it comes under the 'official secrets act'. CW
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-17 by drmabuce
Howdy Reverend! > when mark called me a butt-pirate i was certain it would result in some sort > of controversy. > perhaps if he had criticized my "front panel" > (heh, wink-wink, nudge-nudge, say no more, say no more) > the thread would have been more interesting LOL! my point e
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-16 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 4/15/2002 11:45:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time, drmabuce@yahoo.com writes: did anybody else hear the net-audio show? my streaming audio was pretty poor and I don't know if it was my gear or the source. mike, i listened to the show and enjoyed it. it was having som
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-16 by Rev Jon
interesting point, doc. when mark called me a butt-pirate i was certain it would result in some sort of controversy. perhaps if he had criticized my "front panel" (heh, wink-wink, nudge-nudge, say no more, say no more) the thread would have been more interesting (i knew i shouldn
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-16 by its_peake
--- In wiardgroup@y..., "Rev Jon" wrote: > interesting point, doc. > > when mark called me a butt-pirate i was certain it would result in some sort > of controversy. > perhaps if he had criticized my "front panel" > (heh, wink-wink, nudge-nudge, say no more, say no more) > the th
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-16 by mafirman
--- In wiardgroup@y..., "drmabuce" wrote: [Stuff snipped out] Yes, things seem to have settled down. > > I heard the sheriff had to fire a shot at the chandelier to break it > up... wooooowee! > nuthin' like that happened when that feller called that other feller > gay, right out
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-16 by mafirman
--- In wiardgroup@y..., "drmabuce" wrote: [Stuff snipped out] Yes, things seem to have settled down. > > I heard the sheriff had to fire a shot at the chandelier to break it > up... wooooowee! > nuthin' like that happened when that feller called that other feller > gay, right out
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-16 by drmabuce
(cue large room reverb) pssssst! anybody in there? hey!!! ?????? is everybody cleared out? sure enough! the place is empty again... WHEW! nice & quiet again. ok! coast is clear jeez! lookit that- broken chairs and glass everywhere! sure hope that's FAKE glass... and.... eeeeuw! f
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-13 by Mark Pulver
CoolColJ (02:44 PM 4/13/2002) wrote: >Is it possible to buy a Wiard as a whole unit >at a cheaper price than separate modules? Hi Colin, There's a Wiard website, maybe you missed it: http://www.wiard.com At the site, on the Purchase page, there's a statement about discounts: Term
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-13 by CoolColJ
Is it possible to buy a Wiard as a whole unit at a cheaper price than separate modules? Colin
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-13 by its_peake
--- In wiardgroup@y..., "C. Whitten" wrote: Snip > The 'battle' between MOTM and Wiard is a load of tosh. Paul and Grant > obviously have no time for it either. > CW Yes, it would be nice to return to Wiard-related topics. Easier, -Mike
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-12 by C. Whitten
> why didn't EM assign a > reviewer to the Wiard that was steeped in the tradition of the "West coast" > school of synths? Because there wasn't one available, I don't know the ins and outs of EM but hasn't Gino reviewed for them in the past and isn't Gino steeped in the 'West Coa
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-12 by Mike Fisher
> It's a wonder Grant & I just throw up our hands > and grab some brewskies. Hmmm....... First round's on me. :-) Mike
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-12 by Paul Schreiber
Just to also clarify: a) Robert Rich is NOT "on the payroll" and has NEVER been. In fact, I am the only "payroll" person. I am lucky to have many folks helping me out: Robert is one of many such folks. And Grant is another. b) Gino can clarify the timetable. MANY MONTHS passed be
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by Tentochi
I own both an Emu modular and an MOTM. I do not own a Wiard. Although I did have the opportunity a few weeks ago to see the biggest (or own of the biggest) Wiard systems; I was very impressed! Both Wiard and Grant Richter are HIGHLY respected in the MOTM community (and the Balcet
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by Robair, Gino
> Thanks for point that out. Robert was picked to do the Wiard review because he knows a lot about analog synthesizers, uses them actively in his work, and he's a good writer and reviewer that gives a fair and accurate assessment. At the time of the assignment, he was not on the
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by liquidcolor@earthlink.net
> >And we know that there were no ulterior motives... > >Could you go into more detail about this comment? I'm curious about what >you perceive the motives to be. Just that, EM should have found someone a bit more impartial. What I saw was a conflict of interest. I thought Mr. Ri
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by C. Whitten
> I wished there was at least something with > an explanation of some of the less-than-obvious features. I'll second that. >Thank goodness for > the Strange book! And that! I think the principal of the no manual thing is fine. IMO though it is nice to describe at least some of th
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by Mark Pulver
Robair, Gino (01:52 PM 04/11/02) wrote: > liquidcolor@earthlink.net wrote > >>>I found it very disturbing that Mr. Rich gave the Wiard and the M*TM >>>equal points for features. Jigga what ? > >That's not correct. He gave Wiard 4.5 for features, and M*TM 4.0. To me, 1/2 of a poin
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by Robair, Gino
This paragraph, from the previous message, should be attributed to me, not liquidcolor: > I think (and I believe the designers do as well) that there's plenty of > room in the market for both systems to coexist in peace. Within the tiny > niche market for analog modular synths, t
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by Robair, Gino
liquidcolor@earthlink.net wrote > >>The main criticism levelled at Wiard in the EM review was the 'steep > >>learning curve' and the confusing layout. > >And we know that there were no ulterior motives... Could you go into more detail about this comment? I'm curious about what yo
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by liquidcolor@earthlink.net
>The main criticism levelled at Wiard in the EM review was the 'steep >learning curve' and the confusing layout. And we know that there were no ulterior motives... I found it very disturbing that Mr. Rich gave the Wiard and the M*TM equal points for features. Jigga what ? >Whethe
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by Christophe Curtis
That sounds really cool.� I like the idea a lot.�� Pulse Farm.� I can see that fitting in nicely with the'whole Wiard concept.� �I like it! I spoke with Grant this week about future modules and he mentioned that the dual enveloopers module should arrive some time this summer.� He
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by Graham Hunter
This will be quick - I promise! > From: "coyoteous" > Had you considered hiring a professional, instead of using > students? Welcome to the world of small business. > > 1. It must be attractive to men, women and children. > > There is no such thing, even within one of those group
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by C. Whitten
> preamp for mic/instrument Dual for Stereo. > - pitch -> CV converter Has this ever been perfected? I know people tell me that this or that one doesn't really work that well. I think someone else once told me the Serge one (Gentle Electronics?) was pretty good. CW
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by C. Whitten
Well we had the discussion about future modules a couple of months ago and it wasn't that lively a debate and there doesn't seem to have been any developments since. Anyway..... How likely is a new module in the near future? I was very intrigued by Grant's stated ideas. Speaking
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by Doug Pearson
At 02:37 AM 4/11/02 -0400, coopersonicsounds wrote: >a massive processor translator. >-that uses audio as a control information...as well as its own >clocks/distorions Are you thinking of a multimode external signal processor module? In true Wiard all-in-one tradition, I could im
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by violetso@aol.com
other synth ideas a massive processor translator. -that uses audio as a control information...as well as its own clocks/distorions cooper
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by liquidcolor@earthlink.net
A few months ago Grant solicited ideas for the tenth Wiard module. After the Envelooper. Anyone up on ideas ? My offering was a multiple S&H, ASR, boolean concoction that was a sort of mega clock source/multi-channel aleatoric gate generator. Like a rhythmic oriented wogglebug. T
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by Mike Fisher
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by Christophe Curtis
When did this turn into the society for artistic modular synth faceplate'design? How about some patch ideas or suggestions for future modules If you have panel artwork concerns please take it up with Grant or start a separate news group.�� Next topic please'thankyou � > >Call me
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by coyoteous
--- In wiardgroup@y..., "grantrichter2001" wrote: > The original Wiard faceplates had the "dorky learning lab look"... Call me a dork, but I want one like that! > The Wiard graphic identity was designed as the capstone project > for Professor Alane Spinney's "Graphic Arts II" cla
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2002-04-11 by coyoteous
--- In wiardgroup@y..., "grantrichter2001" wrote: > The original Wiard faceplates had the "dorky learning lab look"... Call me a dork, but I want one like that! > The Wiard graphic identity was designed as the capstone project > for Professor Alane Spinney's "Graphic Arts II" cla
Thread view
Attachments: 0