Yahoo Groups archive

Wiardgroup

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:41 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 72 of 81 · 4015 messages matched

RE: [wiardgroup] Re: Woggling soon to a theater near you

2002-04-23 by Les Mizzell

> "HEY, you got porn in my woggle!" > "well, you got woggle in MY porn!!!" For someone using the name rev.jon, you seem awfully interested in porn! I think the Pope wants to meet with you.... Actually, I always though it might be fun to perform the score for a soft core film. Let

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Woggling soon to a theater near you

2002-04-22 by transducr

wow, that's great. congrats, grant. it seems that the wogglebug has fulfilled it's ambitions for hollywood stardom after the comparisons on the website to bebe and louis barron's fantastic planet soundtrack. who knew? i liked the suggestion of using it in a porno, though. i mean.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Envelator Mix module logic and quadrature mode

2002-04-21 by Christophe Curtis

Every time I start to think I getting to know a wiard module inside and out grant points out some really cool hidden functions. Using the dual envelator as a boolean logic module is brilliant. thanks for the patch ideas! >From: "grantrichter2001" >Reply-To: wiardgroup@yahoogroups

Thread view Attachments: 0

Pics of the new faceplates

2002-04-20 by Sebastian Kuehnl

I'm dead curious to see the new faceplates. Anyone volunteering for photographs? Sebastian Kuehnl __________________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Sie brauchen mehr Speicher für Ihre E-Mails? - http://premiummail.y

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Triangles

2002-04-20 by C. Whitten

> You are correct on the orientation of the triangles. Also, the inputs > are the solid ones. Sounds good. > As a side, the Borg has now firmly placed itself at the top of my > list of favorite filters. Sounds even gooder. I'm hearing nothing but great things about Wiard, especia

Thread view Attachments: 0

Triangles

2002-04-20 by liquidcolor@earthlink.net

>The Triangles sound great BTW. I was thinking the points could face inwards >for 'input' and out for 'output'. The Borg I received a few weeks ago has these. They are unobtrusive, and add another degree of user-friendliness to the system, You are correct on the orientation of th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-20 by C. Whitten

> I hope this demonstrates the great > respect I have for his honest criticism, and the value I place on > user feedback in general. I don't think you should be too concerned. Obviously you always set out to do your best no matter what. Looking back, some of the things I did 5 ye

Thread view Attachments: 0

Version 2.0 Classic VOC faceplate scan

2002-04-20 by grantrichter2001

I uploaded a scan of the Version 2.0 Classic VCO faceplate showing input / output triangles and normalization lines. All modules currently ship with the new faceplates. I have SOME Version 1 faceplates left which you can request if you wish to match existing systems. I will try t

Thread view Attachments: 0

PWM of Sequantizer Gates with Mix module

2002-04-20 by grantrichter2001

The gate 1-8 outputs of the Sequantizer module are diode isolated so they may be "wire or'ed" at a multiple. However the gate signal does not go low with the clock pulse, this make it difficult to use two successive stages as a trigger for an envelope. By using the AND logic mode

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-20 by grantrichter2001

> >Sure, Robert made some comments the list doesn't agree with I would once again repeat that Wiard is indebted to Robert Rich and Gino Robair for invaluable honest feedback and criticism. While it was a growth experience for me to be able to accept this criticism, the great valu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Woggling soon to a theater near you

2002-04-20 by RFahl

Right On! Will it be used in any porno movies? ----- Original Message ----- From: grantrichter2001 To: Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:57 AM Subject: [wiardgroup] Woggling soon to a theater near you > The Wiard Synthesizer Company wishes to thank the > supervising sound editor wit

Thread view Attachments: 0

Frequency shifting (was: Spatial positioning in multi-channel systems)

2002-04-19 by Sebastian Kuehnl

Grant has posted terrific patch descriptions. I have to thank him twice, actually. That's because the dome filter line in the quad panning patch made me have a good laugh at my tedious "frequency shifter" patch in the "Wiard_hints" text. Actually, given one uses a custom waveform

Thread view Attachments: 0

Woggling soon to a theater near you

2002-04-19 by grantrichter2001

The Wiard Synthesizer Company wishes to thank the supervising sound editor with Sony Pictures for selecting the Woggle Bug and Borg modules to provide alien bug noises and incidental creature sound effects for the forthcoming "Men In Black II".

Thread view Attachments: 0

Spatial positioning in multi-channel systems

2002-04-19 by grantrichter2001

The Mixolator module can be used as two simultaneous pan units. These can feed the left and right channels (for front and rear) in a 4 channel quadraphonic setup or 5.1 system. Another Mixolator panner can be used to pan between front and rear. The combination of the two modules

Thread view Attachments: 0

Envelator Mix module logic and quadrature mode

2002-04-19 by grantrichter2001

OK, one of the original functions of the SQR output on the Envelator was to act as mono-stable for making a gated ADSR envelope. That is if you have two Envelator modules, you can set up one as an ADSR and another as a monstable, this will give you a fixed gate time and allow you

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: pssst!

2002-04-19 by grantrichter2001

> I had STP, Hurst Shifter, and Cherry exhaust systems stickers on my Interesting fact is the Hurst in Hurst Shifter is also the inventor of the "Jaws of Life" emergency release system. He originally developed it for rescuing race car drivers, it has since been adopted by Fire an

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Mini Synth

2002-04-18 by drmabuce

> What were the features? > Apologies if this has been revealed before or it comes under the 'official > secrets act'. > CW I don't think it's a secret, In fact, I think Grant may have posted some info on this group last fall. anyway... What I played was a prototype so I'll inton

Thread view Attachments: 0

Mini Synth

2002-04-18 by C. Whitten

> The sound is way bigger than the > box, it's smal but it ain't no toy! What were the features? Apologies if this has been revealed before or it comes under the 'official secrets act'. CW

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: pssst!

2002-04-17 by drmabuce

Howdy Reverend! > when mark called me a butt-pirate i was certain it would result in some sort > of controversy. > perhaps if he had criticized my "front panel" > (heh, wink-wink, nudge-nudge, say no more, say no more) > the thread would have been more interesting LOL! my point e

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] pssst!

2002-04-16 by davevosh@aol.com

In a message dated 4/15/2002 11:45:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time, drmabuce@yahoo.com writes: did anybody else hear the net-audio show? my streaming audio was pretty poor and I don't know if it was my gear or the source. mike, i listened to the show and enjoyed it. it was having som

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] pssst!

2002-04-16 by Rev Jon

interesting point, doc. when mark called me a butt-pirate i was certain it would result in some sort of controversy. perhaps if he had criticized my "front panel" (heh, wink-wink, nudge-nudge, say no more, say no more) the thread would have been more interesting (i knew i shouldn

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: pssst!

2002-04-16 by its_peake

--- In wiardgroup@y..., "Rev Jon" wrote: > interesting point, doc. > > when mark called me a butt-pirate i was certain it would result in some sort > of controversy. > perhaps if he had criticized my "front panel" > (heh, wink-wink, nudge-nudge, say no more, say no more) > the th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: pssst!

2002-04-16 by mafirman

--- In wiardgroup@y..., "drmabuce" wrote: [Stuff snipped out] Yes, things seem to have settled down. > > I heard the sheriff had to fire a shot at the chandelier to break it > up... wooooowee! > nuthin' like that happened when that feller called that other feller > gay, right out

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: pssst!

2002-04-16 by mafirman

--- In wiardgroup@y..., "drmabuce" wrote: [Stuff snipped out] Yes, things seem to have settled down. > > I heard the sheriff had to fire a shot at the chandelier to break it > up... wooooowee! > nuthin' like that happened when that feller called that other feller > gay, right out

Thread view Attachments: 0

pssst!

2002-04-16 by drmabuce

(cue large room reverb) pssssst! anybody in there? hey!!! ?????? is everybody cleared out? sure enough! the place is empty again... WHEW! nice & quiet again. ok! coast is clear jeez! lookit that- broken chairs and glass everywhere! sure hope that's FAKE glass... and.... eeeeuw! f

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Wiard package

2002-04-13 by Mark Pulver

CoolColJ (02:44 PM 4/13/2002) wrote: >Is it possible to buy a Wiard as a whole unit >at a cheaper price than separate modules? Hi Colin, There's a Wiard website, maybe you missed it: http://www.wiard.com At the site, on the Purchase page, there's a statement about discounts: Term

Thread view Attachments: 0

Wiard package

2002-04-13 by CoolColJ

Is it possible to buy a Wiard as a whole unit at a cheaper price than separate modules? Colin

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-13 by its_peake

--- In wiardgroup@y..., "C. Whitten" wrote: Snip > The 'battle' between MOTM and Wiard is a load of tosh. Paul and Grant > obviously have no time for it either. > CW Yes, it would be nice to return to Wiard-related topics. Easier, -Mike

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-12 by C. Whitten

> why didn't EM assign a > reviewer to the Wiard that was steeped in the tradition of the "West coast" > school of synths? Because there wasn't one available, I don't know the ins and outs of EM but hasn't Gino reviewed for them in the past and isn't Gino steeped in the 'West Coa

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [wiardgroup] Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-12 by Paul Schreiber

Just to also clarify: a) Robert Rich is NOT "on the payroll" and has NEVER been. In fact, I am the only "payroll" person. I am lucky to have many folks helping me out: Robert is one of many such folks. And Grant is another. b) Gino can clarify the timetable. MANY MONTHS passed be

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [wiardgroup] Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-11 by Tentochi

I own both an Emu modular and an MOTM. I do not own a Wiard. Although I did have the opportunity a few weeks ago to see the biggest (or own of the biggest) Wiard systems; I was very impressed! Both Wiard and Grant Richter are HIGHLY respected in the MOTM community (and the Balcet

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [wiardgroup] Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-11 by Robair, Gino

> Thanks for point that out. Robert was picked to do the Wiard review because he knows a lot about analog synthesizers, uses them actively in his work, and he's a good writer and reviewer that gives a fair and accurate assessment. At the time of the assignment, he was not on the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-11 by liquidcolor@earthlink.net

> >And we know that there were no ulterior motives... > >Could you go into more detail about this comment? I'm curious about what >you perceive the motives to be. Just that, EM should have found someone a bit more impartial. What I saw was a conflict of interest. I thought Mr. Ri

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-11 by C. Whitten

> I wished there was at least something with > an explanation of some of the less-than-obvious features. I'll second that. >Thank goodness for > the Strange book! And that! I think the principal of the no manual thing is fine. IMO though it is nice to describe at least some of th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-11 by Mark Pulver

Robair, Gino (01:52 PM 04/11/02) wrote: > liquidcolor@earthlink.net wrote > >>>I found it very disturbing that Mr. Rich gave the Wiard and the M*TM >>>equal points for features. Jigga what ? > >That's not correct. He gave Wiard 4.5 for features, and M*TM 4.0. To me, 1/2 of a poin

Thread view Attachments: 0

revision Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-11 by Robair, Gino

This paragraph, from the previous message, should be attributed to me, not liquidcolor: > I think (and I believe the designers do as well) that there's plenty of > room in the market for both systems to coexist in peace. Within the tiny > niche market for analog modular synths, t

Thread view Attachments: 0

Robert Rich/manuals

2002-04-11 by Robair, Gino

liquidcolor@earthlink.net wrote > >>The main criticism levelled at Wiard in the EM review was the 'steep > >>learning curve' and the confusing layout. > >And we know that there were no ulterior motives... Could you go into more detail about this comment? I'm curious about what yo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Future Modules

2002-04-11 by liquidcolor@earthlink.net

>The main criticism levelled at Wiard in the EM review was the 'steep >learning curve' and the confusing layout. And we know that there were no ulterior motives... I found it very disturbing that Mr. Rich gave the Wiard and the M*TM equal points for features. Jigga what ? >Whethe

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Wiard tenth module

2002-04-11 by Christophe Curtis

That sounds really cool.� I like the idea a lot.�� Pulse Farm.� I can see that fitting in nicely with the'whole Wiard concept.� �I like it! I spoke with Grant this week about future modules and he mentioned that the dual enveloopers module should arrive some time this summer.� He

Thread view Attachments: 0

One last faceplate post...

2002-04-11 by Graham Hunter

This will be quick - I promise! > From: "coyoteous" > Had you considered hiring a professional, instead of using > students? Welcome to the world of small business. > > 1. It must be attractive to men, women and children. > > There is no such thing, even within one of those group

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Wiard tenth module

2002-04-11 by C. Whitten

> preamp for mic/instrument Dual for Stereo. > - pitch -> CV converter Has this ever been perfected? I know people tell me that this or that one doesn't really work that well. I think someone else once told me the Serge one (Gentle Electronics?) was pretty good. CW

Thread view Attachments: 0

Future Modules

2002-04-11 by C. Whitten

Well we had the discussion about future modules a couple of months ago and it wasn't that lively a debate and there doesn't seem to have been any developments since. Anyway..... How likely is a new module in the near future? I was very intrigued by Grant's stated ideas. Speaking

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Wiard tenth module

2002-04-11 by Doug Pearson

At 02:37 AM 4/11/02 -0400, coopersonicsounds wrote: >a massive processor translator. >-that uses audio as a control information...as well as its own >clocks/distorions Are you thinking of a multimode external signal processor module? In true Wiard all-in-one tradition, I could im

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Wiard tenth module

2002-04-11 by violetso@aol.com

other synth ideas a massive processor translator. -that uses audio as a control information...as well as its own clocks/distorions cooper

Thread view Attachments: 0

Wiard tenth module

2002-04-11 by liquidcolor@earthlink.net

A few months ago Grant solicited ideas for the tenth Wiard module. After the Envelooper. Anyone up on ideas ? My offering was a multiple S&H, ASR, boolean concoction that was a sort of mega clock source/multi-channel aleatoric gate generator. Like a rhythmic oriented wogglebug. T

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: anamod [OT]

2002-04-11 by Christophe Curtis

When did this turn into the society for artistic modular synth faceplate'design? How about some patch ideas or suggestions for future modules If you have panel artwork concerns please take it up with Grant or start a separate news group.�� Next topic please'thankyou � > >Call me

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: anamod [OT]

2002-04-11 by coyoteous

--- In wiardgroup@y..., "grantrichter2001" wrote: > The original Wiard faceplates had the "dorky learning lab look"... Call me a dork, but I want one like that! > The Wiard graphic identity was designed as the capstone project > for Professor Alane Spinney's "Graphic Arts II" cla

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: anamod [OT]

2002-04-11 by coyoteous

--- In wiardgroup@y..., "grantrichter2001" wrote: > The original Wiard faceplates had the "dorky learning lab look"... Call me a dork, but I want one like that! > The Wiard graphic identity was designed as the capstone project > for Professor Alane Spinney's "Graphic Arts II" cla

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.