> why didn't EM assign a > reviewer to the Wiard that was steeped in the tradition of the "West coast" > school of synths? Because there wasn't one available, I don't know the ins and outs of EM but hasn't Gino reviewed for them in the past and isn't Gino steeped in the 'West Coast' tradition. >Sure, Robert made some comments the list doesn't agree with Just to be slightly pedantic, I wouldn't necessarily generalise in that way. At least a couple of people (including myself) didn't disagree with his comments. It was an interesting review for anyone contemplating a Wiard purchase. There was also a huge compliment paid to Grant for listening to advice and modifying one of his products as a result. My only comment at the time was that 3.5 out of 5 seemed like a low score considering the mostly positive content of the review. This was debated and explained at the time so sorry for repeating it again. Please note, as was mentioned yesterday, that Grant has apparently been snowed under with orders since the review appeared. The 'battle' between MOTM and Wiard is a load of tosh. Paul and Grant obviously have no time for it either. CW
Message
Re: [wiardgroup] Robert Rich/manuals
2002-04-12 by C. Whitten
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.