Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-15 by Michael Osten
... Ok, so then I m confused. Does 2.1.2-5 require that the acl greylist default be at the bottom of the file? Or is default not a valid option for this
Messages
Browse messages
Page 95 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-15 by eclark
I fully agree with Umes point. For a default rule like this, its position in the conf file should not matter. Ideally, all whitelist information should be
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-15 by manu@netbsd.org
... Order of acl lines does matters: milter-gresylist stops reading the ACL on first match. acl {grey|white|black}list default will match anything, so if you
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-15 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... mkettler Sounds like a bug in the default config for your release. Do you have 3.0a1? mkettler That s the only version that I have that suffers from
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-15 by Jobst Schmalenbach
... {SNIP} ... I am hi-jacking this thread from a previous thread Changing return msg, code and ecode . I have milter-greylist-3.0a1 which has the
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-14 by Michael Osten
... I m running 2.1.2-5, and you are right, the default acl was not present. I ve moved it to the bottom of the file (I have a perl script that builds the
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-14 by Matt Kettler
... Sounds like a bug in the default config for your release. Do you have 3.0a1? That s the only version that I have that suffers from this bug, but my
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-14 by Michael Osten
... I was just reading that, but in the default greylist.conf file the acl greylist default was not at the bottom of the file. -- Michael Osten
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-14 by manu@netbsd.org
... (snip) ... What version? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-14 by Matt Kettler
... Are you sure that whitelist statement occurs before your greylist statement(s)? Order matters, as milter-greylist will scan from the start of the list and
milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-14 by Michael Osten
I posted about this a couple of weeks ago. We are a large ISP and receive approx. 8+ million emails a day. We maintain a list of white- listed that is around
Re: [milter-greylist] acl's for rbl's
2006-09-12 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... All good rules, actually some servers are new for me. But I noticed other issue, usually every smtp server uses also RBL servers to block spam and so
acl's for rbl's
2006-09-12 by George Elgin
in addition to the sorbs one (mentioned in man page) these are some i am testing. does anyone have suggestions/corrections ? one thing i am noticing is that
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... It depends of the order of your access list: first match wins. The big new feature in 3.0 is that you can use the information sender is in a given DNSRBL
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same
2006-09-11 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... Why not? A lot of people are using their own smtp server for sending emails. ... Heh. ... Right now I m using - sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, bl.spamcop.net,
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by eclark
We are still running I 2.0.2 (the version linked to on the homepage), and havent upgraded yet to a blacklist enabled version of the milter (later versions of
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I use SORBS DUHL DNSRBL. There is an example in 3.0a6 s README (section 9) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by eclark
Mart; My guess is that you arent in the United States. Here, a large number of cable companies that provide broadband do not allow outbound smtp traffic at
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same
2006-09-11 by Oliver Fromme
... Sending mails from dynamic IP addresses without using the ISP s mail server is not normal . ... That s not true in general. It depends which blacklist
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by eclark
I would love to do this. How are you determining if they arecoming from a dynamic pool?
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... All kind of normal emails. ... Well, I can t tell to the clients to use legal smtp server. And by the way, almost every big ISP smpt (hotmail,
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by Oliver Fromme
... Excatly. That s exactly what I am thinking. And that s why it makes sense not to delay dynamic IP pools for a long time, or to greylist them at all.
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... They also don t send you e-mail directly. If the machine is a SMTP server, it is not powered off randomly, and if it is not a SMTP server, then it does not
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by Oliver Fromme
... That s something I don t understand. People sending mail to you from dynamic IP dial-in pools usually don t let their PC running 24 hours per day. That
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... You have 70% legitimate senders from dynamic IP pools? What kind of e-mail do you receive? People running on dymanic IP pools tend to use their ISP SMTP
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... I hope so, but I can t set 4h delay as legal senders and receivers are going mad. ... Idea is good but I almost cant use it, as like I said, also at
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Some spamware handle resending now. They seems to give up against a delay of several hours. Of course several hours is not something you want for any
Greylist database retain tuples timeout same as delay?
2006-09-11 by Mart Pirita
Tere. I have some questions, as the spam keeps coming true lately more than before. So I did set: acl greylist default delay 15m code 451 ecode 4.7.1 msg
Re: [milter-greylist] 3-clause BSD?
2006-09-10 by Oliver Fromme
... Right. But what s the problem with that? The existing license is perfectly acceptable. ... The most obvious options is to keep evrything as-is. Why do
Re: [milter-greylist] 3-clause BSD?
2006-09-10 by manu@netbsd.org
... If that makes your life easier, I can add such a clause -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
3-clause BSD?
2006-09-10 by AIDA Shinra
Milter-greylist s license consists of 3 clauses but not a so-called 3-clause BSD. [23]-clause BSD usually implies GPL compatibility, but milter-greylist is
Re: [milter-greylist] code, ecode and message and spam results?
2006-09-08 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I only use the dynamic pool DNSRBL, which returns 127.0.0.10. ... milter-greylist does not look at the headers, just at the incoming IP address. If an user
Re: [milter-greylist] code, ecode and message and spam results?
2006-09-08 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... Set the autwhite as less as You can, for example 1-3 hour or just disable the autowhitelist completely? -- Mart
Re: [milter-greylist] code, ecode and message and spam results?
2006-09-08 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... I don t think so. That s by the way why I tried to change this error code, as seems some of them will specially attack these servers which give the
Re: [milter-greylist] code, ecode and message and spam results?
2006-09-08 by Jobst Schmalenbach
... You are correct! However, I have found that one way of beating ANY GREYMILTER is sending an email ONE day and send ANOTHER ONE the next day. Because the
Re: [milter-greylist] code, ecode and message and spam results?
2006-09-07 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... If you increase the delay, they will give up. Handling resends needs resources. The spammer midly care, since he is not paying for the CPU, memory, and
Re: [milter-greylist] code, ecode and message and spam results?
2006-09-07 by Chris Hoogendyk
... I ve been getting more stock spam lately. Every time I check full headers, I see the greylist header indicating that the message was delayed. So they are
Re: [milter-greylist] code, ecode and message and spam results?
2006-09-07 by eclark
We are working on compiling a list of known spam servers. Suprisingly, there are three known servers sending spam from legitimate MTAs in Australia, dumping
code, ecode and message and spam results?
2006-09-07 by Mart Pirita
Tere. I have used few days custom code, ecode and message: acl greylist default delay 15m code 421 ecode 4.3.2 msg overload And noticed, that I did get
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Changing return msg, code and ecode
2006-09-06 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... Sure, active lines are: acl whitelist addr 127.0.0.0/8 acl whitelist domain .ee acl greylist default delay 15m code 421 ecode 4.3.2 msg
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Changing return msg, code and ecode
2006-09-06 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Can you send me the config file? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Changing return msg, code and ecode
2006-09-06 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... Hmm, I was posted it before (Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 alpha 6 is out), but here it is again: So here is the alpha 6. It s quite
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Changing return msg, code and ecode
2006-09-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... What s missing from alpha 6? If I m not aware of problems, I can t fix them... -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] Howdy
2006-09-06 by Oliver Fromme
... Very true. Also take into account that the delay will only happen for the very first mail between two persons. After that, the tuple is auto-whitelisted,
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Changing return msg, code and ecode
2006-09-06 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... Heh, it was me. It works for me and now I m using the a4 version, as a5 eat 99% cpu and a6 was missing some log entry s. -- Mart
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Changing return msg, code and ecode
2006-09-06 by Jobst Schmalenbach
... I said to you that I will try on the weekend to play with it again, you suggested to turn debug on, so I will do that ... I will keep you posted once the
Re: [milter-greylist] Howdy
2006-09-06 by Jobst Schmalenbach
... True, I have greylisting running for more than a year ... I made a change about 2 weeks ago to be able to whitelist a special email address not to be
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Changing return msg, code and ecode
2006-09-06 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I guess you supplied milter-greylist with a config file containing syntax errors. Since the config is reloaded automatically when it is changed, it s
Re: [milter-greylist] Howdy
2006-09-06 by Jobst Schmalenbach
... I HAD the same problem, I just hung in there and didnt barge ... and every now and then I give them a report of the refused messages, that calms them down.
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Changing return msg, code and ecode
2006-09-06 by Jobst Schmalenbach
... Not quite! That person hi-jacked the thread I started, I still do not know whether it works for me .. I run two full blown mailservers (one company and