Tere. > in addition to the sorbs one (mentioned in man page) these > are some i am testing. does anyone have > suggestions/corrections ? > > All good rules, actually some servers are new for me. But I noticed other issue, usually every smtp server uses also RBL servers to block spam and so do I. But if rule order counts, then at least in me sendmail.mc dnsbl rules are BEFORE than milter-greylist rules. So I presume, that first sendmail dnsbl rules deny all senders listed in rbl servers and later milter-greylist just delays these sender, who pass the sendmail dnsbl rules. Using different rbl servers in sendmail and milter-greylist, may give some result, but usually most rbl serves includes quite identical data, so seems, that if I'm using sendmail dnsbl rules, there is no point to use milter-greylist dnsbl at all? -- Mart
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] acl's for rbl's
2006-09-12 by Mart Pirita
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.