Unofficial Debian Package for milter-greylist
2006-08-31 by Herbert Straub
Hallo, i am using milter-greylist for two month without any problem on Ubuntu Dapper Drake. Badly, i cannot found a package in the Debian repository. I
Messages
Browse messages
Page 97 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
milter-greylist 3.0 alpha 5 is out
2006-08-31 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Here is our alpha 5. http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-3.0a5.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-3.0a5.tgz) = 1ba9fdf98971066ce039115e79b8783c In
Re: [milter-greylist] Variable delays
2006-08-31 by Robert Stampfli
... After soaking 3.0a2 for several days, it s now up and running on all my servers and everything appears to be copacetic. The long greylist times on mail
Re: [milter-greylist] "max" setting for the number of ACL's in greylist.conf?
2006-08-30 by manu@netbsd.org
... Maybe it s time to use a DNSRBL of broken MTA that are legitimate senders? Such a source could be used as a whitelist source. Does it already exists, or
Re: [milter-greylist] "max" setting for the number of ACL's in greylist.conf?
2006-08-30 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, you have much more messages per second than I do. However, the big ACL just means that you need enough CPU power to walk the ACL. And you can share
Re: [milter-greylist] "max" setting for the number of ACL's in greylist.conf?
2006-08-30 by Michael Osten
... We re not doing 2250 messages a second :). We also use commercial and internal RBL s. -- Michael Osten
Re: [milter-greylist] "max" setting for the number of ACL's in greylist.conf?
2006-08-30 by Michael Osten
... in excess of 8+ million messages a day. The problem with greylisting for us is that there are large amounts of broken MTA s out there (groupwise,
Re: [milter-greylist] "max" setting for the number of ACL's in greylist.conf?
2006-08-30 by eclark
How much mail are you processing? From what we have seen using this, even half as many rules (and use of dnsrbl at all) would have taken the greylist down
Re: [milter-greylist] "max" setting for the number of ACL's in greylist.conf?
2006-08-30 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... My greylist.conf has 2500 lines. I have 3 levels of filtering, with various delays and DNSRBL usage. The config file contains the list of users for each of
Re: [milter-greylist] "max" setting for the number of ACL's in greylist.conf?
2006-08-30 by eclark
At the risk of sounding stupid, if you have 6000 exceptions to your greylist, it does not seem to me that greylisting is really in your best interests. We get
Re: [milter-greylist] "max" setting for the number of ACL's in greylist.conf?
2006-08-30 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... There is no hardwired limit. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
"max" setting for the number of ACL's in greylist.conf?
2006-08-30 by Michael Osten
Is there a max setting for the number of ACL s in greylist.conf? I run a very busy site and we currently have over 6k whitelist ACL s. I am seeing ACL s be
Re: [milter-greylist] missing vsyslog
2006-08-28 by manu@netbsd.org
... FWIW, it s esay to check for a function: you can get HAVE_VSYSLOG defined or not in config.h by just adding vsyslog to AC_CHECK_FUNCS() in configure.ac --
Re: [milter-greylist] missing vsyslog
2006-08-28 by manu@netbsd.org
... Right, I ll add the configure test for vsyslog. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
broken MX sync on Tru64 UNIX
2006-08-28 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
Hello, It looks like that the MX sync is totally broken on the Tru64 UNIX system. I have only this kind of messages and the MX connections are closed
missing vsyslog
2006-08-28 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Zut. I do not have vsyslog() in Tru64 UNIX. With the attached patch it is at least compiling fine if CFLAGS= -DNO_VSYSLOG is there on the configure
milter-greylist 3.0 alpha4 is out
2006-08-28 by manu@netbsd.org
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: [3.0 alpha3] ... And here is 3.0 alpha4 with your fixes included:
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 alpha3 is out
2006-08-28 by manu@netbsd.org
... I ll make an alpha 4 with this patch integrated later this afternoon. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 alpha3 is out
2006-08-28 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu Here is the alpha3 of milter-greylist 3.0 It seems there are two problems: - Since sin_addr and sin6_addr has different offset in struct
milter-greylist 3.0 alpha3 is out
2006-08-28 by manu@netbsd.org
Here is the alpha3 of milter-greylist 3.0 http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-3.0a3.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-3.0a3.tgz) =
Re: [milter-greylist] Variable delays
2006-08-28 by Robert Stampfli
... It s installed on one of my backup mail servers where a lot of the spam seems to come in on, so I ll know in a day or so if it is working. I did make one
Re: [milter-greylist] Variable delays
2006-08-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... If I had known, I would have named it 3.0 (not alpha 2). Give it a try, and don t forget to tell me if it works :-) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: [milter-greylist] Variable delays
2006-08-27 by Robert Stampfli
... Super. Just what I was looking for. Thanks for this info. I presume 3.0 alpha2 is solid enough for everyday use? I m using 2.1.3 now. Rob
Re: [milter-greylist] Variable delays
2006-08-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... With milter-greylist 3.0 alpha2: list friends from { friend1@foo.com friend2@bar.com friend3@buz.com } acl whitelist list friends rcpt
Variable delays
2006-08-27 by Rob Stampfli
Aside from the dnsbl checks, is there a way to impose a specific delay when specifying a greylisting rule? I have an email account where I only expect to get
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.02 crashes
2006-08-25 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... A legitimate site may go offline for more than a day... But the setting is there so that you can tweak it to your taste. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.02 crashes
2006-08-25 by Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster
I decreased the timeout from 5 days to 26 hours for keeping tuples. My database decreased to 400 KB. What s the point in keeping tuples for so long? If my
Re: [milter-greylist] RFC: checking sendmail macros in ACL
2006-08-25 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Yes, line length, and avoid replicating the same macro value in multiple rules. ... That list has a somewhat different semantic than the other ones: we
Re: [milter-greylist] RFC: checking sendmail macros in ACL
2006-08-25 by AIDA Shinra
... 1. What is the advantage of giving names to macro conditions rather than the following syntax? Line length? acl greylist macro {client_resolve} FORGED
Re: [milter-greylist] RFC: checking sendmail macros in ACL
2006-08-25 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... No comment, anyone? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.02 crashes
2006-08-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... That suggests a timing-dependent issue, since the olny difference is that it gets slower due to debug printf. ... When we cleanup any tuple, we have to
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.02 crashes
2006-08-25 by Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster
I don t have gdb available, so I have been running in foreground with the -Dv options. The only crash so far left a message about an Alarm. Also, it appears
Re: [milter-greylist] Fwd: re: max children issue
2006-08-24 by eclark
Hi all, I was wondering if anyone had some input on the issue I asked about earlier regarding children maxing out? Thanks kindly.
RFC: checking sendmail macros in ACL
2006-08-24 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I had an idea about this: what about allowing random macros to be checked, instead of just this particular one? I think about such a syntax: sm_macro
Re: [milter-greylist] bind to single IP address
2006-08-22 by AIDA Shinra
... Sendmail looks to be able to tell milters the IP address of the local side for each connection via ${daemon_addr}. If I am right, milters can use it
Re: [milter-greylist] [PATCH] New feature and threading bug fix
2006-08-22 by AIDA Shinra
... First, most of their reverse DNS are not malicious forgeries but their ISP s misconfigurations. I feel forged misleading. Second, sendmail records them
Fwd: re: max children issue
2006-08-22 by eclark
All; I am having a problem wherein I max out at 255(6) children from milter-greylist. This is causing an issue, as sendmail attempts to open a pipe to a child,
Re: [milter-greylist] bind to single IP address
2006-08-22 by Peter Peters
... Hash: SHA1 ... Spammers assume the secondary MX has less defenses. They could be the ISP s that offers fallback services to all its customers. A fallback
Re: [milter-greylist] bind to single IP address
2006-08-22 by Denis Solovyov
PZ I d like to configure sendmail and milter-greylist, so that PZ sendmail listens to two different IP-address, but have PZ milter-greylist act on only one
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.02 crashes
2006-08-22 by manu@netbsd.org
... Not as far as I know. Run milter-greylist -Dv within gdb and issue a bt command when it crashes. That will help tracking the problem down. -- Emmanuel
Re: [milter-greylist] [PATCH] New feature and threading bug fix
2006-08-22 by manu@netbsd.org
... What DNSRBL do you use to identify which RIR allocated an IP? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.02 crashes
2006-08-22 by Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster
At the end of this message are all the entries from 2 seconds of my maillog from a crash today, starting with the last greylist action and ending with the
Re: [milter-greylist] bind to single IP address
2006-08-21 by Fabien Tassin
... interesting questions. My own experience is that it depends on the type of spam(mer)s. Some prefer secondaries only, some prefer primaries, some try both.
Re: [milter-greylist] [PATCH] New feature and threading bug fix
2006-08-21 by Matt Kettler
... True, but it s still likely useful if you also use the per-acl greylist delay time, and use it as a criteria for a longer greylist period. Or, if you re
Re: [milter-greylist] [PATCH] New feature and threading bug fix
2006-08-21 by Jack L. Stone
... This may be forged thing would have a lot of FPs methinks...... (^_^) Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american
Re: [milter-greylist] bind to single IP address
2006-08-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... Last time I heard about that, I was given the following reason: regular mail prefer the primary MX, whereas spamware sends to any MX, regardless of the
Re: [milter-greylist] [PATCH] New feature and threading bug fix
2006-08-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... Some thoughts: - may_be_forged name is a bit long to read in ACL. What about just forged? - Changes to documentation for the new feature would be nice :-)
bind to single IP address
2006-08-21 by Pim Zandbergen
Hi, I d like to configure sendmail and milter-greylist, so that sendmail listens to two different IP-address, but have milter-greylist act on only one address.
[PATCH] New feature and threading bug fix
2006-08-21 by AIDA Shinra
I made three changes against milter-greylist. They are conceptually independent from each other, but patches can only be applied in the right order. 1.
Re: [milter-greylist] configure and drac
2006-08-20 by Fabien Tassin
... basically, the test ${enable_drac+set} = set just checks if either --enable-drac or --disable-drac were used. Then, it assigns CFLAGS inconditionnaly,