/tmp/access-list.debug
2006-10-06 by AIDA Shinra
Two problems around /tmp/access-list.debug: * It is very dangerous to create a file at /tmp naively, especially with root privilege. * n is missing.
Messages
Browse messages
Page 94 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 is out
2006-10-06 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Unfortunately there does not seems to be an easy way of doing that with autoconf: there is a PREFIX_DEFAULT macro, but not a SYSCONFDIR_DEFAULT. Any idea,
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 is out
2006-10-06 by Matthias Scheler
... That sounds reasonable. ... I m not a DRAC user but I googled the information yesterday: 1.) Dynamic Relay Authorization Control 2.)
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 is out
2006-10-05 by manu@netbsd.org
... Now I attempted to fix it, I wonder if it s not on purpose. If I fix it, then running configure with no option will drop files in /usr/local/etc and
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 - freebsd4.7 - no compile
2006-10-05 by manu@netbsd.org
... Link with libbind.a from BIND9 and it will be alright. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 - freebsd4.7 - no compile
2006-10-05 by Bill Levering
Hajimu UMEMOTO, Thank you, that is much better. Since you commented about the earlier warnings, I included the newest warnings, but milter compiled ok.
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 - freebsd4.7 - no compile
2006-10-05 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... ume I could reproduce it on my 4.11-STABLE box. It is rather name space ume problem in FreeBSD 4.X and earlier, and sys/types.h shouldn t be ume
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 - freebsd4.7 - no compile
2006-10-05 by Oliver Fromme
... Not a good idea. 4.7 was released four years ago, and it s not officially supported anymore, which means that you won t get security advisories and
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 - freebsd4.7 - no compile
2006-10-05 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... idbill Before anyone has issues with 4.7, let me state that a moderate size idbill ISP (of 400 servers) runs all their servers on this platform. They
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 - freebsd4.7 - no compile
2006-10-05 by Bill Levering
Before anyone has issues with 4.7, let me state that a moderate size ISP (of 400 servers) runs all their servers on this platform. They are working on
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 is out
2006-10-05 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Hello, The PACKAGE_VERSION did not get updated from 3.0rc3 to 3.0rc4, never mind. Otherwise it is OK to me. Bests, Attila
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 is out
2006-10-05 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... But you are the milter crowd. If nobody test the software, it cannot get stable stamp. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 is out
2006-10-05 by eclark
Dunno, I cant test 3.0, as we have no functional test environment that we can load down with as much mail as we get short of forking our traffic at the edge.
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 is out
2006-10-05 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Is it unstable at yours? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 is out
2006-10-05 by eclark
Dunno. Waiting for the 3.0 milter to go stable so I can push it into production though. :)
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 is out
2006-10-05 by Matthias Scheler
... 1.) The --sysconfdir option to the configure script doesn t work. Nothing in the source tree pays attention to it although configure --help mentions
milter-greylist 3.0 rc4 is out
2006-10-04 by manu@netbsd.org
Here is our release candidate 4 http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-3.0rc4.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-3.0rc4.tgz) =
Re: [milter-greylist] xface
2006-10-02 by William F. Dudley Jr.
Emmanuel, I installed compface on my FreeBSD machine just so I could see what picture you put in your XFace: header line. I was surprised to find the BSD
Re: [milter-greylist] ACL logging bugs
2006-10-02 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Thanks, you ll have them in the next rc -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
ACL logging bugs
2006-10-02 by AIDA Shinra
Hello, I found two types of buggy messages in syslog: 1. Mail from addr=evil.spammers.org[1.2.3.4] exists in DNSRBL (null) 2. load list item ^G/24 The
Re: [milter-greylist] Broken MX sync between Linux and Tru64 UNIX
2006-09-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... I checked it in, you ll have it in 3.0rc4 -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] greylist-3.0rc3 with solaris 10.1 X86
2006-09-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... Can you send me the config.log, so that I discover why that flags? ... I don t understand this warning: the prototype and the function have the same
Broken MX sync between Linux and Tru64 UNIX
2006-09-27 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
Hello, I found a problem with MX synchronization from a Linux box towards a Tru64 UNIX system. When the milter-greylist is stopped on Tru64, the MX socket goes
greylist-3.0rc3 with solaris 10.1 X86
2006-09-27 by Christian PELISSIER
Compilation is OK under Solaris 10 X86 with gcc. CFLAGS are : -D_REENTRANT -D__EXTENSIONS__ -D_BSD_SOURCE ./configure --prefix=/usr/local
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0rc3 is out
2006-09-26 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Hello, This compiles cleanly and runs fine for me. Bests, Attila
milter-greylist 3.0rc3 is out
2006-09-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... Obviously I overlooked it. The real issue is that I cannot simply check that it builds, since undefining HAVE_VSYSLOG will cause a redefinition of vsyslog
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0rc2 is out
2006-09-26 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Hello, Emmanuel, why have you changed again the line syslog(level, %s , messagebuffer); to syslog(level, messagebug); ? ... So syslog(3) requires a format
Re: [milter-greylist] 2 mailservers and greylist
2006-09-26 by Jobst Schmalenbach
... Not mine ;-) It does have some oddities (greetpause, confRECEIVED_HEADER, and other stuff to hide what smtp server it is) but for the rest its a standard
milter-greylist 3.0rc2 is out
2006-09-25 by manu@netbsd.org
http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-3.0rc2.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-3.0rc2.tgz) = 445604a69f90647ad4438bbc9c1d362e Changes since rc1:
Re: [milter-greylist] 2 mailservers and greylist
2006-09-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... I have real trouble to understand how your problem happen. Perhaps an odd sendmail.cf? THat s beyond my knowledge. :-/ -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: [milter-greylist] 2 mailservers and greylist
2006-09-25 by Jobst Schmalenbach
... Yes, without is (or alternatively with the other gray -milter) it works, with milter-greylist-3.0a1 on the main MX server it has trouble. Is there a
Suggestion: Temporary disable option
2006-09-22 by Jobst Schmalenbach
Hi. Since greylist.conf gets read after each change a good idea would be to have a disable option within the config file. This way one can temporary
Re: [milter-greylist] x-greylist header suggestion
2006-09-21 by Jobst Schmalenbach
... I dont think this would be a good idea. You are giving to much info away. jobst -- My Carpenter has a 1956 VW Beetle. He still can go to any place in
Re: [milter-greylist] x-greylist header suggestion
2006-09-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... You already have this in the log. Is there a real need for having it in the header? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
x-greylist header suggestion
2006-09-21 by George Elgin
it sure might be useful if the acl(s) that caused the delay were posted in the mail header. seems like i have several that might have `hit`
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0rc1 is out
2006-09-20 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I had so few feedbacks on alpha6 that I decided to skip the beta stage. I m not sure it was a right move, but here we are. ... No idea, we ll see with
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.0rc1 is out
2006-09-20 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Should not we call it beta instead of release candidate? In the series two we had beta, for example: 2.0b5. About the systems with missing vsyslog() again.
RE: [milter-greylist] configuration file update
2006-09-20 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Yes, it fixes. But now the previous MX sync problem on Tru64 UNIX shows up again. Is it possible to apply the previous fflush() patch again? Did this patch
milter-greylist 3.0rc1 is out
2006-09-20 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Here is 3.0rc1: http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-3.0rc1.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-3.0rc1.tgz) = b9bd8dc226ef54dc1ced49eeb6bd91b2
Re: [milter-greylist] configuration file update
2006-09-19 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... That seems to be the fix: Index: milter-greylist.c =================================================================== RCS file:
Re: [milter-greylist] configuration file update
2006-09-19 by AIDA Shinra
At Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:03:40 +0200, ... It is a bug introduced at 3.0a6. The conf_cold is always 1.
Re: [milter-greylist] configuration file update
2006-09-19 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... It s a bug. I also noticed it. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
configuration file update
2006-09-19 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
Hello, The milter-greylist version 3.0a6 does not always reread the configuration file if there is a new one available. The version 2.1.4 always reads it. Is
Re: [milter-greylist] 2 mailservers and greylist
2006-09-18 by Jobst Schmalenbach
... Have to do it on the next weekend ... I ran out of time this weekend. jobst -- The future isn t what it used to be (it never was). __, Jobst Schmalenbach,
Re: [milter-greylist] 2 mailservers and greylist
2006-09-17 by manu@netbsd.org
... Try to change only one item at a time. Test your server by doing a telnet to port 25 and speaking SMTP. You get relaying denied. Now edit sendmail.cf,
Re: [milter-greylist] 2 mailservers and greylist
2006-09-16 by Jobst Schmalenbach
... I have no problem (its running now) when I use a different greylisting milter and has been for years. I know, too, that the relaying between the two is
Re: [milter-greylist] 2 mailservers and greylist
2006-09-16 by manu@netbsd.org
... That looks like a sendmail configuration issue. If you test your server by doing a telnet on port 25, does enabling/disabling milter-greylist change the
2 mailservers and greylist
2006-09-16 by Jobst Schmalenbach
All, I have 2 mailservers, a main server (MX 10) and a backup server (MX 100). However, when some mailservers connect to the main server and get a tempfail,
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-15 by Matt Kettler
... *IF* you include an acl xxx default , it must be at the bottom, even in 2.0b2. However, AFAIK the 2.x series assumes greylist for anything not matched by
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-15 by Jack L. Stone
... That s where I have always kept it through the many past versions ever since we had more and more custom specific rules to apply to certain targets --