Milter-greylist

in addition to the sorbs one (mentioned in man page) these
are some i am testing. does anyone have
suggestions/corrections ?

one thing i am noticing is that MANY spammers are SPF
compliant; since i am built against spf2 (don't do -S) i
think these checks below are getting bypassed (not
a good thing).


#       http://bl.csma.biz/#use
dnsrbl "MCFADDEN"  bl.csma.biz 127.0.0.2
dnsrbl "SCORE"  sbl.csma.biz 127.0.0.2
acl greylist dnsrbl "SCORE" delay 15m
acl greylist dnsrbl "MCFADDEN" delay 15m

#       http://www.njabl.org/use.html
dnsrbl "DYNABLOCK"  dynablock.njabl.org 127.0.0.3
acl greylist dnsrbl "DYNABLOCK" delay 4h
dnsrbl "DNSBLNJABL"  dnsbl.njabl.org 127.0.0.4
acl greylist dnsrbl "DNSBLNJABL" delay 4h

dnsrbl "SPAM HAUS"  sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org 127.0.0.4
acl greylist dnsrbl "SPAM HAUS" delay 4h

dnsrbl "NOMOREFUN"  no-more-funn.moensted.dk 127.0.0.2
acl greylist dnsrbl "NOMOREFUN" delay 45m
dnsrbl "BLACKHOLES"  blackholes.five-ten-sg.com 127.0.0.2
acl greylist dnsrbl "BLACKHOLES" delay 15m


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Tere.
> in addition to the sorbs one (mentioned in man page) these
> are some i am testing. does anyone have
> suggestions/corrections ?
>
>   
All good rules, actually some servers are new for me.

But I noticed other issue, usually every smtp server uses also RBL
servers to block spam and so do I. But if rule order counts, then at
least in me sendmail.mc dnsbl rules are BEFORE than milter-greylist rules.

So I presume, that first sendmail dnsbl rules deny all senders listed in
rbl servers and later milter-greylist just delays these sender, who pass
the sendmail dnsbl rules.

Using different rbl servers in sendmail and milter-greylist, may give
some result, but usually most rbl serves includes quite identical data,
so seems, that if I'm using sendmail dnsbl rules, there is no point to
use milter-greylist dnsbl at all?

-- 
Mart