At 08:26 AM 9.15.2006 -0500, Michael Osten wrote: > >>>> >>>> I was just reading that, but in the default greylist.conf file the >>>> "acl greylist default" was not at the bottom of the file. >>> >>> mkettler> Sounds like a bug in the default config for your >>> release. Do you >>> have 3.0a1? mkettler> That's the only version that I have that >>> suffers from >>> this bug, but my mkettler> collection is not comprehensive. >>> >>> mkettler> 3.0a2 and higher have correctly moved it to the bottom >>> of the >>> file. >>> >>> mkettler> 2.1.2-5 and 2.0.2 don't even have the word "default" in >>> the file >>> at all. >>> >>> I feel that `default' is not a good keyword then. It sounds to me >>> that the location in greylist.conf doesn't matter. Something like >>> `any' is better, IMHO. > > >Ok, so then I'm confused. Does 2.1.2-5 require that the "acl >greylist default" be at the bottom of the file? Or is "default" not a >valid option for this version? >-- >Michael Osten > That's where I have always kept it through the many past versions ever since we had more and more custom specific "rules" to apply to certain targets -- then everything else thereafter naturally applied to the normal greylisting rule. It *needs* to be last -- as long as you allow recipients in you didn't expect emails from. I really like the configurable things that have been added over the past couple of years. MGL has really matured into a powerful program and much praise to Emmanuel and those that are capable of contributing those great patches! IMHO from just a dumb user.... (^_^) Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] milter greylist ignoring whitelist of ip.
2006-09-15 by Jack L. Stone
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.