Re: [milter-greylist] 4.1.6 and spf
2008-10-03 by manu@netbsd.org
... I always run configure before releasing so that the spec file is up to date. That also produces a Makefile, which is not suitable for any setup, but that
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 50 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
2008-10-03 by manu@netbsd.org
... I always run configure before releasing so that the spec file is up to date. That also produces a Makefile, which is not suitable for any setup, but that
2008-10-02 by Joe Pruett
... i just did some testing with rpmbuild -t and it just grabs the .spec file from inside the tarball and uses it directly. so i think that having a spec.in
2008-10-02 by Joe Pruett
... i just looked at the cvs and a slightly different version of my change is in there so the next release should have it.
2008-10-02 by Joe Pruett
... i think i found the patch that greg sent in and that isn t it. so it looks like that line didn t make it in. i ll use -U4 from now on. i haven t setup
2008-10-02 by Joe Pruett
... ah, i didn t even think about that. i m not sure i see the purpose of a spec.in file. if you re using rpm, you aren t going to run configure first. you
2008-10-02 by Joe Pruett
... that was pulled from the diff i had sent in before. somehow that line didn t get updated in what is 4.1.6. i was just trying to verify if that was what
2008-10-02 by manu@netbsd.org
... Don t you also want to patch milter-greylist.spec.in? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2008-10-02 by manu@netbsd.org
... Is that against CVS? Also, please use cvs diff -U4, it helps. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2008-10-02 by Joe Pruett
attached is the spec diff for libspf2. enable with: --define build_libspf2 1 --- /home/joey/milter-greylist-4.1.6/milter-greylist.spec 2008-09-28
2008-10-02 by Joe Pruett
... it looks like one line of my patch didn t make it in. was it this that you fixed in acl.c? 1941c1966
2008-10-02 by manu@netbsd.org
... What software do you use for your local whois server? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2008-10-02 by Greg Troxel
it also seems that my nolog logic isn t working. the config file is accepted, but logging still happens. i ll dig into this more later. I fixed a bug where
2008-10-02 by Joe Pruett
it was in the release notes, that s why i was confused. it also seems that my nolog logic isn t working. the config file is accepted, but logging still
2008-10-02 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I must have missed it, go ahead and resend. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2008-10-02 by Joe Pruett
my spf changes to the spec file didn t actually make it into the release. do you need a patch again?
2008-10-02 by Patrick Domack
I am running it like this, since I have several ip s on this server but only one for email: p0f -l -Q /var/run/p0f.socket -0 -o /dev/null -d dst host
2008-10-02 by manu@netbsd.org
Hello I am playing this p0f and milter-greylist, but I have a problem with p0f log file getting quite big over time. I have not found the answer on the net, so
2008-10-02 by Johann Klasek
... Ok, got it ... If no one protests and no further discussion happens ... see attachment ;) Johann ... +++ spamd.c Thu Oct 2 12:00:21 2008 @@ -87,7 +87,6 @@
2008-10-02 by manu@netbsd.org
... It does, but please send a patch! -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2008-10-01 by Johann Klasek
Hi folks, great work, but just want to add some quick comments which may lead to changes ... On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:07:09PM +0200, Manuel Badzong wrote:
2008-10-01 by manu@netbsd.org
... Got it. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2008-10-01 by manu@netbsd.org
... Checked in. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2008-10-01 by Manuel Badzong
Here s another patch for spamd.c. Fixes a call to freeaddrinfo() with bad pointer. Manuel
2008-09-29 by Greg Troxel
... I get the same error, and the code seems wrong. acl.h includes spf.h, and spf.h includes acl.h. Because of inclusion protection, the definitions of acl
2008-09-29 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Well, I confused some stuff here. You can t get the same error, since you excluded the spf-support (like I did, when I trumpeted in my previous mail that
2008-09-29 by Greg Troxel
I think this is introduced by Manuel Badzong s contribution. I guess that if you add a dacl whitelist default nolog You ll get it fixed for free. Perhaps the
2008-09-29 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Eh, yes, thanks for the info. Removing --with-libspf_alt=/usr/pkg did the trick without any need for additional patching.
2008-09-29 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I think this is introduced by Manuel Badzong s contribution. I guess that if you add a dacl whitelist default nolog You ll get it fixed for free. Perhaps
2008-09-29 by Greg Troxel
I ve updated to CVS from this morning, both to get up to date and to continue trying to get p0f to work (with postfix). The code built fine on NetBSD/i386
2008-09-29 by Kai Schaetzl
... These figures are *very* misleading. AFAIK, only the big mail providers and a few enterprises and others are using it. They seem to have tested only these.
2008-09-29 by Petar Bogdanovic
... draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-03 should cover this, but it s still draft: This document describes the records that authors domains can use to advertise their
2008-09-29 by Petar Bogdanovic
... # uname -a # NetBSD starling.smokva.net 4.0 NetBSD 4.0 (STARLING) #0: Thu Jan 24 14:30:56 UTC 2008 root@starling.smokva.net:/tmp/netbsd/STARLING i386 #
2008-09-29 by Ondrej Valousek
Hi List, I was thinking about the DKIM support recently, and I must say I am not sure about its usefulness. Why? 1. DACL only. Even worse, at rcpt stage you
2008-09-28 by Jack L. Stone
2008-09-28 by manu@netbsd.org
... What about a quick search for syslog in greylist.conf(5) man page? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2008-09-28 by Joe Pruett
... in the config file: logfac local2
2008-09-28 by Petar Bogdanovic
2008-09-28 by Jack L. Stone
2008-09-28 by manu@netbsd.org
Here is milter-greylist 4.1.6: http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-4.1.6.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-4.1.6.tgz) =
2008-09-28 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... Not that much and I use different whois servers depending on the domain tld. I m sure I would be blocked if the whois system hit a threshold
2008-09-28 by Greg Troxel
... Thanks. This was feeling tricky, and I haven t updated/built/tried it yet - I ll read the man page :-)
2008-09-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... Manuel included such an example in the man greylist.conf(5) page. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2008-09-27 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Since a few hours, some of our machines are running milter-greylist from cvs (checked out around 15:00 CEST) with the following configuration: racl
2008-09-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... Got it. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2008-09-27 by Greg Troxel
... There s a slippery slope here to reimplementing all of spamassassin. Instead, I think it makes sense to have milter-greylist include the functionality of
2008-09-27 by Manuel Badzong
The following patch fixes a typo in spamd.c and fixes a missing include in acl.h (didn t build on netbsd with gcc 4.1.2). Manuel diff -ruN
2008-09-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, it would be nice to have a DATA-stage ACl clause that would lookup URL found in the message against domain black lists. This is a bit complicated to
2008-09-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... How many query per minute do you forward? Perhaps this is the explanation. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2008-09-27 by Manuel Badzong
... Thanks. There was a small typo in spamd_inet_socket. I also removed unnecassary code. Patch attached. Cheers, Manuel diff -ruN milter-greylist/spamd.c
2008-09-27 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Eh, yes, that s truly simple.. But without SA you ll miss all the DOB domains in the body.