Joe Pruett <joey@...> wrote: > ah, i didn't even think about that. i'm not sure i see the purpose of a > spec.in file. if you're using rpm, you aren't going to run configure > first. you just grab the spec and tar file and go. but i know there is > some rpmbuild option that starts from just a tar file, but i have never > used that method. i would guess it just uses the .spec file as well. can > anyone else speak to this? I always run configure before releasing so that the spec file is up to date. That also produces a Makefile, which is not suitable for any setup, but that is easier to hack if configure does not want to help at all. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] 4.1.6 and spf
2008-10-03 by manu@netbsd.org
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.