Greg Troxel <gdt@...> wrote: > I think the implicit whitelist rule should be nolog - it's not really > news or interesting. I added nolog, and then found that I had to > suppress logging if nolog was set. So even if you don't want to apply > the first hunk, the second is a bugfix - I think your suggestion > wouldn't work without it. Checked in. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.1.6 is available
2008-10-01 by manu@netbsd.org