>> attached is the spec diff for libspf2. enable with: >> >> --define 'build_libspf2 1' > > Don't you also want to patch milter-greylist.spec.in? ah, i didn't even think about that. i'm not sure i see the purpose of a spec.in file. if you're using rpm, you aren't going to run configure first. you just grab the spec and tar file and go. but i know there is some rpmbuild option that starts from just a tar file, but i have never used that method. i would guess it just uses the .spec file as well. can anyone else speak to this?
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] 4.1.6 and spf
2008-10-02 by Joe Pruett