Re: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libpspf2 & libspf-alt cause milter-greylist memory leak
2008-10-24 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Anyone voluntering for reporitng the bugs to various libspf maintainers? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Messages
Browse messages
Page 49 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libpspf2 & libspf-alt cause milter-greylist memory leak
2008-10-24 by Petar Bogdanovic
... milter-greylist using libspf-alt leaks too but I didn t try to patch it. A quick check reveals that they don t use res_ndestroy() either: [petar@pintail
Re: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libpspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak
2008-10-24 by manu@netbsd.org
... Well, the logic seems good, but there may be some corner cases we did not think about. This is why I said there *may* be a problem on some setups... --
Re: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libpspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak
2008-10-24 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu People using --enable-dnsrbl may also have a problem on some systems. manu dnsrbl.c contains: manu #if (defined(res_ninit) || (__RES =
HEADS-UP: libpspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak
2008-10-24 by manu@netbsd.org
... I have nothing to add about libspf2, I just changed the title so that other people do not miss that. People using --enable-dnsrbl may also have a problem
Re: [milter-greylist] DOes SPF cause memory leak?
2008-10-23 by Petar Bogdanovic
... I did use the current version (1.2.5). See LOCALPATCHES. ... Yes, please!
Re: [milter-greylist] DOes SPF cause memory leak?
2008-10-23 by Fredrik Pettai
... Did you really used libspf2 from pkgsrc? I only find the current version to be 1.2.5 in there (but it seems to miss res_ndestroy() patch(es)) I ll see if I
Re: [milter-greylist] DOes SPF cause memory leak?
2008-10-23 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Thanks, I applied all patches (~10) from the FreeBSD Ports tree and the problem is gone. The memory usage of milter-greylist is actually frozen now, no
Re: [milter-greylist] DOes SPF cause memory leak?
2008-10-23 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... petar It apparently has nothing to do with libspf since I get similar results petar with libspf_alt and libspf2 (1.2.8). The situation even got worse
Re: [milter-greylist] DOes SPF cause memory leak?
2008-10-23 by Petar Bogdanovic
... It apparently has nothing to do with libspf since I get similar results with libspf_alt and libspf2 (1.2.8). The situation even got worse with libspf2 from
Re: [milter-greylist] DOes SPF cause memory leak?
2008-10-23 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... libspf (neither alt, nor 2) Reading the documentation, it seems that for libspf, SPF_close does not free memory,and free() must be called on the
Re: [milter-greylist] DOes SPF cause memory leak?
2008-10-23 by Petar Bogdanovic
... libspf_alt I will try mail/libspf2 from pkgsrc but which one is the third one?
DOes SPF cause memory leak?
2008-10-23 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:17:15AM +0200, Petar Bogdanovic wrote: [SPF may be the culprit for memory leaks] Which libspf do you use? We support 3 of them. The
Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption
2008-10-23 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Thanks for the hint, I forgot that nospf is not default. Take a look at the new results: ************************************************ with spf
Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption
2008-10-23 by Petar Bogdanovic
... I m not sure why we ve shifted the focus on the in-memory db: The test I did will never cause any greylist tuples being created in the database since no
Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption
2008-10-23 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
FWIW, at mine, milter-greylist memory consumption raise up to about 50 megabytes. It is difficult to say if that is a memory leak, As I restart it about once a
Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption
2008-10-23 by Benoit Branciard
... Yes, milter-greylist has some memory leaks, at least with some compilation options. I have set up a cron to restart it every time it hits the 1GB VSZ
Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption
2008-10-23 by manu@netbsd.org
... It was just to keep it simple: no external dependency, and there is no obvious speed tradeoff. I am not even sure the memory leaks are caused by the
Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption
2008-10-23 by Patrick Domack
I use milter-greylist on my personal email, and it s been great, and the 2.x code, and the current development code both don t leak memory on my system, holds
Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption
2008-10-22 by Mark Walker
Is the decision to keep data in memory as opposed to some sort of database a speed issue? It seems that there would be a lot of benefit to keeping the active
Re: {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] memory consumption
2008-10-22 by Petar Bogdanovic
... There is no way to create a greylist tuple without using at least one `[rd]acl greylist statement in the configuration file.
Re: {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] memory consumption
2008-10-22 by Kai Schaetzl
... You mean it should have released that memory after test? The whole db is hold in memory. So, the more triplets it holds the bigger the process grows. You
Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption
2008-10-22 by shuttlebox
... I have tuned my settings so the dumped database file always is around 20 MB which to me means the database in memory is the same size as well. Still
Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption
2008-10-22 by Oliver Fromme
... milter-greylist keeps all data (all triples) in memory. So it is expected that it will grow if new triples come in faster than old triples are expired,
memory consumption
2008-10-22 by Petar Bogdanovic
Hi, I just did some stress-testing on milter-greylist in order to test its memory consumption and it seems that there are some leaks to be found. The test was
Re: [milter-greylist] Anybody having trouble with Google mail spam?
2008-10-20 by manu@netbsd.org
... Well, you tend to block a sending IP or network when you think you will block much more spam than legitimate messages. This explains the latest spammer
Re: [milter-greylist] Anybody having trouble with Google mail spam?
2008-10-20 by Richard Frovarp
... You don t have to trust them. Trust is always assuming someone or something is on the up and up. You don t have to trust gmail, you just can t execute
Re: [milter-greylist] Anybody having trouble with Google mail spam?
2008-10-20 by Mark Walker
Thanks, I ll be diligent about notifying abuse and adding an SA rule. My users can get pretty uppity when messages are blocked, especially if they re entirely
Re: [milter-greylist] Anybody having trouble with Google mail spam?
2008-10-20 by Richard Frovarp
... Well, greylisting only stops smtps that don t follow the RFCs. Since Google will follow the retry it makes sense to have them in the whitelist. Just make
Re: [milter-greylist] Anybody having trouble with Google mail spam?
2008-10-20 by Greg Troxel
... I am getting a fair bit of spam from google, and it s usually DKIM signed as gmail.com. I forward it to abuse and they don t claim it s not them. From a
Re: [~Disarmed~] [milter-greylist] Anybody having trouble with Google mail spam?
2008-10-20 by Eduardo Casarero
Do you use spf in milter-greylist? Mark Walker escribi: It s a problem because Google IPs are white listed by default on my system, and it could cause a
Anybody having trouble with Google mail spam?
2008-10-20 by Mark Walker
It s a problem because Google IPs are white listed by default on my system, and it could cause a problem blacklisting a Google server. I ve received numerous
Re: [milter-greylist] Couple of questions...
2008-10-07 by Rick Knight
... Thanks, I also had my new line character wrong. I had /n instead of n. I read the wiki and looked at the man pages. I also read the installation part of
Re: [milter-greylist] Couple of questions...
2008-10-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... Um, reading the doc, it s and not , actually. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] Couple of questions...
2008-10-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... What about adding a n at the end of your format string? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] Couple of questions...
2008-10-07 by Rick Knight
... I ve tried adding the new line character to the end of the command but that didn t work. Just produced an empty file. Thanks, Rick
Re: [milter-greylist] Couple of questions...
2008-10-07 by Rick Knight
... Ok, I have the syntax correct for prepending to the command. When I look at the new log file, everything is one line. Is there a way to have each event
Re: [milter-greylist] Couple of questions...
2008-10-07 by Rick Knight
... So I would want to change the line to ... ? ... %T{%Y/%m/%d %T} %d [%i] %r - %f %S (ACL %A) %Xc %Xe %Xm %Xh Thanks, Rick
Re: [milter-greylist] Couple of questions...
2008-10-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... Your stat output must be prepended by if it is a file or by | if it is a pipeline. ... Sure. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
Couple of questions...
2008-10-07 by Rick Knight
I have just installed milter-greylist on my server and it seems to be working pretty well, but I have a couple of questions. First, how do I get the logging to
Re: [milter-greylist] make -j?
2008-10-04 by manu@netbsd.org
... If you are heading that way, add a configure test for yacc -o (should not be very hard), and produce an appropriate output. For instance, Makefile.in could
Re: [milter-greylist] make -j?
2008-10-03 by Joe Pruett
i have no idea if there might be other systems that mg would run on that have a yacc that doesn t have -o. the last time i thought about this was unix v7 on a
Re: [milter-greylist] make -j?
2008-10-03 by Greg Troxel
The NetBSD yacc man page indicates that it s POSIX.2 compliant, and doesn t say that -o is an extension, so I m hoping it is safe to use. With this, I did a
Re: [milter-greylist] make -j?
2008-10-03 by Greg Troxel
Thanks. I set MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=no in the pkgsrc entry, and here s a doc patch: Index: README ===================================================================
Re: [milter-greylist] make -j?
2008-10-03 by Joe Pruett
... the makefile is not safe with -j. the .y.c rule uses the old yacc logic where the yacc file is turned into y.tab.c and then renamed. that isn t safe for
make -j?
2008-10-03 by Greg Troxel
Do people think make -j3 works? I was building 4.0.1 from pkgsrc on NetBSD 4 i386 with MAKE_JOBS=3 and got: ... cc -O2 -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/include
Re: [milter-greylist] 4.1.6 and spf
2008-10-03 by Joe Pruett
... in that case, you can apply the same spec patch to spec.in.
Re: [milter-greylist] Recent domain name creations
2008-10-03 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... http://wp-whois-proxy.sourceforge.net/ Regards, Michael.
Re: [milter-greylist] 4.1.6 and spf
2008-10-03 by Joe Pruett
... that is already handled by: --define build_user smmsp
Re: [milter-greylist] 4.1.6 and spf
2008-10-03 by Michael Mansour
Hi John, ... You also need to add a patch to change the ownerships of this directory: drwxr-xr-x 2 smmsp smmsp 4096 Oct 3 15:07 /var/milter-greylist/ ie.