Milter-greylist

Port forwarding is what you want to use, but in your case, it's also  
has nat when using port forwarding. Sound like a config/setup issue,  
maybe update the firmware on your unit? Then portforwarding won't be  
nat'd.


Quoting Rick Knight <rick_knight@...>:

> Yes, I can go back to the previous configuration. I was trying to cut
> down on some equipment and save a bit on power consumption by getting
> rid of the PC that was running just the PPPoE, firewall and routing.
>
> Can anyone recommend a cheap wireless router  that will for me?  I
> guess  I need a more configurable NAT along with port forwarding for
> other services.
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
> Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:58:38AM -0700, Rick Knight wrote:
>> > So I need to NAT the SMTP traffic directly to the mail server, not
>> using
>> > port forwarding, just NAT?
>> >
>> > I don't see a way to do that in my router. In fact, I have very little
>> > control over the router's NAT functions.
>>
>> You said it stopped working: if it worked before, then you can go back
>> to your previous configuration.
>>
>> --
>> Emmanuel Dreyfus
>> manu@... <mailto:manu%40netbsd.org>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>