Milter-greylist

Folks,

G'day.

One requirement for moving a specification from Proposed to Draft status is to
supply an Implementation Report:

      <http://www.ietf.org/IESG/implementation.html>

      <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dusseault-impl-reports-04>

I've put together survey forms -- one for signers and one for verifiers -- that
should supply us with some raw field data, to make it possible to assemble a
detailed report.


     *   If you run a DKIM signing and/or verifying operation, please complete
         the appropriate survey questionnaire and return it to me.

     *   If you know of others operate DKIM signing and/or verifying services --
         such as your customers -- please forward this to them and request that
         they complete a version, returning it to me.


Because the report seeks information about interoperability, it does not ask
about the capabilities of software, but rather looks for actual usage.  It is
information about /interaction/ between software that is important, not merely
what code exists.  This is why real field data is sought, rather than a report
from developers.

I'm hoping we can get a useful set of responses by the time of the IETF meeting,
so that we can start considering the feedback.

Thanks!

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net