Milter-greylist

Folks,

G'day.

One requirement for moving a specification from Proposed to Draft status is to
supply an Implementation Report:

      <http://www.ietf.org/IESG/implementation.html>

      <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dusseault-impl-reports-04>

I've put together survey forms -- one for signers and one for verifiers -- that
should supply us with some raw field data, to make it possible to assemble a
detailed report.


     *   If you run a DKIM signing and/or verifying operation, please complete
         the appropriate survey questionnaire and return it to me.

     *   If you know of others operate DKIM signing and/or verifying services --
         such as your customers -- please forward this to them and request that
         they complete a version, returning it to me.


Because the report seeks information about interoperability, it does not ask
about the capabilities of software, but rather looks for actual usage.  It is
information about /interaction/ between software that is important, not merely
what code exists.  This is why real field data is sought, rather than a report
from developers.

I'm hoping we can get a useful set of responses by the time of the IETF meeting,
so that we can start considering the feedback.

Thanks!

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

>      *   If you run a DKIM signing and/or verifying operation, please complete
>          the appropriate survey questionnaire and return it to me.

I implemented verifying in milter-greylist but never used. Anyone can 
confirm it works?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@...

On Jul 20, 2009, at 6:20 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > * If you run a DKIM signing and/or verifying operation, please  
> complete
> > the appropriate survey questionnaire and return it to me.
>
> I implemented verifying in milter-greylist but never used. Anyone can
> confirm it works?
>

Somewhat late reply... but it works.
Cannot say that I tested all possible scenarios, but Gmail verified ok  
for me.

/P

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 04:20:20AM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> >      *   If you run a DKIM signing and/or verifying operation, please complete
> >          the appropriate survey questionnaire and return it to me.
> 
> I implemented verifying in milter-greylist but never used.

BTW, does the verifyer support ADSP?

   http://www.dkim.org/specs/draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-04.html
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Author_Domain_Signing_Practices
   http://www.sendmail.org/dkim/wizard



   Petar Bogdanovic

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:00:33PM +0200, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 04:20:20AM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > >      *   If you run a DKIM signing and/or verifying operation, please complete
> > >          the appropriate survey questionnaire and return it to me.
> > 
> > I implemented verifying in milter-greylist but never used.
> 
> BTW, does the verifyer support ADSP?

Sorry for the noise, ADSP seems to be nowhere yet:

   http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q1/011387.html
   http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q1/011389.html



   Petar Bogdanovic

Petar Bogdanovic <petar@...> wrote:

> > I implemented verifying in milter-greylist but never used.
> BTW, does the verifyer support ADSP?

No idea, we rely on an external library to do the job.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...