[PATCH] typo in README
2009-06-27 by Kouhei Sutou
Hi, I found a small typo in README: Index: README =================================================================== RCS file:
Messages
Browse messages
Page 41 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: p0f error smfi_getsymval failed
2009-06-26 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Then make sure the daemon_port macro is exported to milter-greylist. You must have a line like this in sendmail.cf: O Milter.macros.connect=H, j, _,
Re: p0f error smfi_getsymval failed
2009-06-26 by Florin Grosu
... No, I have sendmail, but it s on a different server. It connects to milter with a tcp port. On milter s server sendmail is running, but it does nothing,
Re: [milter-greylist] p0f error smfi_getsymval failed
2009-06-26 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... You use postfix? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
p0f error smfi_getsymval failed
2009-06-26 by Florin Grosu
Hello, The error is: milter-greylist: smfi_getsymval failed for {daemon_port}, using default smtp port Although this error does not affect the job of
Re: [milter-greylist] A less strict auto-whitelist?
2009-06-25 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... The problem is that you don t know the IP address from which the answer will come. So the real modification here is to modify the autowhitelist so that
A less strict auto-whitelist?
2009-06-24 by William Yang / CISSP
Hi. I have bastion MX servers which relay incoming messages after appropriate checks (virus, spam, standards, and greylist), but also relay outgoing messages
Re: [milter-greylist] Can I do dnsrbl lookups without doing whitelisting/blacklisting?
2009-06-16 by manu@netbsd.org
... I have been thinking for a while about a new ACL action: we have whitelist, blacklist and greylist, we could add continue. Such an ACL could trigger
Can I do dnsrbl lookups without doing whitelisting/blacklisting?
2009-06-16 by Delahunty, Mark
I would like to compare the effectiveness of two DNSRBLs hosted by our academic network provider. The only way I can think of to do this would be to let
Re: [milter-greylist] "not" keyword no more accepted in compound ACLs ?
2009-06-13 by manu@netbsd.org
... Definitively a bug. We ll have to dig the sources... -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
"not" keyword no more accepted in compound ACLs ?
2009-06-13 by Benoit Branciard
In our current production milter-greylist config (a 20080319 snapshot - basically a 4.0 version plus SPF status selection), we have several compound ACLs
Re: [milter-greylist] Problem with "libspf2"
2009-06-10 by Matthias Scheler
... I ve managed to write small program which reproduces the crash. It is definitely a bug in libspf2 and not in milter-greylist . Kind regards -- Matthias
Re: [milter-greylist] Problem with "libspf2"
2009-06-10 by Matthias Scheler
... Here it is: spf_expand.c:219 Error: Failed to allocate enough memory to expand string. Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x00007f7ffd5dbb1a in
Re: [milter-greylist] Problem with "libspf2"
2009-06-10 by Matthias Scheler
... Yes, I know. I was just wondering if anybody knew why that s happening. ... I m trying to. Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler
Re: [milter-greylist] Problem with "libspf2"
2009-06-10 by manu@netbsd.org
... That error comes from libspf2 itself. Could you collect a backtrace? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Problem with "libspf2"
2009-06-09 by Matthias Scheler
Hello, I m using 4.2.2 with libspf2 1.2.9 under NetBSD 5.0. In the last few weeks milter-greylist has has been crashing regulary on two mail servers. I ve
Re: [~Disarmed~] Re: [milter-greylist] Can I reject unknown recipients before doing a dnsrbl lookup?
2009-06-08 by Eduardo Casarero
... you can set up milter-ahead before greylisting in sendmail configuration. ... -- ... Eduardo Casarero Informatica Avanzada SRL Email:
Re: [milter-greylist] Can I reject unknown recipients before doing a dnsrbl lookup?
2009-06-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... Either include in the ACL the list of valid recipients (before the dnsrbl access line of course), or use ldapcheck or urlcheck to lookg it up from an
Can I reject unknown recipients before doing a dnsrbl lookup?
2009-06-08 by Delahunty, Mark
I use greylist dnsrbl and it is greylisting about 99% of the incoming mail. However, milter-greylist does the dnsrbl lookups for non-existent recipient
Re: [milter-greylist] greylist + dnsrbl
2009-05-25 by Darko
Linux redhat, 64 bits, 8 cpu, 16 GB ram. milter 4.x (newest). bind/named 9-px (newest)
Re: [milter-greylist] greylist + dnsrbl
2009-05-25 by Petar Bogdanovic
... `tested define the bind libdir ? `etc etc. ? ... You didn t provide any valuable information. You didn t even mention the milter-greylist version you re
greylist + dnsrbl
2009-05-25 by Darko
Hi folks. I tried dnsrbl on my servers. Compiled with dnsrbl, instaleld named and tested define the bind libdir etc etc. When i add a dnsrbl entry in my
Re: [milter-greylist] Missing no delay reason if autowhitelist match found
2009-05-23 by manu@netbsd.org
... Checked in. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
[milter-greylist] Missing no delay reason if autowhitelist match found
2009-05-19 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
Hello, I got the following strange log entry and header line for matching autowhitelisted entries: sendmail[ ]: : Milter add: header: X-Greylist:
schema attached
2009-05-19 by Piotr Wadas
Attaching simple schema I use with ldap tests. Note, that it s related to standard sendmail.schema, available from sendmail site, replace sendmailMTAKey with
solving
2009-05-18 by Piotr Wadas
There s something wrong with function ldapcheck_validate (ldapcheck.c), returned props are not strcmp ed at all (retval is always 0). Additionally, when
Re: [milter-greylist] dnsrbl urlcheck syntax explanation
2009-05-18 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I am almost AFK until next sunday. I will get back on this problem then. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
RE: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-18 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Hello, This works well for me both on Tru64 UNIX and on Linux. Thanks. Bests, Attila
Re: [milter-greylist] dnsrbl urlcheck syntax explanation
2009-05-17 by Piotr Wadas
Tested with ldapcheck and urlcheck - both cases property returned from ldap is exactly the same as the word in racl configuration line, anyway ACL does not
Re: [milter-greylist] dnsrbl urlcheck syntax explanation
2009-05-17 by Piotr Wadas
From the presentation, ... I expect a defined rbl dnsrbl RBL2 my.server.com 127.0.0.2 should work with ldapcheck property of particular attribute containing
Re: [milter-greylist] dnsrbl urlcheck syntax explanation
2009-05-17 by Piotr Wadas
I m still fighting with prop usage. When incoming message is on its way, I got the following in verbose log: Querying ldap://127.0.0.1 got prop $dnsrbl =
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-16 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... ume It seems your idea is good to me. However, we cannot use IPv6 where ume IPV6_V6ONLY is defined but is not usable. ume I think sync_listen()
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-16 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... attila I still feel it is an overhead to try attila to open a new socket for every new recipient, attila even if there is no error message about the
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-15 by manu@netbsd.org
... I will be AFK for the next week. I hope the issue will be settled then ... -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
RE: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-15 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Yes, I got it once. ... I still feel it is an overhead to try to open a new socket for every new recipient, even if there is no error message about the
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-15 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... attila In code I provided the IPv6 code is protected with attila #ifdef AF_INET6 attila So that should not be a problem for IPv4 only systems.
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-15 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... attila On my Tru64 UNIX system it looks working but I get attila milter-greylist: cannot start MX sync, bind failed: Address already in attila use
RE: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-15 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
Hello, ... On my Tru64 UNIX system it looks working but I get milter-greylist: cannot start MX sync, bind failed: Address already in use message for every
RE: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-15 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
Hello, ... I have tried on my system with IPv6 first and after the IPv4 and behaves exactly the same way as with the reverse order. I do not know on other
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-15 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu Um, it seems I committed too early. Shall I roll back the change? How about this patch? It is against fresh 4.3.2. I confirmed that it runs on
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-15 by manu@netbsd.org
... Um, it seems I committed too early. Shall I roll back the change? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-15 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... attila I have rearranged to code of sync_master_restart() to take into account attila that any of the sync_master thread can exit independently.
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-14 by manu@netbsd.org
... Checked in. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
[milter-greylist] MX synchronization loss critical bug
2009-05-14 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
Hello, Time to time I got the following error message in the log: milter-greylist: Unexpected reply 105 from peer a.b.c.d closing connection (0 entries
Re: [milter-greylist] Run MG on tcp socket
2009-05-14 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Yes, it is possible. Milter-greylist hands the -p argument to libmilter s smfi_setconn(), which actually use it. It means that the socket specification is
Re: [milter-greylist] dnsrbl urlcheck syntax explanation
2009-05-14 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... You don t need to duplicate the urlcheck clause: once it is evaluated, you have the fetched variables available for the remaining ACLs. ... urlcheck
Re: [milter-greylist] Removal of autowhitelist by another program or milter
2009-05-14 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Move the spamd-check into milter-greylist (man greylist.conf - spamd) and you won t have this problem. Then you ll also be able to block obvious spam
Removal of autowhitelist by another program or milter
2009-05-14 by Delahunty, Mark
Hi, I m new to the list. I just installed milter-greylist to test it out and it looks like a brilliant way to reduce the amount of rubbish flooding our mail
Run MG on tcp socket
2009-05-14 by Florin Grosu
Hello, I ve seen this subject before, but the answer was not explicit. To put it simple, I need to install milter-greylist on a different machine. So the mail
dnsrbl urlcheck syntax explanation
2009-05-14 by Piotr Wadas
Hello, Using milter-greylist 4.2+ from greylist.conf manual page # Here is an example that will use various DNSRBL depending on a #per-recipient setting