Re: {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] GeoIP is not available
2007-11-19 by Kai Schaetzl
... Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Messages
Browse messages
Page 64 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
GeoIP is not available
2007-11-17 by Big Wave Dave
I am seeing lots of the following in my logs: milter-greylist: GeoIP is not available However, I know that GeoIP is installed: [root@host ~]# rpm -qa | grep -i
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: failure in logs?
2007-11-17 by Jack L. Stone
I get the same errors if I have report=all in greylist.conf. Once I changed (back) to report=delays, the error message went away. I am running milter-greylist
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: failure in logs?
2007-11-17 by Jack L. Stone
... I get the same errors if I have report=all in greylist.conf. Once I changed (back) to report=delays, the error message went away. I am running
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: failure in logs?
2007-11-17 by Jack L. Stone
... I get the same errors if I have report=all in greylist.conf. Once I changed (back) to report=delays, the error message went away. I am running
Re: failure in logs?
2007-11-17 by Jim Hermann
... I get the same errors if I have report=all in greylist.conf. Once I changed (back) to report=delays, the error message went away. I am running
Re: [milter-greylist] failure in logs?
2007-11-17 by Jack L. Stone
... Jack L. Stone jacks@sage-american.com ... As far as I remeber, a local submission produces that. But it should remain a
Re: [milter-greylist] failure in logs?
2007-11-17 by manu@netbsd.org
... As far as I remeber, a local submission produces that. But it should remain a harmless warning. I thought I disabled it, but it s possible I missed one
Re: [milter-greylist] failure in logs?
2007-11-16 by Jack L. Stone
... Jack L. Stone jacks@sage-american.com ... Connexion from a non IP source (local socket?) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: [milter-greylist] failure in logs?
2007-11-16 by manu@netbsd.org
... Connexion from a non IP source (local socket?) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
failure in logs?
2007-11-16 by Jack L. Stone
Have just upgraded from GL-3.8 -- 4.0 Using FBSD-6.2x/sendmail-8.14x Noting repeats of this is the logs: Nov 16 12:09:54 mail milter-greylist: smfi_getsymval
Re: [milter-greylist] syntax error on dump file read
2007-11-16 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Theses are just harmless warnings. The tuple will not be reloaded, which will cause an extra delay in mail delivery, but that should not prevent
syntax error on dump file read
2007-11-16 by Johann E. Klasek
Hello all! Has anyone seen following startup error messages like these: Nov 16 00:27:18 tuvok milter-greylist: [ID 690954 mail.debug] unknown token ( line
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: DKIM vs domainkeys
2007-11-13 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Ok, that s how it works (I m discovering, I was completely clueless). That means DKIM and DomainKeys can only be checked in a DATA-stage ACL. At that time,
Re: DKIM vs domainkeys
2007-11-13 by Jim Hermann
... of ... Look at the HTML files in dkim-milter-2.3.2/libdkim/docs directory. It contains this Overview, among other API documentation: To verify a message
Re: [milter-greylist] DKIM vs domainkeys
2007-11-12 by manu@netbsd.org
... I m looking at libdkim and libdomainkeys, but both libs come with zero documentation on the API. Anyone has some experience with either of them? --
Re: DKIM vs domainkeys
2007-11-12 by Jim Hermann
... and ... else. ... I have not found a library that implments both standards. I have been using dk-filter for several months. It is flakey and hard to use.
Re: {Disarmed} Re: [milter-greylist] Re: DKIM vs domainkeys
2007-11-11 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... Both are. Yahoo implements DomainKeys, google implements DKIM. At some stage this year I ll be implementing an smtp proxy to sign outbounds
Re: Requests for Enhancement
2007-11-11 by Jim Hermann
... Version 4.0 Jim
Re: More SPF tests in CVS
2007-11-11 by Jim Hermann
... open ... I don t think that the spf self check will be too useful. I imagine that almost everyone has authorized more than one email server to send email
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: More SPF tests in CVS
2007-11-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Not yet, but that s something that would be desirable to implement. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: DKIM vs domainkeys
2007-11-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Is there a library that implement both protocols at the same time? If there isn t, which one is the most useful? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Requests for Enhancement
2007-11-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Ok, so that s a bug report, not a request for enhancement. Is it 4.0 or CVS? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: More SPF tests in CVS
2007-11-11 by Jim Hermann
... in ... pass), ... record, ... Can I substitute a different IP Address in this racl? Like this: racl blacklist spf 123.123.123.123 msg your SPF record is
Re: DKIM vs domainkeys
2007-11-11 by Jim Hermann
... support? No. They are separate standards. Yahoo develeped DomainKeys and still uses it. DKIM was the combinations of DK and something else. A valid DKIM
Re: Requests for Enhancement
2007-11-11 by Jim Hermann
... precedance ... It s hard to give an example of something that does nothing. greylist.conf settings: report delays racl whitelist addr 64.233.162.0/24 spf
Re: [milter-greylist] DKIM vs domainkeys
2007-11-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Sure, but I won t link with a perl module :-) Anyone knows about libkdim? Is it good enough? http://sourceforge.net/projects/libdkim/ -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: [milter-greylist] DKIM vs domainkeys
2007-11-11 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... The DKIM perl module I use has both DKIM and DomainKeys support. Reading the SpamAssassin v310.pre file: # DomainKeys - perform DomainKeys
DKIM vs domainkeys
2007-11-11 by manu@netbsd.org
Hello A quick question for DKIM/DomainKeys users: I m looking at DKIM/DomainKeys. DKIM seems to be an evolution of DomainKeys. Is there a need for supporting
Re: [milter-greylist] More SPF tests in CVS
2007-11-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... You can set up your ACL to perform whatever you want based on the SPF status. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] More SPF tests in CVS
2007-11-11 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... That sounds like an excellent feature, so basically with SPF pass we could simply not greylist for them? (even though I realise some spammers
Re: [milter-greylist] Requests for Enhancement
2007-11-10 by manu@netbsd.org
... I must confess I did not understood what you want. Another try with a complete example (the ACL and what you want to happen exactly)? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Requests for Enhancement
2007-11-10 by Jim Hermann
Would it be possible to allow the report parameter to take precedance in a racl whitelist line? I have report = delays, so I don t clutter undelayed email with
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.0 release candidate 1
2007-11-10 by manu@netbsd.org
... I ve written a patch for adding optionnal acl id strings, like this: racl foo greylist default The foo keyword can be substituted from %a in format
More SPF tests in CVS
2007-11-10 by manu@netbsd.org
Hello everybody With the help of Benoit Branciard, we added a larger set of SPF tests in ACL clauses. You can now test a particular SPF status (e.g.: spf
Re: [milter-greylist] acl and racl
2007-11-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... From greylist.conf(5): BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY (...) milter-greylist(8) also used to only have a RCPT-stage ACL, which was configured through acl
acl and racl
2007-11-07 by Michael Mansour
Hi, My greylist.conf has acl parameters for all my acl rules. This is from the older milter-greylist 3.x days. Looking at 4.0, should I now be changing all
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist: smfi_getsymval failed for {i}
2007-11-05 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... Latest stable - 4. Btw, when I removed the line (smf-clamd): define(`confMILTER_MACROS_ENVFROM , `{msg_size} )dnl the error was gone. -- Mart
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist: smfi_getsymval failed for {i}
2007-11-05 by manu@netbsd.org
... Warning. What version of milter-greylist is it? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
milter-greylist: smfi_getsymval failed for {i}
2007-11-05 by Mart Pirita
Tere. What does this line in logs mean? Is this error on warning? I m using in sendmail.mc:
Re: [milter-greylist] libspf.org
2007-11-05 by Johann E. Klasek
... Right, I encountered also some problems to get libsp2 working, too (depending on the actual platform). Some RPM provider offers SPEC files and patches, to
RE: [milter-greylist] libspf.org
2007-11-04 by Jason Bertoch
... I ve had bad experience with that library. If I recall correctly, it isn t the next generation of libspf. Instead it s a knock-off and an unfortunate
Re: [milter-greylist] libspf.org
2007-11-04 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... jason Does anyone know what happened to www.libspf.org? It redirects to jason intranet.prometheanworld.com and the maintainer of that site said they
libspf.org
2007-11-04 by Jason Bertoch
Does anyone know what happened to www.libspf.org? It redirects to intranet.prometheanworld.com and the maintainer of that site said they aren t related.
Re: Fake/wildcard SPF domain rejection
2007-11-04 by Jim Hermann
... server ... from my ... I require spf pass results for any whitelist IP Address where the expected domain name has a SPF record. Even a whitelisted IP
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Fake/wildcard SPF domain rejection
2007-11-03 by manu@netbsd.org
... Well, what s the point of doing a SPF lookup for them? They should be whitelisted earlier in the ACL. ... Or a user-configurable netblock in which the
Re: Fake/wildcard SPF domain rejection
2007-11-03 by Jim Hermann
... code ... open SPF ... Unless it was a SPF Record for our own domain. ;) My incoming server gets email from domains that are also authorized to send email
Re: [milter-greylist] Can greylisting at A cause failure to send from A to B ?
2007-11-02 by Chris Hoogendyk
... OK. I see that now in the greylist.conf and its man page. It (delayedreject) is commented out in our greylist.conf. Now, I ve never been aware of having
Re: [milter-greylist] Can greylisting at A cause failure to send from A to B ?
2007-11-02 by manu@netbsd.org
... According to what you forwarded, SF uses a sender-callback to check sender e-mail address is valid. milter-greylist has the delayedreject statement for
Can greylisting at A cause failure to send from A to B ?
2007-11-02 by choogendyk
I hope that title makes sense. I want to get the take of the milter-greylist community on the exchange that I ve forwarded below, since all of what they are