Re: testing milter connection
2008-01-04 by Stuart Freedman
You can try to add a few hacks to milter-watch: http://www.itg.uiuc.edu/itg_software/milter_watch/ Stuart
Messages
Browse messages
Page 63 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] Selective lazyaw?
2008-01-03 by Matthias Scheler
... You could just whitelist the domain .google.com . Sendmail prevents rDNS spoofing so it is safe to do that. And greylisting real SMTP servers is useless
Selective lazyaw?
2008-01-03 by Mart Pirita
Tere. I m very happy with milter-gerylist, but users, who receive messages from gmail, are not, as some messages arrives day or more late. The reason is amount
testing milter connection
2008-01-03 by Rene Luria
does someone already have a sample code to emulate sendmail connection to a milter ? just a bit of code to test if a milter is up or not... (not only connect,
Re: [milter-greylist] Reporting Multiple Hits?
2007-12-30 by manu@netbsd.org
... Have you tried the stat configuration option? It allows you to get a custom feed of milter-greylist activity, sent in a file or in a pipe. -- Emmanuel
Re: [milter-greylist] Reporting Multiple Hits?
2007-12-29 by manu@netbsd.org
... I was thinking about reusing for MX sync protocol for real-time monitoring. We could just connect to a localhost TCP port, send a command, and have the
Re: [milter-greylist] configurable umask for greylist.db ?
2007-12-29 by manu@netbsd.org
... I implemented it in the CVS version. Check it out, give it a try, and report any problem. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.0rc2 crashes on greylist.conf reload
2007-12-27 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... For an update, so far I haven t seen the problem again since the 4.0 upgrade from 4.0rc2. Of course I ll keep monitoring if it happens again,
Reporting Multiple Hits?
2007-12-26 by Dan Mahoney, System Admin
Hey all, I m looking for a way that I can report multiple hits from the same ip address, and cause them to be blacklisted/drop/reported to the appropriate
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.0rc2 crashes on greylist.conf reload
2007-12-26 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... Ok, I have just performed the upgrade on all mail servers. I have updated the greylist.conf file on the master node and will now monitor the
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.0rc2 crashes on greylist.conf reload
2007-12-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... First upgrade to 4.0. That won t take you much more time thanjust updating the binary and restarting, and that will keep us from loosing time on a bug that
milter-greylist 4.0rc2 crashes on greylist.conf reload
2007-12-24 by Michael Mansour
Hi, I ve been using this version of milter-greylist for some time (I know there s an upgrade but haven t had time to upgrade yet). Most recently I ve been
Re: [milter-greylist] configurable umask for greylist.db ?
2007-12-20 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Well, adding a mode after the dumpfile path does not seems overkill. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] configurable umask for greylist.db ?
2007-12-20 by Nerijus Baliunas
... Why is it too strict for you? ... If adding umask setting would be useful for a lot of people, why not, but if it is useful only for you (for example, you
configurable umask for greylist.db ?
2007-12-20 by Rob Kouwenberg
Howdy folks ! Whilst browsing through the code of milter-greylist it struck me that the umask of greylist.db isn t configurable. I could recompile the code,
Re: [milter-greylist] Questions regarding memory footprint
2007-12-17 by Benoit Branciard
... Some news: we used to compile our milter-greylist against libbind9. This was not needed, so last week I recompiled it without libbind, and restarted.
Re: [milter-greylist] Some features for future releases...
2007-12-15 by manu@netbsd.org
... It seems we have various tests we want to perform against a domain s MXes. Let s try to figure a configuration syntax general enough to avoid the thing
Re: [milter-greylist] Questions regarding memory footprint
2007-12-14 by manu@netbsd.org
... Sure, what about setting up a wiki? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] Questions regarding memory footprint
2007-12-14 by Benoit Branciard
... It would be great if some people running milter-greylist publish on this list the usual runtime values for their setups : number of entries in db, memory
Re: [milter-greylist] Questions regarding memory footprint
2007-12-14 by Michael Fromme
Hello, ... It could, I found some for our environment with an unknown origin outside the reach of milter-greylist or libmilter, deep down at thread creation or
Re: [milter-greylist] Some features for future releases...
2007-12-13 by Seth Mos
... You mean like the widely available and maintained bogons list? The one that lists the networks which are currently not assigned. It already exists. ... I
Re: [milter-greylist] Some features for future releases...
2007-12-13 by manu@netbsd.org
... Perhaps we could perform a lookup of the MX address against a DNSRBL, and build a DNSRBL of IANA-reserved block? It would make updates a bit easier. The
Re: [milter-greylist] Some features for future releases...
2007-12-13 by Seth Mos
... If we can verify the sender ip address is matching the MX record for the sending domain, then whitelist the message. It works better in practive when
feature wishlist (continued)
2007-12-13 by Benoit Branciard
I m probably dreaming, and there may be other ways to handle that over there, but why not... - implement IPv6 DNSBL as in
Re: [milter-greylist] Questions regarding memory footprint
2007-12-13 by Benoit Branciard
... Restart: 2GB - 100MB (still ~36000 entries) It was running for about one month. We are running a 2007/11/08 CVS snapshot (v4.0 plus SPF status report),
Re: [milter-greylist] Questions regarding memory footprint
2007-12-13 by Phil Randal
... 400,000 588MB I too suspect a leak, as ours grows over time and dramatically shrinks on a restart. Phil
Re: [milter-greylist] Questions regarding memory footprint
2007-12-13 by shuttlebox
On Dec 13, 2007 5:31 PM, Benoit Branciard ... My db holds almost 200.000 entries and uses around 600 MB. -- /peter
Re: [milter-greylist] Questions regarding memory footprint
2007-12-13 by Benoit Branciard
... Our milter-greylist currently eats up to 2GB. This is not a problem for now since our server has plenty of RAM (16GB), but since we compiled it in 32-bit,
Some features for future releases...
2007-12-13 by Benoit Branciard
here are some features I think would be nice to add one day in a release of milter-greylist: - sender MX validity : the idea is to able to identify sender
Re: [milter-greylist] Questions regarding memory footprint
2007-12-12 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, that should improve a lot the situation. Another trick would be to use the fact that the recipients are often the same for the same server. We could
Questions regarding memory footprint
2007-12-12 by Jim Carroll
We ve noticed that over time (and in our configuration), the memory consumption of milter-greylist has grown to over 400 MB per server instance. It would seem
Re: [milter-greylist] "milter-greylist" under Solaris SPARC
2007-12-06 by Chris Hoogendyk
... I recently upgraded from 1.6 to 4.0 after seeing the exchanges regarding Solaris fixes. Fingers crossed, I have had no instability problems so far -- about
Re: [milter-greylist] "milter-greylist" under Solaris SPARC
2007-12-06 by shuttlebox
... 4.0 is very stable for me. Lots of work was put in to making it stable though. Read more here too:
"milter-greylist" under Solaris SPARC
2007-12-06 by Matthias Scheler
Hello, is anybody using milter-greylist under Solaris SPARC? Does it work stable? Kind regards P.S. See
Re[2]: [milter-greylist] Can't get it working
2007-11-28 by Bust Ed
Hello Nerijus, There s no socket and *.db file. I ve created new empty, chowned to smmsp. No change: loaded config file /etc/mail/greylist.conf in 0.002246s
Re: [milter-greylist] Can't get it working
2007-11-27 by Nerijus Baliunas
... Please check permissions - is the user which runs milter-greylist able to access config, socket and *.db file? Regards, Nerijus
Re[2]: [milter-greylist] Can't get it working
2007-11-27 by Bust Ed
Hello Emmanuel, Thanks, Here what i ve got: su-2.05b# milter-greylist -Dv ... skipped Access list dump: racl 126 whitelist net_list my network racl 127
Re: [milter-greylist] Can't get it working
2007-11-27 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Yes, there are logs, they go to the mail facility. You can also start milter-greylist in the foreground and in verbose mode: milter-greylist -Dv --
Can't get it working
2007-11-27 by Bust Ed
Hi, I ve installed milter-greylist on my FreeBSD from ports. It worked, but there were some problems, so i decided to upgrade it. Downloaded from homepage
Re: [milter-greylist] how M-G handles messages with multiple recipients
2007-11-20 by Matt Kettler
... That makes really good sense, and it s even documented in the greylist.conf manpage: DATA-stage ACL cannot use the greylist cction, on the other hand, the
Re: [milter-greylist] how M-G handles messages with multiple recipients
2007-11-20 by manu@netbsd.org
... Moreover, if I recall correctly, we don t support greylisting in DATA-stage ACL (yet). -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] how M-G handles messages with multiple recipients
2007-11-20 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, that s what I meant :-) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] how M-G handles messages with multiple recipients
2007-11-20 by Matt Kettler
... you mean port 25, right ?
Re: [milter-greylist] how M-G handles messages with multiple recipients
2007-11-20 by Matt Kettler
... The same way any other multiple-recipient message is handled when one or more users is undeliverable, but others are. An example dialog between
Re: [milter-greylist] how M-G handles messages with multiple recipients
2007-11-20 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, it can (and does) do that. Just simulate an SMTP session by running telnet on port 35 of your SMTP server, and you ll see what happens exactly. --
Re: [milter-greylist] how M-G handles messages with multiple recipients
2007-11-20 by Chris Hoogendyk
... Please excuse my being annoying and ignorant, but how does it do that? Can it actually tell the sending mta that it is accepting some of the recipients and
Re: [milter-greylist] how M-G handles messages with multiple recipients
2007-11-20 by Matt Kettler
... At least for greylist actions in racl or acl (compatibility syntax for the same command) statements... anything done in a dacl is going to apply to all
Re: [milter-greylist] how M-G handles messages with multiple recipients
2007-11-20 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, it should work that way. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] how M-G handles messages with multiple recipients
2007-11-20 by Eduardo Casarero
Yes, in my server does that, also that happens when a recipient is auto-whitelisted and anothern isnt greylisting accepts and rejects the email depending on
how M-G handles messages with multiple recipients
2007-11-20 by Andrew Wilkinson
I ve got a number of users who wish to be exempt from grey-listing. I need to know what M-G does with messages that have multiple recipients, and one of the