On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 01:00:01PM -0500, Jason Bertoch wrote: > On Sunday, November 04, 2007 12:55 PM Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > > > > > How about http://www.libspf2.org/ <http://www.libspf2.org/> ? > > > > I've had bad experience with that library. If I recall correctly, it isn't the > next generation of libspf. Instead it's a knock-off and an unfortunate name > choice. Besides, after building, it can't pass it's own tests. Right, I encountered also some problems to get libsp2 working, too (depending on the actual platform). Some RPM provider offers SPEC files and patches, to get plain libspf2 to work (maybe you want give http://jk.kom.tuwien.ac.at/Software/milter-greylist/ a try for some information about this). However, it seems to exist an unwritten law considering the libspf2 testsuite as unusable and "don't touch". With the above mentioned patches libspf2 seems to be fairly stable, but I must confess, I don't have to many comparisions to other SPF implementations. Johann
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] libspf.org
2007-11-05 by Johann E. Klasek
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.