Yahoo Groups archive

Milter-greylist

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:32 UTC

Message

Re: [milter-greylist] DKIM vs domainkeys

2007-11-11 by Michael Mansour

Hi Emmanuel,

> Hello
> 
> A quick question for DKIM/DomainKeys users:
> 
> I'm looking at DKIM/DomainKeys. DKIM seems to be an evolution of
> DomainKeys. Is there a need for supporting both, or is there some
> backward compatibility that means DKIM support bring DomainKeys support?

The DKIM perl module I use has both DKIM and DomainKeys support.

Reading the SpamAssassin v310.pre file:

# DomainKeys - perform DomainKeys verification
#
# External modules required for use, see INSTALL for more information.
# Note that this may be redundant if you also plan to use the DKIM plugin.
#
#loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys

and the v312.pre file:

# DKIM - perform DKIM verification
#
# Mail::DKIM module required for use, see INSTALL for more information.
#
# Note that if C<Mail::DKIM> version 0.20 or later is installed, this
# renders the DomainKeys plugin redundant.
#
#loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM

and on my server, I use the spamassassin and perl-Mail-DKIM RPM's provided by
rpmforge:

spamassassin-3.2.3-1.el4.rf
perl-Mail-DKIM-0.26-1.el4.rf

So just enabling the DKIM pm in the SpamAssassin v312.pre file does the job
nicely for both DKIM and DomainKeys support.

Regards,

Michael.

> -- 
> Emmanuel Dreyfus
> http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
> manu@...
------- End of Original Message -------

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.