milter-greylist-2.0rc5 available
2005-06-10 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
milter-greylist 2.0rc4 had a fatal bug with acl domain clauses. Here is 2.0 rc5 that hopefully fixes that:
Messages
Browse messages
Page 117 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0rc4 available
2005-06-10 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Sometime a fix looks so simple you think there is no need for testing, this seems to turn always wrong... Let s roll 2.0rc5 (where I added your fix without
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0rc4 available
2005-06-10 by Martin Paul
... You made a mistake when integrating the domaincmp() patch - unlike emailcmp() it returns 1 (TRUE) on a match and 0 (FALSE) when not matching, so you have
Re: [milter-greylist] mx-syncing
2005-06-10 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, there is the problem of choosing the best source. Looking for latest entry sounds good. This can be done by another command to get the latest database
Re: [milter-greylist] mx-syncing
2005-06-09 by Fredrik Nyberg DC
... I m working on a prototype, I m using sync to dump the entire textfile with proper locking. However, I ll have to think about race-conditions a bit,
milter-greylist-2.0rc4 available
2005-06-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... Well, sure I should, but here it would not have saved me because I checked out 2.0rc3 instead of 2.0rc4 from CVS. Here is the real 2.0rc4 with its real MD5
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0rc4 available
2005-06-09 by Dan Hollis
... It was packaged incorrectly. # rpmbuild -ta milter-greylist-2.0rc4.tgz error: File /usr/src/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-2.0rc3.tgz: No such file or
milter-greylist-2.0rc4 available
2005-06-09 by manu@netbsd.org
Here is milter-greylist 2.0 release candidate 4: http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-2.0rc4.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-2.0rc4.tgz) =
Re: [milter-greylist] bug in "acl whitelist domain"
2005-06-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yep, I checked in your code. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Publicité subliminale: achetez ce livre!
Re: [milter-greylist] mx-syncing
2005-06-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... See in sync.c. The current commands are add, del, help, quit You can add two commands: dump greylist dump whitelist That would perform a text dump. The
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.0rc3 available
2005-06-09 by Cyril Guibourg
... Yes it makes sense. However, I ve checked again my logs and it turns that most of those MTAs I can see do resend queued messages. I would bet that the list
Re: [milter-greylist] bug in "acl whitelist domain"
2005-06-09 by Martin Paul
... I understand that, but .. ... .. as the odd substring matching behaviour was never documented like that, as no one seems to be interested in it, and as
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.0rc3 available
2005-06-09 by Martin Paul
... I allow yahoo mails via acl whitelist domain .yahoo.com for quite some time now, and couldn t see any ill effects (ie. spam from machines under
Re: [milter-greylist] mx-syncing
2005-06-09 by Fredrik Nyberg DC
... OK, I figured as much, just wanted to check that I don t start writing code that exists. I ll look into it. Cheers, Fredrik Nyberg
Re: [milter-greylist] mx-syncing
2005-06-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... There is never any real problem, just longer delivery. Note that if you have ten MX, the chance to retry on the machine that was down and does not have an
Re: [milter-greylist] mx-syncing
2005-06-08 by Fredrik Nyberg DC
... OK, this seems to work fairly well with two greylist-databases. If there were four or perhaps ten, then it would be a problem. But I assume there is no
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.0rc3 available
2005-06-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... It would probably make sense to have a DNS reverse whitelist of broken MTA to have this centralized. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD:
Re: [milter-greylist] Is milter-greylist safe in large environments?
2005-06-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... A milter-greylist option and you can get it for free in greylist.conf(5) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] mx-syncing
2005-06-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... You have missing entries on the host that was down, but that only cause extra delivery delays. Here is a sample scenario: 0) MX2 is down 1) senders sends
Re: [milter-greylist] bug in "acl whitelist domain"
2005-06-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... My goal was to preserve the historic (but odd) behaviour. You are probably right to do it that way. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Publicité subliminale: achetez ce
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.0rc3 available
2005-06-08 by fredrik.pettai@vattenfall.com
... Or maybe nmap-like: addr 216.155.201.59-70 /P
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.0rc3 available
2005-06-08 by Dan Hollis
... Maybe an option to describe a range? eg addr 216.155.201.59-216.155.201.70 -Dan
[SUMMARY] Re: [milter-greylist] Is milter-greylist safe in large environments?
2005-06-08 by Thomas Cameron
Looks like the answer is yes, it is safe. Many thanks to all who replied. I will let you know how it goes. Thomas
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.0rc3 available
2005-06-08 by Cyril Guibourg
... Hello, I recently discovered those new yahoogroups MTA: addr 216.155.201.59 #Yahoo groups addr 216.155.201.60 addr 216.155.201.61 addr 216.155.201.62
Re: [milter-greylist] Is milter-greylist safe in large environments?
2005-06-08 by Steven W. Orr
On Wednesday, Jun 8th 2005 at 10:54 -0400, quoth Dawn Keenan: = We re running milter-greylist 1.6 on a cluster of FC1/3 servers (dual = processor Dells, 1GB
Re: [milter-greylist] Is milter-greylist safe in large environments?
2005-06-08 by Dawn Keenan
... We re running milter-greylist 1.6 on a cluster of FC1/3 servers (dual processor Dells, 1GB memory) for a user community of about 40,000 and a greylist.db
mx-syncing
2005-06-08 by Fredrik Nyberg DC
Hello! I am looking at milter-greylist to replace our current greylistingsoftware, mainly due to the nice features that milter-greylist apparently has. I am,
Re: [milter-greylist] bug in "acl whitelist domain"
2005-06-08 by Martin Paul
... In the meantime I had produced a similar fix, also using a new domaincmp() function, but written from scratch. I ll attach the patch. I m running with my
Re: [milter-greylist] Is milter-greylist safe in large environments?
2005-06-08 by -ray
Thomas, I am running 1.6 for the university which has around 20,000 users. Machine is RHEL 2.1AS, quad processor, 4gig ram, doing around 100,000 messages a
Is milter-greylist safe in large environments?
2005-06-08 by Thomas Cameron
Howdy all - I want to implement milter-greylist in a relatively large environment (about 6000 e-mail users). I use milter-greylist on a bunch of smaller sites
Re: [milter-greylist] bug in "acl whitelist domain"
2005-06-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... I wrote a quick fix for that problem, but I have no time to test it. Can you give me your feedback? http://hcpnet.free.fr/milter-greylist/domaincmp.diff
Re: [milter-greylist] SPF and the milter-greylist ACLs.
2005-06-07 by Matt Kettler
... Yes, although my free time is limited so it may be a while before I get a chance. ... Agreed
Re: [milter-greylist] SPF and the milter-greylist ACLs.
2005-06-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... It would be a nice feature. Can you write the code for that? In order to avoid introducing new problems, it might be a good idea to check it in after 2.0
SPF and the milter-greylist ACLs.
2005-06-07 by Matt Kettler
Currently milter-greylist is able to perform checks of SPF and will whitelist messages that would be greylisted if SPF passes. However, I m in a slightly
Re: [milter-greylist] bug in "acl whitelist domain"
2005-06-07 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... (snip) ... Yes, someone already reported that, I need to find some time to fix it. Obviously we need a domaincmp function that does substring match. --
bug in "acl whitelist domain"
2005-06-07 by Martin Paul
Hi, I have switched from version 1.6 to 2.0rc3 on my production mail server, and noticed a serious misbehaviour in the handling of acl whitelist domain
Re: [milter-greylist] Problem with milter-greylist or sendmail on Linux
2005-06-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... Mail comming from sendmail s stdin. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Publicité subliminale: achetez ce livre!
Problem with milter-greylist or sendmail on Linux
2005-06-06 by Robert Stampfli
I m relatively new to milter-greylist, but so far am enjoying the effect it is having on spam mail. However, I have a problem that I cannot figure out: On my
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.0rc3 available
2005-06-06 by Martin Paul
Hi, I ve done some more polishing for the 2.0 release candidate, this time in greylist.conf. I ll attach the modified version. There are no functional
milter-greylist 2.0rc3 available
2005-06-05 by manu@netbsd.org
Hello Here is our 3rd release candidate for milter-greylist. http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-2.0rc3.tgz MD5
Re: [milter-greylist] Milter.macros.* (confMILTER_MACROS_*)
2005-06-01 by manu@netbsd.org
... Heh, that s the way I do it... -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Le cahier de l admin BSD 2eme ed. est dans toutes les bonnes librairies
Re: [milter-greylist] idea for poor man's SPF
2005-06-01 by Martin Paul
... I know, but I couldn t think of a better one. Hm, maybe domaincheck , or matchdomain , or just yao - for yet another option :) Choose any you like,
RE: [milter-greylist] idea for poor man's SPF
2005-06-01 by fredrik.pettai@vattenfall.com
... How about what you named it first, poormans-SPF =) But that name maybe sucks even more, since it isn t SPF... /P
Re: [milter-greylist] Milter.macros.* (confMILTER_MACROS_*)
2005-06-01 by Martin Paul
... Ok, I got it now. In fact there s already milter-greylist.m4, which does the correct thing - it adds just those macros to Milter.macros.* which are
Build error with 2.0rc2
2005-06-01 by techwolf_att_net
I me getting this error on CentOS release 3.4 (final) box. gcc -O2 -march=i686 -Wall -Iyes/include -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -c -o spf.o spf.c In
Re: [milter-greylist] idea for poor man's SPF
2005-05-31 by manu@netbsd.org
... Why phasing? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD: http://www.eyrolles.com/Informatique/Livre/9782212114638/livre-bsd.php manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] idea for poor man's SPF
2005-05-31 by hans hm04
... phasing
Re: [milter-greylist] idea for poor man's SPF
2005-05-31 by Matthias Scheler
... I know. ... That s the point. For whitelisting it is good enough to recognize some cases. Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler
Re: [milter-greylist] Milter.macros.* (confMILTER_MACROS_*)
2005-05-31 by manu@netbsd.org
... It s an exhaustive list for the situation where you use all the optional features (STARTTLS and friends). Of course depending on your setup, you might need
Re: [milter-greylist] idea for poor man's SPF
2005-05-31 by manu@netbsd.org
... The idea is good, but the name sucks :-) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Publicité subliminale: achetez ce livre!