Re: [milter-greylist] GL Problems
2005-05-31 by Martin Paul
... If nothing was delivered, check your mail log file (the one where syslog puts mail.* entries) and see what happened to them. Neither sendmail nor
Messages
Browse messages
Page 118 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] Milter.macros.* (confMILTER_MACROS_*)
2005-05-31 by Jack L. Stone
... {auth_author}, {mail_mailer}, {mail_host}, {mail_addr} ... My understanding is that any of those macro setting must include the settings needed to run the
GL Problems
2005-05-31 by MW Mike Weiner (5028)
Dear List Readers - I have run into a problem, possibly because of my noobiness with this milter, but i installed this on my mail servers over the weekend, and
Milter.macros.* (confMILTER_MACROS_*)
2005-05-31 by Martin Paul
Hi, The README says that to use milter-greylist one has to set these in sendmail.cf: O Milter.macros.connect=j,{if_addr} O Milter.macros.envfrom=i Is this
Re: [milter-greylist] idea for poor man's SPF
2005-05-31 by Martin Paul
... This would probably be even more efficient, but the MX record is for receiving mail, and it doesn t have to match the machine which actually sends mail for
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: idea for poor man's SPF
2005-05-31 by Martin Paul
... Those wouldn t be matched by the proposed function - I get a lot of those which are spam, too. user@domain.com from domain.com will be greylisted as usual,
Re: [milter-greylist] idea for poor man's SPF
2005-05-31 by Matthias Scheler
... I wouldn t tie that to the hostname but to the MX records: If you got an e-mail from user@domain.com from IP address 1.2.3.4 and at least one of the MX
Re: idea for poor man's SPF
2005-05-31 by Elrond
... *biggrin* That s one reason, why I don t ask for some features. I don t have the time to implement them. ... Not that I care particularly about the
Re: [milter-greylist] idea for poor man's SPF
2005-05-31 by Martin Paul
... I just knew I shouldn t have asked .. :) ... Maybe matchhostfrom , as it would basically check whether the sender host (its domain name really) matches
Re: [milter-greylist] idea for poor man's SPF
2005-05-30 by manu@netbsd.org
... You did, didn t you? :-) What will be the name of this option? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
idea for poor man's SPF
2005-05-30 by Martin Paul
Many greylist users want to reduce the number of valid messages being delayed by greylisting. I ve had a close look on spam and non-spam messages in the past,
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-29 by Matthias Scheler
... The default warn time of sendmail is 4 hours. If you shutdown your sendmail during the night a lot of remote systems will generated warning e-mails
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-28 by manu@netbsd.org
... I m not sarcastic, and it s just half a joke. If you stop sendmail, spam sent by spam engines is lost, and mail from real SMTP server will get queued and
RE: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-28 by Howard Picken
Or no.3 Steve s option which I like the best. Howard _____ From: milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com [mailto:milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven
RE: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-28 by Howard Picken
This all seems to going messy. John, having read what s come through on this thread, it seems that there two options available to you. 1. Stop sendmail from
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-28 by Steven Stern
... I think he s being sarcastic. Create two greylist.conf files, one for normal greylisting and one with acl whitelist default at the very top. Use a cron
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-28 by John Goggan
... Yes, but that is not at all the same result as running sendmail with the milter-greylist all night. In fact, I m not sure if you are making a joke with
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-28 by manu@netbsd.org
... Run sendmail without milter-greylist during the day, no mail will be delayed. Shut down sendmail at night, and you ll refuse all the mail coming from spam
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-28 by John Goggan
... I m confused what you mean by that. How would stopping sendmail at night produce the same result? - John...
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, that will work. You can even stop sendmail at night, that will produce the same result. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD:
Re: Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-27 by Elrond
Continuing the this might sound silly -theme: Why not use cron to rotate the greylist.conf and restart the milter? (will HUP be enough? I don t know).
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-27 by Steven W. Orr
On Friday, May 27th 2005 at 14:46 -0400, quoth John Goggan: = = Steven W. Orr wrote: = On Friday, May 27th 2005 at 15:49 -0000, quoth John Goggan: = =
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-27 by John Goggan
... This may be silly, but I suggested exactly that slightly further down in my message. Specifically, it read: ...as a temporary workaround method, it
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-27 by John Goggan
... Because I m finding them on a regular basis. These are not previously known senders. These are people that may be emailing our employees for the first
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-27 by Steven W. Orr
On Friday, May 27th 2005 at 15:49 -0000, quoth John Goggan: = Has anyone done anything with doing greylisting only during certain = times of the day? = This
Re: [milter-greylist] Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-27 by Eric J. Wisti
Why not just list the problem servers in /etc/mail/greylist.conf, like other ISP servers with similar issues? I do think that time based would have a useful
Time-based greylisting?
2005-05-27 by John Goggan
Has anyone done anything with doing greylisting only during certain times of the day? We really like the greylisting idea, but have come across too many poorly
Re: [milter-greylist] configuration options
2005-05-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... Can you send me a ptch for that? (make a jumbo patch that includes your previous usage() fixup proposal, that will be more convenient for me) ... Removing
configuration options
2005-05-25 by Martin Paul
Hi, I ve cross checked code, usage() and man pages for all options (command line and greylist.conf), and after these changes everything should be consistent:
Fixes for usage information
2005-05-25 by Martin Paul
Hi, I found some inconsistencies in the usage information and man page; no serious issues, just some polishing: - The -h option is missing both in usage() and
Re: [milter-greylist] install annoyance
2005-05-25 by Andreas Unterkircher
You can configure the user with the configure script ./configure --help .... --with-user=USERNAME The user that will run milter-greylist ....
install annoyance
2005-05-24 by Steven Stern
I build using ./configure --with-libspf=/usr/lib --with-conffile=/etc/mail/greylist.conf --with-db=/var/ On make install , the owner for /var/milter-greylist
milter-greylist 2.0 rc2
2005-05-24 by manu@netbsd.org
Here is milter-greylist 2.0rc2: http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-2.0rc2.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-2.0rc2.tgz) =
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: milter-greylist 2.0 rc1
2005-05-23 by Brian W. Antoine
... I was just installing it when I got your message. Nope, it core dumps someplace and kills the milter. I ve reverted back to an earlier version of that
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: milter-greylist 2.0 rc1
2005-05-23 by manu@netbsd.org
... So, is it alright? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD: http://www.eyrolles.com/Informatique/Livre/9782212114638/livre-bsd.php
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist as opt-in
2005-05-22 by Steven Stern
... I was misreading the log. acl whitelist default does produce the desired result. THANKS to all who helped. -- Steve
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist as opt-in
2005-05-22 by manu@netbsd.org
... Oh, yes, I see. acl whitelist default will work. acl whitelist rcpt default is an undocumented and unspecified config, and I have no idea of what ir
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Greylist as opt-in
2005-05-22 by Steven Stern
... I tried that and it seemed to whitelist everything. At least, a whole stream of IP addresses were shown as whitelisted with the -l flag. -- Steve
Re: Greylist as opt-in
2005-05-22 by Elrond
... I haven t yet tested this at all, but a quick glance at greylist.conf(5) shows this: Example 2: acl whitelist addr 193.54.0.0/16 domain friendly.com acl
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist as opt-in
2005-05-21 by Steven Stern
... It s like the whitelist is ignored: May 21 17:39:23 enoch milter-greylist: Access list dump: May 21 17:39:23 enoch milter-greylist: acl greylist rcpt
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist as opt-in
2005-05-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... The -l option should enable ACL debugging. What does it procudes? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD:
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist as opt-in
2005-05-21 by Steven Stern
... I wind up with everyone being greylisted when not using the -T, despite having acl whitelist rcpt default following the acl greylist rcpt entries. --
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: milter-greylist 2.0 rc1
2005-05-21 by Brian W. Antoine
... I believe I was a few more of them scattered around also. ... It will be Monday before I can install and test it, but looking over the patch, that should
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: milter-greylist 2.0 rc1
2005-05-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... Woops, yes, I did not noticed the debug printf there. ... Can you test that the following patch fixes everything?
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist as opt-in
2005-05-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, that s the default if you don t have an ACL entry for default. Having acl whitelist rcpt default at the end of the ACL is equivalent to using -T --
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist as opt-in
2005-05-21 by Steven Stern
... greylist.conf: # # Greylisting config file # # $Id: greylist.conf,v 1.24 2005/01/29 18:42:53 manu Exp $ # # Some of your users do not get any spam because
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist as opt-in
2005-05-21 by Steven Stern
... When I tried that without the -T option, it started greylisting all incoming mail. -- Steve
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: milter-greylist 2.0 rc1
2005-05-21 by Brian W. Antoine
... That would solve it also, though at the expense of copying the data around a couple of more times. Those printf s that are still in there are probably
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: milter-greylist 2.0 rc1
2005-05-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... My idea was to copy the string before touching it. Would it be alright? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Le cahier de l admin BSD 2eme ed. est dans toutes les bonnes
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist as opt-in
2005-05-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... -T is discouraged now, it s only there for backward compatibility. ... milter-greylist ACL work on a first-match win basis. So you want to write something