Re: Dead (link to Frank's Page)
2000-03-21 by Frank Vanaman
Hi Paul & everyone For those of you who actually tried to visit my page, sorry about the ServerSneeze. It should be up now. Every so often it needs a little
Messages
Browse messages
Page 606 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Multiples/Attenuator
2000-03-21 by Frank Vanaman
Hi everyone-- I ve stuffed up a sorta mediocre looking picture of my first attempt at a MOTM form factor panel. It s a quad attenuator with 2 four way
RE: [motm] VCO concept...
2000-03-21 by David Bivins
Don t forget using a self-oscillating 420 (and the forthcoming 440) as a sub-oscillator. The 420 tracks very well (though I haven t tried it over a wide
Re: [motm] VCO concept...
2000-03-21 by J. Larry Hendry
... You got it Ken. The 320 is one of my favorite modules. And, I would like to echo the comments concerning using the 320 in the audio range. It bakes a
RE: [motm] VCO concept.../also LFO
2000-03-20 by David Bivins
... I agree completely! I ve used it in audio range in a couple of tracks already. Also the pulse output makes a cool gate, synced via a trigger!
Encore Expressionist on eBay
2000-03-20 by ivancu@aol.com
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=285611912 Could be a deal considering these are fairly pricey new. Ivan
Re: [motm] Modules for Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-20 by Tony Allgood
... analysis/resynthesis using Walsh functions on Tony Allgood s site... Oh yes, that thing. Yes I really must dig it out again. I never managed to get the
RE: [motm] VCO concept...
2000-03-20 by Dave Bradley
... For those who joined the list after the big micro VCO discussion, attached is an image depicting where we ended up. Single space, relatively inexpensive,
RE: [motm] VCO concept...
2000-03-20 by Tkacs, Ken
Oh, okay-so the Triangle is fixed, but in essence the Sawtooth output is really doing what would be done if you skewed the Triangle anyway. ... From: Dave
RE: [motm] Modules for Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-20 by Dave Bradley
For something pretty hairy, check out an analog alternative to Fourier analysis/resynthesis using Walsh functions on Tony Allgood s site:
RE: [motm] Modules for Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-20 by Tkacs, Ken
You know, I have checked that out, but I m unfamiliar with Walsh Functions. I d love to know what it sounds like, and what it s like working with this machine.
Re: [motm] VCO concept...
2000-03-20 by hodad1@mindspring.com
... on ... My micromoog (& I m sure many other Moogs) has continously variable waveshape. Waveshape can also be set as a modulation destination. ... I am
RE: [motm] VCO concept...
2000-03-20 by Dave Bradley
It s already a feature on the 320 LFO, and something similair is in the works for the upcoming 310 micro VCO. Dave Bradley Principal Software Engineer
VCO concept...
2000-03-20 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
(BTW, Hi, this is still Paul Brousseau. Apparently my workplace decided unannounced that outgoing e-mail is going to be from our lucent accounts instead of
RE: [motm] VCO concept...
2000-03-20 by Tkacs, Ken
That often gets called a skew control. I ve often seen things like it on LFOs (i.e., the Korg MS Modulation Generators ), but to my knowledge not on an
Re: [motm] Raymond Scott [OT]
2000-03-20 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 03/20/2000 2:08:31 PM, mach25@inow.com writes:
Modules for Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-20 by Tkacs, Ken
Just daydreaming out loud... I was just thinking about how most synthesizer modifier modules function by changing the relative amplitudes of a sound s
Raymond Scott [OT]
2000-03-20 by Fred Becker
Raymond Scott was doing modular back in the 40 s-- http://RaymondScott.com More ideas for modules! (Check out the wild Circle Machine--ha!)
Re: [motm] Quantizer
2000-03-18 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-18 02:02:41 EST, you write: crow, maybe i`m too old and out
AGAIN:FS MOTM MODULES!´(last post)
2000-03-18 by Tunefish
hi motm-users, i need to sell my MOTM modules: MOTM-900 Powersupply, MOTM-800 ADSR MOTM-300 VCO MOTM-120 Suboctavemultiplexer
Re: [motm] Quantizer
2000-03-18 by The Old Crow
... Well, I wouldn t use linear PCM DACs as my first choice. :) I will have to look and see what the latest parts are that would 1) serve the purpose and 2)
Re: [motm] Osc Freedom
2000-03-18 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-16 16:48:19 EST, you write: dave, point taken on the counter / register
Re: [motm] Quantizer
2000-03-18 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-16 15:33:16 EST, you write:
Re: [motm] Osc Controller
2000-03-18 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-16 13:53:34 EST, you write:
Wacky Kovacy Cable Reminder
2000-03-17 by David Bivins
Hi all, I just received my latest batch of cables from John Kovac. I ordered four ea. of 1, 2, 3 and 4 foot cables--I asked him to mix up the colors as much as
Release Notice
2000-03-17 by Aaron Swihart
I am not sure if this is what Paul was talking about a week past, but here it goes. As far as I know this is the first national release of an album using MOTM
Re: [motm] Quantizer
2000-03-17 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... Quantizer: another idea that we ve beat the life out of here! When this first came up, maybe a year ago, there was a serendipity around Dave V.s suggestion
Re: [motm] Mixer
2000-03-17 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... This idea came about after a lengthy (heated) debate over the development of a MOTM mixer about a year ago -- the main problems being price/utility. If,
Re: [motm] Osc Controller
2000-03-16 by Nathan Hunsicker
Also, how do I search the onelist archives? every time i put in a search I get 27 or so messages from the last 2 months. -Nate
Re: [motm] Osc Controller
2000-03-16 by Nathan Hunsicker
So does this mean this module is already on the drawing board? -Nate (too late for the 1st discussion)
FW: [motm] Mixer - WAS: EMS Vocoder...
2000-03-16 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
(Appologies if this messages comes across twice. I sent it earlier this morning, but I haven t seen it show up in the list yet. And onelist is typically very
RE: [motm] Osc Controller
2000-03-16 by Dave Bradley
This is exactly what the module was supposed to do. Not surprising, since Paul proposed it after an identical earlier discussion about octave switching VCOs
RE: [motm] Osc Freedom
2000-03-16 by Dave Bradley
Keep in mind that EVERY analog sequencer has a digital controller in it! Whether it is based on a shift register or a counter, it s digital. The difference
Re: [motm] Quantizer
2000-03-16 by The Old Crow
... PICs aren t particularly powerful--they have very limited memory resources--but, they are *fast*. For dedicated apps, this speed is everything. For
RE: [motm] Osc Controller
2000-03-16 by Nathan Hunsicker
Back to Paul s Idea, how about a module that could produce 4 different adjustable fixed cv s? As long as the voltages are adjustable you could run the output
RE: [motm] Osc Controller
2000-03-16 by Tkacs, Ken
A simple one would, yeah. I would definitely want to at least scale the intervals, if not set them individually (which is apparently difficult for analog
RE: [motm] Osc Controller
2000-03-16 by Nathan Hunsicker
Am I understanding corectly that a quantizer would only allow cv voltages corresponding to the 12 tone scale? If so, wouldn t this make any type of portamento
Quantizer
2000-03-16 by Tkacs, Ken
BTW, another use for a quantizer is to get those bleepy-bloopy computer sounds, like what you get from noise into a sample & hold, but actually in tune, when
RE: [motm] Vocoder Wish List / Daydreams
2000-03-16 by Dave Bradley
Precisely! Dave
RE: [motm] Osc Controller
2000-03-16 by Dave Bradley
My thoughts on a dedicated octave switch type controller: I prefer a module that is generalized such that it can do several things. For this type of
RE: [motm] Vocoder Wish List / Daydreams
2000-03-16 by Tkacs, Ken
Right---Moog provided breakout points on the production filter banks so that she could get access to the individual bands. Sure, it was a real vocoder. What
RE: [motm] Vocoder Wish List / Daydreams
2000-03-16 by Nathan Hunsicker
... Thank god someone pointed that out to me, I feel like such a fool. All my life I have heard people refer to this piece of equipment as a vocoRder never
RE: [motm] Osc Freedom
2000-03-16 by Dan Higdon
As a single controller, having a module with one in, four outs, and four offset controls (plus maybe a couple of attenuating modulation inputs) to control a
RE: [motm] Osc Controller
2000-03-16 by Tkacs, Ken
Oh, I would *definitely* want a quantizer to be *defeatable!* But it s nice to have it there for when you need it. I m the first one to wave the flag for
RE: [motm] Mixer - WAS: EMS Vocoder...
2000-03-16 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
(Warning: This reply is made without reading all the new messages yet! Further, I am not yet coherent this morning! Observe caution!) It seems to me that
Re: [motm] Osc Freedom
2000-03-16 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-16 12:30:58 EST, you write:
Re: [motm] Vocoder plans?
2000-03-16 by thomas white
Here Here! I have been dying for a quality vocoder and am not willing or able to find and buy a classic. MOTM are the best analog tools/modules I ve ever
Re: [motm] Quantizer
2000-03-16 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-16 12:06:24 EST, you write:
Re: [motm] Osc Controller
2000-03-16 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-16 11:58:15 EST, you write:
Osc Freedom again
2000-03-16 by thomas white
Yeah Man, preach on my keyboard using brother!!! Some people on the list tought modular as being the most flexible with other controllers and this is true. But