RE: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-23 by Tkacs, Ken
That s how I was taught, too. I like the Zeroeth Harmonic name! ... From: jwbarlow@aol.com [mailto:jwbarlow@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, 22 March, 2000 9:48 PM
Messages
Browse messages
Page 604 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: [motm] Guitar synthm MOTM style?
2000-03-23 by Paul Schreiber
Yes, it generates both a CV (based on waveform amplitude of *all* the strings) and a GATE and a TRIG. ... From: thomas white
RE: [motm] Ladder Filter
2000-03-23 by Tkacs, Ken
Yeah, I love that kinda talk! ;) ... From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@airmail.net] Sent: Wednesday, 22 March, 2000 6:28 PM To: motm@onelist.com Subject:
Re: [motm] Are there any "new" sounds? [long]
2000-03-23 by james holloway
Paul, I tried to find Secrets of Synthesis to no avail. In my wanderings I found this site: http://www.wendycarlos.com//index.html On her page I found this
Re: [motm] Next filters
2000-03-23 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-23 00:24:05 EST, you write: paul, thanks for the info. any thoughts on non-commercial , unusual vcf`s ala
Re: [motm] Guitar synthm MOTM style?
2000-03-23 by Paul & Alleyne
... order, ... hello all, hello ignant (sorry:-) the basis for a guitar synth would be a pitch to voltage convertor- to convert the musical signal into a
Guitar synthm MOTM style?
2000-03-23 by thomas white
OK, call me ignant but what modules are necessary for the MOTM to be a guitar synth? I know the envelope follower will generate the gate but will it generate
Next filters
2000-03-23 by Paul Schreiber
There are 2 announced, the others are not :) [to keep you interested.] Next filter: Oberheim SEM state variable, with horrid op amps, crosstalk, CV
Re: [motm] Are there any "new" sounds? [long]
2000-03-23 by davevosh@aol.com
paul, an interesting view of one mans vision..... p.s. - 3 filters are out, what are the other 4 going to be / best, dave v.
Re: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-23 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-22 22:43:11 EST, you write:
Are there any "new" sounds? [long]
2000-03-23 by Paul Schreiber
I always like to delve into this area myself. Just a couple of ramblings: a) everyone should
Re: [motm] Mid 1970's EM Circuit Publication from Seattle
2000-03-23 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-22 22:42:26 EST, you write:
Re: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-23 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... Just the kind of comment I d expect, coming form the *zeroth* stooge!!! JB BTW, you did send that box out, didn t you? Otherwise I might have to rephrase
Re: [motm] Partially Mad
2000-03-23 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-22 16:17:18 EST, you write: ken, i`m not sure but if doable as an analog
Re: [motm] Partially Mad
2000-03-23 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-22 16:17:18 EST, you write:
Re: [motm] Partially Mad
2000-03-23 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-22 16:17:18 EST, you write:
Re: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-23 by J. Larry Hendry
... Looks like a kind of a stoogy answer to me. LH
Re: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-23 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... Or is the harmonic spectrum the *result* of the waveform? HA! Obviously, they are each a different perspective of the same phenomenon. But I agree entirely
Re: [motm] Mid 1970's EM Circuit Publication from Seattle
2000-03-23 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 3/22/2000 10:28:23 PM, davevosh@aol.com writes: A
Re: [motm] Mid 1970's EM Circuit Publication from Seattle
2000-03-23 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-22 15:14:26 EST, you write: paul, i remember that they started by doing pc boards for electronotes
Re: [motm] Mid 1970's EM Circuit Publication from Seattle
2000-03-23 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-22 15:06:16 EST, you write:
Re: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-23 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-22 12:50:30 EST, you write: ken, here, i have to pretty much agree with
Re: [motm] Ladder Filter
2000-03-23 by J. Larry Hendry
... In layman s terms that means the damn things are hard to design and make work correctly. Stooge Larry
Re: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-23 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... And I had heard it wrong! I looked it up in an old booklet from Scientific American called The Physics of Music which is a great little (110 pg.) booklet
Re: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-23 by jwbarlow@aol.com
In a message dated 3/22/2000 3:19:29 PM, oakley@techrepairs.freeserve.co.uk ... This is the way I ve always heard it as well (on the left coast of the US),
Re: [motm] Ladder Filter
2000-03-22 by Paul Schreiber
Well, the correct answer is that the poles of the complex conjugate pairs follow a polygon expansion along the root locus. Now, aren t you just thrilled with
RE: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-22 by Tkacs, Ken
Maybe that explains the confusion in terminology, why different sources insist on different uses for the terms. Thanks! ... From: Tony Allgood
Ladder Filter
2000-03-22 by Tkacs, Ken
Can someone explain in a few sentences what s different about a Ladder Filter? Besides the look of it in a schematic? I hear them mentioned and I ve seen
Re: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-22 by Tony Allgood
... the Fundamental is not a harmonic... Hi all, In the UK the fundamental is the first harmonic, the second harmonic is twice the fundamental and so on. We
Re: [motm] Mid 1970's EM Circuit Publication from Seattle
2000-03-22 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 3/22/2000 3:14:38 PM, synth1@airmail.net writes:
Partially Mad
2000-03-22 by Tkacs, Ken
Okay, here are some thoughts on modules that change harmonic spacing. For a modifier, what about something that basically does what a ring modulator does (but
Re: [motm] Mid 1970's EM Circuit Publication from Seattle
2000-03-22 by Paul Schreiber
This sounds like Wasatch Music Systems (gut named Peter Lutz). They offered pc boards of some Electronotes designs. I recall building a MC1495-based ring mod
Mid 1970's EM Circuit Publication from Seattle
2000-03-22 by ivancu@aol.com
I remember years ago ordering a publication that contained a number of different electronic music circuits; kind of a cookbook. It came from some place in
RE: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-22 by Tkacs, Ken
I will have to light some incense and mediate on this. I mean, without ever hearing a ring modulator, it would be a hard thing to dream up out of the blue.
RE: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-22 by Tkacs, Ken
I will have to light some incense and mediate on this. I mean, without ever hearing a ring modulator, it would be a hard thing to dream up out of the blue.
RE: [motm] Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-22 by Dave Bradley
... Let s take this from philosophical to straw man. Ken, since you have thought about this a lot, suppose you could design a module to do what you are asking.
RE: [motm] Modules for Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-22 by Dave Bradley
... True, the pots didn t go negative. However, the mixer was inverting so that you had your choice of the noninverted output from the dedicated output jack
Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-22 by Tkacs, Ken
Really? I find that very strange. I ve *always* approached synthesis with the harmonic spectrum in mind. The waveform is the *result* of the sound s harmonic
Re: [motm] Modules for pushing partials around
2000-03-22 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-21 13:02:13 EST, you write:
Re: [motm] Modules for pushing partials around
2000-03-22 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-21 12:47:53 EST, you write: steve, cool, yes........feasible........well.........maybe.
Re: [motm] Modules for Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-22 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-21 09:44:43 EST, you write:
Re: [motm] Modules for Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-22 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-21 09:34:36 EST, you write:
Re: [motm] Modules for Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-22 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-03-21 08:43:28 EST, you write:
Re: [motm] Speaking of Patents/Bernie
2000-03-22 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... Well, I got a lot flak for that one when I patented it, but who else are you gonna go to when you need a Digital Moose, eh? JB
Re: [motm] Modules for Pushing Partials Around
2000-03-22 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... ... ... Ken, I haven t heard partials used in this way for so long, I thought you were talking about partial differential equations for an
M-420 Prototype
2000-03-22 by Paul Schreiber
Added JH s hand-built perf board MOTM-420. Both front and back views. Mind-boggling thing. See: www.synthtech.com/demo Paul S.
RE: [motm] Museum of Prototypes
2000-03-22 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
--PBr
Re: [motm] Museum of Prototypes
2000-03-22 by Paul Schreiber
Err.....It s the special MOTM breadboard! Read your catalog!! Paul S. ... From: Brousseau, Paul E (Paul) To: Sent:
RE: [motm] Museum of Prototypes
2000-03-22 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
COOL!! You ve probably already sent this one to the archive, but what model prototyping board is that? In the deeper recesses of my brain I have an urge to
Re: [motm] Raymond Scott [OT]
2000-03-22 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 3/21/2000 9:29:16 PM, Aardvark1@aol.com writes: