Re: [milter-greylist] Install trouble
2007-02-13 by Harish Pillay
Arjun - Please check if you have SElinux turned on. Check in the /var/log/messages file for avc messages. I suspect that SELinux is not told that you are
Messages
Browse messages
Page 80 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by Nerijus Baliunas
... You can, but probably better is to do either of these: rebuild rpm with user smmsp and not root change user to smmsp in /etc/rc.d/init.d/milter-greylist
milter-greylist 3.1.5 is available
2007-02-12 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Here is our latest developement snapshot. As on e can see in the Changelog, things keep moving a lot: Fix double free when using content filtering ACL clauses
Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by arjun_datta
... I changed the user smmsp in /etc/mail/greylist.conf to user root and now it runs on a valid socket! [root@mail Desktop]# ps auwx | grep milter-greylist
Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by arjun_datta
... Ah I see what you mean - sorry for not getting you first time around: in /etc/mail/greylist.conf user smmsp in /etc/rc.d/init.d/milter-greylist user=root
Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by arjun_datta
... Thankyou for your suggestions - I tried them below: [root@mail Desktop]# service milter-greylist stop Stopping Milter-Greylist:
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by Nerijus Baliunas
... Regards, Nerijus
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by Nerijus Baliunas
... I mean configured to run. in /etc/mail/greylist.conf what is user ... ? in /etc/rc.d/init.d/milter-greylist what is user= ... ? ls -ld
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by vn
Yep, that s why I created it... in /var/milter-greylist/milter- greylist.sock by doing this : touch /var/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock what about a
RE: [milter-greylist] Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by Arjun Datta
See, that s the thing I cannot find milter-greylist.sock anywhere. I looked in /var/milter-greylist - not there I looked in /var/run - - not there
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by vn
I remember having this problem.. I think I solved it by touch milter-greylist.sock. Any luck for you? Regards Vincent
Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by arjun_datta
... [root@mail init.d]# ps auwx | grep milter-greylist root 19412 0.0 0.0 3912 672 pts/8 R+ 15:44 0:00 grep milter-greylist Doesn t seem to be
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by vn
What about ps aux | grep milter-greylist ?
Re: Install trouble
2007-02-12 by arjun_datta
... file. ... Hi Nerijus, I can t even tell if it is running: [root@mail init.d]# service milter-greylist stop Stopping Milter-Greylist:
Re: [milter-greylist] Install trouble
2007-02-12 by Nerijus Baliunas
... What user milter-greylist runs as? Does it have write permissions in /var/milter-greylist? Regards, Nerijus
Re: [milter-greylist] Install trouble
2007-02-12 by eclark
Sounds like the lockfile is dead. Check for it and restart the milter.
Install trouble
2007-02-12 by Arjun Datta
Greetings all, I have a FC 5 machine running sendmail 8.13. I obtained the milter-greylist-3.0.tgz from the website and built it into an rpm as outlined by
Re: [milter-greylist] Sendmail 8.14.0
2007-02-12 by Stefan Gatterbauer
yes - no problems so far Once upon a time (Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:03:39 -0000), Tom Hedges ... This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Re: [milter-greylist] Sendmail 8.14.0
2007-02-12 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... I do. ... Describe seems ? -- Mart
Re: Two Suggestions
2007-02-12 by Tom Hedges
... I d like to pursue this a little more. From what you and another has posted a reasonable implementation would be as follows: An optional global (non-acl)
Re: [milter-greylist] Sendmail 8.14.0
2007-02-12 by Harish Pillay
... I have been. ... Haven t seen any issue thus far. In fact I was testing it out with the betas before .14.0 came out. Harish
Sendmail 8.14.0
2007-02-12 by Tom Hedges
Anyone using this? It has new milter callbacks, but seems buggy. Probably 8.14.1 (or later) may worth supporting
default greylist.conf acl question
2007-02-11 by George Elgin
specifically this line acl whitelist list my network is this statement white listing both to/from ? it appears to me is does (when i upgraded to 3.1.4)
p0f
2007-02-11 by BERTRAND Joël
Hello, I have discovered p0f ? Is it possible to use this program to write greylisting rules ? Regards, JKB
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist migration from Sendmail to Postfix
2007-02-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... When searching the database for a tuple. Of course when we find the tuple, we stop searching and the following expired tuples are not flushed. But we ll
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist migration from Sendmail to Postfix
2007-02-07 by vn
Yeah but when does it sees them? ... --
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist migration from Sendmail to Postfix
2007-02-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... That should work like that. The only pitfall I can think of is to run configure with a different --with-user. I try to maintain a full backward
milter-greylist migration from Sendmail to Postfix
2007-02-07 by vn
Hi, I know the next milter-greylist release will include Postfix support. I actually have a production server that runs milter-greylist on Sendmail without
Re: {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] --with-user
2007-02-07 by Nerijus Baliunas
... Please send a diff here (i.e. diff -u rc-suse.sh.in.orig rc-suse.sh.in rc-suse.sh.in.diff). Regards, Nerijus
Re: {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] --with-user
2007-02-07 by Nerijus Baliunas
... Yes, this fixed it, thanks. Regards, Nerijus
Re: {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] --with-user
2007-02-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... I made a broader fix today: milter-greylist does not try to change uid/gid if not started as root. That should fix the issue. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] --with-user
2007-02-06 by Kai Schaetzl
... I think the reason for this is that the command line in rc-redhat.sh actually tries to hand the user to the daemon command and not to milter-greylist:
Re: [milter-greylist] --with-user
2007-02-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... then /etc/rc.d/milter-greylist start does not start with an error in the log: milter-greylist: /usr/bin/milter-greylist: cannot change supplementary
--with-user
2007-02-06 by Nerijus Baliunas
Hello, As you can now use rpmbuild --define build_user smmsp -tb milter-greylist-3.1.5a1.tgz, there s probably no need for configure to alter line %define
Re: [milter-greylist] group permissions for socket
2007-02-06 by Nerijus Baliunas
... Yes, it does, thanks, Nerijus
RFC: tuple override
2007-02-06 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Hi I plan to add a tuple override feature: it will be possible to set the tuple that will be greylisted and autowhitelisted from an ACL, overriding
Re: [milter-greylist] group permissions for socket
2007-02-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... I had to refactor it a bit. Please check it works as expected. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] group permissions for socket
2007-02-05 by Nerijus Baliunas
... Thanks, it s clear now :). Patch attached. Regards, Nerijus
Re: [milter-greylist] group permissions for socket
2007-02-05 by manu@netbsd.org
... Hint: socket: SOCKET QSTRING { ... } ... ... switch($2) { case 666: case 660: case 600: default: /* error */ } } ; -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: [milter-greylist] group permissions for socket
2007-02-04 by Nerijus Baliunas
... How do I deal with config file parsing? I tried the following: diff -u -r1.45 conf.c ... +++ conf.c 4 Feb 2007 23:06:01 -0000 @@ -425,6 +425,7 @@
Re: [milter-greylist] group permissions for socket
2007-02-04 by manu@netbsd.org
... Ok, so let s add an additionnal argument for the mode socket /var/run/milter-greylist.sock 660 Possible values: 666, 660 or 600, which turn into umask
Re: [milter-greylist] group permissions for socket
2007-02-04 by Nerijus Baliunas
... According to http://www.milter.org/milter_api/smfi_setconn.html , using umask it the official way: The permissions for a unix/local domain socket are
Re: [milter-greylist] group permissions for socket
2007-02-04 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, it seems to be created from smfi_main() ... Sure: this is never reached in normal condition. ... I have two concerns: - can we screw things in
Re: [milter-greylist] group permissions for socket
2007-02-04 by Nerijus Baliunas
... I am trying the following patch: diff -u -r1.162 milter-greylist.c ... +++ milter-greylist.c 3 Feb 2007 23:48:24 -0000 @@ -1276,6 +1276,10 @@
Re: {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] Two Suggestions
2007-02-02 by Tom Hedges
... I find only 1% to 2% of greylist and whitelist entries match these criteria, thus subjecting the other 98% to it is a major algorithm change; although I
Re: {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] Two Suggestions
2007-02-01 by Kai Schaetzl
... If the idea behind this is to reduce the database size why not go to 2-tuple saving only if lazyaw is set? Someone who wants to use this
Re: {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] Two Suggestions
2007-02-01 by Kai Schaetzl
... I think you can t find out the merits if you don t implement it. Off by default. And identify it in logging, so one can actually see when it happens. Kai
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Two Suggestions
2007-02-01 by manu@netbsd.org
... I m not really hostile, but I d like comments from other users. Any input, anyone? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: Two Suggestions
2007-02-01 by Tom Hedges
... You are correct, in addition the maximum number of user smmsp child processes may be limited as well as maximum number of vfork ed child processes per
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Two Suggestions
2007-02-01 by Michael Menge
... There is an option define(`confREFUSE_LA , `18 )dnl in the mc config sendmail which will reject Mails if the load is higher than 18 ... M.Menge