Milter-greylist

On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 08:29:43 +0100 manu@... wrote:

> >  It seems the best
> > option would be to use umask(), but then it's impossible to use syntax like
> > socket "/foo/bar/sock" 660, isn't it?
> 
> I have two concerns:
> - can we screw things in smfi_main() by tempering with umask()?
> - doesn't smfi_main() set umask() to avoid such problems?

According to http://www.milter.org/milter_api/smfi_setconn.html ,
using umask it the official way:

The permissions for a unix/local domain socket are determined as usual
by umask, which should be set to 007 or 077.

Regards,
Nerijus