Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.7.5 released
2005-01-31 by Cyril Guibourg
... No blame at all. Any feedback is always positive. ... It is. I ll do my best in order to send milter-greylist-devel PR soon. Regards.
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 125 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
2005-01-31 by Cyril Guibourg
... No blame at all. Any feedback is always positive. ... It is. I ll do my best in order to send milter-greylist-devel PR soon. Regards.
2005-01-31 by Jack L. Stone
... Indeed, the blame is all mine, because that little inner voice reminds me that it might be risky to try that using an older port, although it works most
2005-01-31 by Steven Stern
Using ... # milter-greylist -r milter-greylist-1.7.5 sdstern@ciscy.sterndata.com:/root/download/milter-greylist-1.7.5 Sat Jan 29 18:37:05 CST 2005 run as
2005-01-31 by Cyril Guibourg
Salut Emmanuel, ... Until now (i.e port version 1.6): I was conducted to patch milter-greylist.c and the Makefile in order to get milter-greylist to compile
2005-01-31 by Cyril Guibourg
... The port is providing support for stable versions of milter-greylist. There is no reason to assume that a patch to be applied to 1.6 will work on later
2005-01-30 by Jack L. Stone
... needs ... You don t see it because the port needs you to revise it for the version and checksum. My revision of it worked for 1.7.4... but, not 1.7.5 Happy
2005-01-30 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu Not my fault: The FreeBSD package needs to be updated. Why does it needs manu local patches, anyway? I don t see a port for 1.7.X. I believe
2005-01-30 by Jack L. Stone
... Wasn t assigning blame -- in fact, figured I did something wrong, even though the port approach is largely idiot-proof as long as it is up to date. As I
2005-01-30 by Ivan F. Martinez
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:01:21 +0100 manu@netbsd.org wrote: MO MO Hi MO MO I managed to find some time to blend the pending patch for delayed MO rejection
2005-01-30 by manu@netbsd.org
... Not my fault: The FreeBSD package needs to be updated. Why does it needs local patches, anyway? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
2005-01-30 by Jack L. Stone
... OS - 4.10-RELEASE-p2 Emmanuel: I have been using v-1.7.4 ever since it was released and seemed to work okay. So, I jumped on the chance to update to this
2005-01-29 by manu@netbsd.org
Hi I managed to find some time to blend the pending patch for delayed rejection (but I did not tested it, so blame the contributor if it breaks), and here is
2005-01-28 by H Li
... Thank you very much! Harvey __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com
2005-01-28 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... It says 451 4.7.1 Greylisting in action, please come back in 00:05:00 But the sender SMTP server only understands the codes: 451 4.7.1 451 means Requested
2005-01-28 by H Li
... As I said in my previous mail that there is no way to know in advance WHICH servers may have problem until my users have lost many mails and report to me.
2005-01-28 by Christian Pelissier
... Not all, only those with greylisting problems. ... It s not a new email address; it s a feature of sendmail. All of your users can receive email with
2005-01-28 by H Li
... Could you explain what information the greylist will send to the sender s server before my server accepts the message? Something like server temporarily
2005-01-28 by H Li
... Could you explain more in detail? If my server is aaa.bbb.ccc (i.e. my user s email address is uuu@aaa.bbb.ccc), and I select a secret sss, then I should
2005-01-28 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Non resending hosts violate the SMTP standard. They already loose mail on a random basis without greylisting: if a server is too busy, it will refuse new
2005-01-28 by Christian Pelissier
Here is the trick (because sendmail remove +xxxxx in email address) whitelist the rcpt rcpt /.*+FAST@yoursite.com/ and ask your users to add +FAST to email
2005-01-28 by hvli
... this ... Then, I have a question. I have many users who regularly receive mails from many countries. I have no idea if those servers repeat or not repeat
2005-01-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... I don t know. I m happy without it. ... The dump file is a... dump file! It s only re-readen by milter-greylist at startup time. If you want to modify it
2005-01-27 by H Li
Hi, I just installed milter-greylist-1.6, and it is running. Two questions: 1. Is it good to use -L 24 option? I notice that if it is used, many emails will
2005-01-27 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Yes: the sender decides when it resends. ... That does not sounds that bad. ... Look into the tarball. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2005-01-27 by H Li
Hi, Thanks for several people s help, after installing sendmail-devel, I successfully installed milter-greylist-1.6. Then, following the instruction in
2005-01-27 by Thomas Cameron
... From: H Li To: Greylist Milter Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 3:13 PM Subject: [milter-greylist]
2005-01-26 by Dawn Keenan
... You re probably missing the sendmail-devel RPM, which you need to build programs that use the sendmail include files and/or libraries. --d
2005-01-26 by H Li
Hi, I just download milter-greylist-1.6, and try to install it on my redhat fc3 linux system (using sendmail 8.13.1-2). When I run ./configure, I got:
2005-01-26 by Matthias Scheler
... You can ignore these errors safely. They just mean that milter-greylist couldn t parse a few lines with invalid e-mail address and therefore didn t
2005-01-26 by fredrik.pettai@vattenfall.com
I had that problem too just yesterday, infact :-) If you had looked in the greylist.db at the line you get the complains about, you would probably find some
2005-01-26 by Steven Stern
These errors popped up my maillog after a reboot this morning: Jan 26 07:29:52 ciscy milter-greylist: unknown token [ line 387, skipping Jan 26 07:29:52
2005-01-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... This should work. I use it at mine. Does it match andyb, randyb, both or none? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2005-01-25 by Kevin Mitchell
Hiya, We ve been testing the milter-greylist for a while now and found it to be excellent. However we noticed that when we do something like this: acl
2005-01-25 by Steven Stern
... What s in your maillog file? Here s a snippet of mine: Jan 23 04:03:42 ciscy milter-greylist: j0NA3fMc027457: addr 209.132.177.30 from
2005-01-24 by Scot L. Harris
... When I originally tested milter-greylist I blacklisted a bogus senders address then used telnet to send using that as the sender. I also black listed the
2005-01-24 by manu@netbsd.org
... If you do that from a whitelisted IP, there is nothing surprising. If milter-greylist is running, it will add a X-Greylist header to each mail that passes
2005-01-24 by Farhan S.
... greylist-milter. ... hei bill, i couldn t see your configuration file. the file is not stored in the mailing list. i am using yahoo groups interface.
2005-01-24 by William F. Dudley Jr.
I m just using a modified version of the one that came with greylist-milter. Bill Dudley
2005-01-24 by Farhan S.
... software. I ... you having ... hei steve, thanks for your reply.. well, i enable milter-greylist on my sendmail but it doesn t seem to block anything. i
2005-01-24 by Steven W. Orr
On Monday, Jan 24th 2005 at 12:31 -0000, quoth Farhan S.: = = = would anybody be kind enough to share his/her greylist.conf? better if = it is from a
2005-01-24 by Steven Stern
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:31:15 -0000, Farhan S. ... I made almost no changes to the .conf file that came with the software. I added a
2005-01-24 by Farhan S.
would anybody be kind enough to share his/her greylist.conf? better if it is from a production server. i have searched around the net, but couldn t find any. i
2005-01-22 by manu@netbsd.org
... Whitelist them. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2005-01-22 by roxpace_
... of ... Thanks for the quick reply. Unfortunately it s the entire message including headers which you could see and this was from one of the biggest email
2005-01-22 by manu@netbsd.org
... Perhaps the sending MTA does not retry at all. What is in the body of the delivery status notification? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
2005-01-22 by roxpace_
Hi, Now I got a new problem, there seems to be some servers that doesn t retry to send again after the first denial/delay. Here is my servers log: Jan 21
2005-01-20 by roxpace_
Thanks for the configuration tip, any other like that is very welcome :) But still I would appreciate if anyone could tell me how to debug emails coming in to
2005-01-20 by eugene_kurmanin
Some stupid servers don t correctly reacted on the temporary error after RCPT. Some do permanent error, some return temporary error message to user, but don t
2005-01-20 by manu@netbsd.org
... Please post the headers of a mail that had problems. It s difficult to say what went wrong without looking at this. ... You can whitelist in the config
2005-01-20 by roxpace_
I has setuped milter-greylist on my server and it works like a charm except for some users, they are complaining that they can t send emails to our server,