Milter-greylist

At 10:09 AM 1.31.2005 +0100, Cyril Guibourg wrote:
>
>"Jack L. Stone" <jacks@...> writes:
>
>> Wasn't assigning blame -- in fact, figured I did something wrong, even
>> though the port approach is largely idiot-proof as long as it is up to
>> date. As I said, it worked with 1.7.4. I believe the port maintainer is/was
>> on this list and would have to answer your question.
>
>The port is providing support for stable versions of milter-greylist. There
>is no reason to assume that a patch to be applied to 1.6 will work on later
>versions. If it was the case with 1.7.4, then you were lucky.
>
>I have a devel version of the port in my TODO list which would bring 1.7.5
>to you. Because of several hard constraints I wasn't able to get it
>rolled-out. It is still wip.
>
>Regards.
>
>

Indeed, the blame is all mine, because that little inner voice reminds me
that it might be risky to try that using an "older" port, although it works
most of the time. I do it because sometimes the other way doesn't work
either because of something do do with FBSD.

Just thought I would share the experience from one of the dumb users.
Sometimes it might be helpful.


Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone

System Admin
Sage-american