Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 120 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
2005-05-03 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... It s just message comming from sendmail s stdin, so there is no source IP. You get the error message because you requested it: it s debug level. You can
2005-05-03 by fredrik.pettai@vattenfall.com
Hello list! I get messages like this in my sendmail logs. I m woundering if someone else have the same problem. May 3 14:15:36 sm-mta milter-greylist: [ID
2005-04-30 by Elrond
Hi, What do people recommend? Use the shipped m4 file as a HACK or as a FEATURE? The latter doesn t sound so q&d. Elrond
2005-04-21 by -ray
... Or set the MILTER_LOG_LEVEL to a lower number. It s 9 by default. Set this in your mc file and it should get rid of most milter loggin. Not sure what
2005-04-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... Remove it from the source and rebuild... :-) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2005-04-21 by Matt Kettler
... Regular expressions should be case insensitive, unless you re using a version older than 1.3.6. Is there any chance you re starting milter-greylist with -T
2005-04-21 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... This is fixed in the latest 2.0 beta -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2005-04-21 by Thomas Cameron
I added this to greylist.conf: from /.*@usaa .com/ I restarted milter-greylist to be sure. Then I noticed these in my maillog: Apr 21 10:13:34 wintermute
2005-04-21 by Thomas Cameron
Howdy - I am running 1.6. My daily logwatch e-mail is filled with thousands of these entries: Milter add: header: X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient
2005-04-21 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... It does if you do use it. Not everyone uses milter-greylist.m4 to generate sendmail.cf -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2005-04-21 by Elrond
Shouldn t all that be handled by milter-greylist.m4? Elrond
2005-04-21 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... You are right: there is no need to alter the config if you already have them. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2005-04-21 by fredrik.pettai@vattenfall.com
Hello! The reason for my question is that i use some other milter-plugins which are depending on the other values supplied by some of the default milter-marcos
2005-04-20 by Martin Paul
... As far as I m concerned, it can wait. Man pages working under Solaris definitely would be a good thing, too. mp.
2005-04-19 by manu@netbsd.org
... The patch sounds fine to me. I ll integrate it if nobody complains. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2005-04-19 by Elrond
Hi, I noticed, that the shipped Makefile loves installing to $prefix/bin instead of prefix/sbin. Talking to Emmanuel Dreyfus it seems he wants to keep this for
2005-04-19 by manu@netbsd.org
... I committed it and it will be available in 2.0 beta6. Should I roll it now, or should I wait for man pages working on Solaris? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Le
2005-04-19 by Martin Paul
... I have been running the modified version of milter-greylist for one week now. No ill side-effects showed up during that time, and I had one message (where
2005-04-12 by manu@netbsd.org
... No problem, we ll wait one week. Thank you for taking care of that issue. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2005-04-12 by Martin Paul
... Ok, I have recompiled milter-greylist 1.6 with the following change to pending.c now: 305c305,311
2005-04-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... You had the issue in the past, so there are some chances you have it again in the future. ... Sure it does. That s why it would be good to test that the
2005-04-11 by mpaul888
... Hardly possible, as I would need a test message that s re-sent after exactly one minute to have rest == 0. You know the code better than me, does my
2005-04-11 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Give it a try and let us know... -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2005-04-11 by Martin Paul
... Yes, it s signed on my system, so that shouldn t be a problem. I guess that would result in more severe problems anyway (no messages accepted at all, as
2005-04-08 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Yes, you are right, I spoke too fast: that s a wrong test. That will work better: int main(void) { time_t x = -1; if (x
2005-04-08 by Matt Kettler
... Emmanuel.. Are you sure that s going to tell you anything useful? The difference between signed and unsigned is in how the values are interpreted. You can
2005-04-08 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... That means that in pending.c:pending_check(), we don t match the if (rest
2005-04-08 by Martin Paul
Hi, I m using milter-greylist 1.6 with sendmail 8.13.2 under Solaris 9 for about 3 weeks now. I m following log files closely, and for thousands of messages it
2005-04-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... Isn t this what we currently do? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD:
2005-04-06 by Jacob Garder
... Thats true...so maybe the lazyaw option should greylist on the (IP-address, reciever, sender) tuple, but whitelist only IP-adresses? /jacob
2005-04-05 by Matthias Scheler
... A Zombie spam PC which sends an e-mail to joe@your-domain.com and a few minutes later a e-mail to tom@your-domain.com and gets whitelisted that way.
2005-04-05 by manu@netbsd.org
... Think about networks running behind NAT with regular SMTP server and zombies running spam engines. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD:
2005-04-05 by Jacob Garder
Hi! Does someone have experience or statistics of running greylist with the lazyaw option? Does it decrease the efficiency significantly? As far as I can see
2005-04-04 by H Li
... That makes sense in logic. If so, it means that those spams escaped from greylist filter at the first place, then spamassassin caught it, created a new
2005-04-04 by Matthias Scheler
... SpamAssassin created a new e-mail which contains the original one as attachment. That s probably why your X-Greylist headers vanish. Kind regards --
2005-04-04 by H Li
... Sorry for a typo above: It should be: The system log does not show anything about almost-spam and probably-spam emails, but only for normal emails: delayed
2005-04-04 by H Li
... I have clamd and spammassassind running as daemons. Then, the /etc/procmailrc has: ... * ^X-Virus-Status: Yes /opt/virusfiles # if not, let it go through
2005-04-04 by Brian W. Antoine
... That s configurable and always adding the header is supposed to be the default.
2005-04-04 by -ray
... I ve seen this also. If an entry is already whitelisted, then milter-greylist does not add any headers. Can anyone confirm? It d be nice if it at least
2005-04-04 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... You mean you start them through procmail? If this what you do, then all mails are first seen by milter-greylist, then by your procmail machinery. I don t
2005-04-04 by H Li
Hi, After I install and run milter-greylist in our fc3 linux email server, the number of spam emails reduced significantly. I greatly appreciate this
2005-03-31 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Here is milter-greylist 2.0 beta5, which fixes a MX sync problem on Solaris that was supposed to be fixed in beta4 but was not.
2005-03-29 by manu@netbsd.org
... Ooops, that was not meant to go public. Forget about it, everyone! :-) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD:
2005-03-29 by manu@netbsd.org
... Please check that this beta5 works as intended, and I ll make an announce for it afterwards. MD5 (milter-greylist-2.0b5.tgz) =
2005-03-29 by manu@netbsd.org
... It s the whildcard entry that match messages that did not match any other rule. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2005-03-29 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... No problem, let s roll out a beta5 -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2005-03-29 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Youhave to upgrade to 2.0 beta4 before: ACL are not available in 1.6.x -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2005-03-29 by ranko_z
Emanuel, ... When you said that you have commited the changes, I thought that you have also submitted the part that relates to the swap of the checks for
2005-03-29 by H Li
... Thanks! A question about your entries: why do we need the last line acl whitelist default but no line like this: acl greylist default What does default
2005-03-29 by H Li
... Thank you very much! Before I upgrade to v2 beta, I will try what you adviced. Harvey __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small