Re: [milter-greylist] config at user level?
2005-03-29 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Upgrade to 2.0beta4 and enjoy the power of ACL configuration that was contributed by Remy Card. You can write tricky configs like this: acl whitelist rcpt
Messages
Browse messages
Page 121 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
config at user level?
2005-03-29 by H Li
Hi, I am using v1.6 in fc3 linux. It is working normally. My question is: is there any way to config the greylist at user s level, even partially? Some users
milter-greylist 2.0beta4 released
2005-03-29 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Enjoy: http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-2.0b4.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-2.0b4.tgz) = a89b89a5dfd1a229ecde163c4c0e597c Only one change
Re: [milter-greylist] configure.ac _REENTRANT issue (was: sync.c:local_addr() use)
2005-03-28 by manu@netbsd.org
... Thanks, I committed it. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] configure.ac _REENTRANT issue (was: sync.c:local_addr() use)
2005-03-27 by Ranko Zivojnovic
... Yes. I applied it and it fixes the HAVE_GET{ADDR,NAME}INFO issue just fine. ... checking for getaddrinfo... yes checking for getnameinfo... yes checking if
Re: [milter-greylist] configure.ac _REENTRANT issue (was: sync.c:local_addr() use)
2005-03-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... Ranko, can you confirm that Hajimu s patch fixes everything at yours? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] configure.ac _REENTRANT issue (was: sync.c:local_addr() use)
2005-03-27 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... ranko If you execute configure as it was you will notice in config.log that ranko HAVE_GETADDRINFO and HAVE_GETNAMEINFO do get declared twice in
Re: [milter-greylist] configure.ac _REENTRANT issue (was: sync.c:local_addr() use)
2005-03-27 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... ranko If you execute configure as it was you will notice in config.log that ranko HAVE_GETADDRINFO and HAVE_GETNAMEINFO do get declared twice in
Re: [milter-greylist] configure.ac _REENTRANT issue (was: sync.c:local_addr() use)
2005-03-26 by Ranko Zivojnovic
... If you execute configure as it was you will notice in config.log that HAVE_GETADDRINFO and HAVE_GETNAMEINFO do get declared twice in confdefs.h as follows:
Re: [milter-greylist] configure.ac _REENTRANT issue (was: sync.c:local_addr() use)
2005-03-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... What does this change do? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
configure.ac _REENTRANT issue (was: sync.c:local_addr() use)
2005-03-26 by ranko_z
... Still buggy. The following patch (for 2.0b3) fixes the config problem. It removes the part that defines twice both HAVE_GETADDRINFO and HAVE_GETNAMEINFO
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: sync.c:local_addr() use
2005-03-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... Hum, the -D_REENTRANT test is already there, but it was buggy. Try this patch, run autoconf and rebuild. Index: configure.ac
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: sync.c:local_addr() use
2005-03-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... Excellent. Would you contribute a configure test for that? Build a test with strtok_r with and without -D_REENTRANT, using -Werror, and if the second fail,
Re: sync.c:local_addr() use
2005-03-26 by ranko_z
... Ok, I have figured it out where the actual problem is: The code is threaded, however the _REENTRANT define is not declared anywhere during the compilation,
Re: sync.c:local_addr() use
2005-03-26 by ranko_z
... function can ... true - ... I ... the ... force ... bad ... Solaris ... True. bind() should have set errno to EADDRNOTAVAIL, however (here at least) to
Re: [milter-greylist] sync.c:local_addr() use
2005-03-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... (snip) ... I think your fix just ignore if the address is local or not, and force it to be non local. Here socket() returned a positive file descriptor,
sync.c:local_addr() use
2005-03-26 by Ranko Zivojnovic
Greetings, Apparently there is a slight problem in the way the local_addr() function in sync.c is being used. I have set up v1.6 in a test mode on a couple of
Re: [milter-greylist] Spammers vs. SPF
2005-03-25 by Matthias Scheler
... According to recepient: yes. ... It looks much like a zombie spam PC behind a DSL line. ... That would be to easy to catch. Kind regards -- Matthias
Re: [milter-greylist] Spammers vs. SPF
2005-03-25 by Matt Kettler
... As an anti-spam tool, SPF has been useless since the start anyway. Fortunately, SPF isn t an anti-spam tool, it s an anti forgery tool. Those who continue
Re: [milter-greylist] Spammers vs. SPF
2005-03-25 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Is it really a spammer? ie: it could be a legitimate MTA relaying some spam. If I d be a spammer, I d just have +all in my SPF record. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Spammers vs. SPF
2005-03-25 by Matthias Scheler
Hello, a while ago Emmanuel Dreyfus predicted that SPF will become useless quite quicky. Here is the proof: Mar 23 18:11:41 *** sm-mta[22869]: j2NHBe7b022869:
Re: [milter-greylist] libpthread problem building on Solaris 8?
2005-03-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... Send me config.log -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD: http://www.eyrolles.com/Informatique/Livre/9782212114638/livre-bsd.php
libpthread problem building on Solaris 8?
2005-03-25 by demian hanks
Hi all, I m trying to build milter-greylist-1.6 on a Solaris 8 system using gcc 3.3 and am having problems getting through the ./configure process. I get
Re: milter-greylist 1.6rc1 and Solaris 9 (sparc)
2005-03-23 by kihongchong
Hi, I am new to this list and have been running milter-greylist for about 2 weeks. Now i am trying to sync between 2 MTAs and am getting this same problem. I
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: domain acls not working in 2.0b3?
2005-03-23 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Here otcfwm02.carlson.com is the resolved DNS name of the connecting host, as handed out by sendmail. It is possible that the connecting host has several
Re: domain acls not working in 2.0b3?
2005-03-23 by kenedwardbrown
... into ... ( otcfwm02.carlson.com , carlson.com ) ... I thought that the intent of the domain keyword was to whitelist all incoming mail from a particular
Re: [milter-greylist] domain acls not working in 2.0b3?
2005-03-23 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... (snip) ... Why would you like otcfwm02.carlson.com to match crww.com? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
domain acls not working in 2.0b3?
2005-03-23 by kenedwardbrown
I recently rebuilt my mail server and upgraded my milter-greylist to the 2.0b3 release. Yesterday I send myself an email from my work email and noticed that it
Re: [milter-greylist] autowhite and timeout
2005-03-21 by H Li
... Thank you! Harvey __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Re: [milter-greylist] autowhite and timeout
2005-03-21 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... timeout: how long the tule remain in the greylist database autowhite: hiw long the tuple remain in the whitelist database. People usually prefer short
autowhite and timeout
2005-03-21 by H Li
Hi, I have a very basic question about autowhite and timeout. I m using v1.6. Which way to set them is better? set them the same (e.g. 7d), timeout is longer
Re: [milter-greylist] multiple recipients?
2005-03-20 by manu@netbsd.org
... The message comes with two recipients. Mark gets it immediatly and it it is tempfailed for jobn. The sender machine will retry later witha message only for
multiple recipients?
2005-03-20 by Jack Olszewski
Hello Group, Using milter-greylist 1.6 with sendmail 8.13.0. Question: What happens to a message addressed to more than one recipient, eg: john@xxx.yyy.zz
milter-greylist 2.0 beta 3 released
2005-03-19 by manu@netbsd.org
Hello all Here is the beta3 of milter-greylist 2.0: http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-2.0b3.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-2.0b3.tgz) =
Re: [milter-greylist] Why the use of basic regexes instead of extended?
2005-03-19 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, that s a call for problems. :-) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] username match, broken MTAs, timeout
2005-03-19 by manu@netbsd.org
... There is a beta for 2.0. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Le cahier de l admin BSD 2eme ed. est dans toutes les bonnes librairies
Re: [milter-greylist] Why the use of basic regexes instead of extended?
2005-03-19 by Matt Kettler
... I didn t have time to do it over the weekend, as I had trouble getting sendmail set up on my home machine, but I did get it done a few nights ago. This is
Re: [milter-greylist] username match, broken MTAs, timeout
2005-03-18 by Jack Olszewski
From: Subject: RE: [milter-greylist] username match, broken MTAs, timeout Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:45:58 +0100 attila.bruncsak ...
RE: [milter-greylist] username match, broken MTAs, timeout
2005-03-18 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... For the version 1.6 which is used by Jack the are needed. Probably there is no valid occurrences of spaces and tabs, but we should be prepared for
Re: [milter-greylist] username match, broken MTAs, timeout
2005-03-18 by manu@netbsd.org
... The change I made strips leading and trailing but does not handle leading and trailing space and tabs. De we really need it? I m not sure I saw any
RE: [milter-greylist] username match, broken MTAs, timeout
2005-03-18 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Hello, Try with rcpt /^[ ]*$/ as I am used to do until the next release (note there is one space and one tab in brackets).
Re: [milter-greylist] username match, broken MTAs, timeout
2005-03-18 by Jack Olszewski
... /^anna@x.../ as a workaround It does not seem to work. I ve put rcpt /^anna@hermes .net .au/ into greylist.conf, and got this: Mar 18 19:51:39 blue
Re: [milter-greylist] username match, broken MTAs, timeout
2005-03-18 by manu@netbsd.org
... Will be fixed in next release. In the meantime, you can use /^anna@xxx.yyy.zzz/ as a workaround ... I take the list from
username match, broken MTAs, timeout
2005-03-18 by Jack Olszewski
Hello Group, Apologies if the following questions have already been answered but my searches of the archive were unsuccessful. I am running milter-greylist 1.6
Re: Large DB
2005-03-17 by Klas Heggemann
(Perhaps there should be a place on the website where people can describe their servers and settings...) ... We have 17000 users and run several domains. We
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.0 beta2 stops working after awhile.
2005-03-17 by manu@netbsd.org
iewebguy wrote: [milter-greylist crashes] Usual things to check - if you have SPF support enabled, is your DNS resolver thread-safe? Run nm
milter-greylist 2.0 beta2 stops working after awhile.
2005-03-17 by iewebguy
Hello, I just installed milter-greylist 2.0 beta2 and it works well for a while, and then I get Milter (greylist): error connecting to filter: Connection
Re: [milter-greylist] Large DB
2005-03-16 by manu@netbsd.org
... Should be alright. It will just eat some memory. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD:
Large DB
2005-03-16 by -ray
Is anyone running milter-greylist in a large ISP or University environment? I ve been running it on a few users and it s working great, but worried about
Re: [milter-greylist] re: Delay calculation
2005-03-16 by Joseph Burford
... I see this as being a nice feature, to me I would probably prefer 1 over the DNS based option 2. Option 4 sounded good as well. Whatever the general