RE: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-16 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... My note wasn t specific to gmail.com in whitelising their servers if SPF matches. I used the term like gmail.com just for an example. There are other
Messages
Browse messages
Page 57 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-16 by Juergen Kleff
... may be I am missing something, but why would you want to whitelist spammers that don t comply to the standard? Isn t it that legitimate(!) mails form
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-16 by Michael Mansour
Hi Benoit, ... # rpm -qi libspf2 Name : libspf2 Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.2.5
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-15 by Benoit Branciard
... Which version of SPF2 is contained in the package libspf2 ? The API of libspf2 1.0 is incompatible with the one of later versions; you have to be sure your
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-15 by Michael Mansour
Hi, ... I have the libspf2 and libspf2-devel RPM s installed on my servers (RHEL4 based). I use the milter-greylist.spec and add a section in there as: %define
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-15 by Benoit Branciard
... You re right, I just verified Sendmail accepts envelope FROM s and RCPT s without angle brackets, and they are transmitted as-is to milter-greylist. So
RE: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-15 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Do the spammers know that they must comply to the standard? I already seen e-mail addresses in the envelop without opening .
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-15 by Benoit Branciard
... You need some version of libspf installed on your system (with devel headers) and the appropriate --with-libspfXX=YY option to your ./configure. For
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-15 by Benoit Branciard
... None of these are totally equivalents. - /.*@gmail .com/ and /@gmail .com/ *are* equivalents, and mean any address that contains the string @gmail.com .
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-15 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Yes and no: there was a typo. I meant racl whitelist from /@gmail .com$/ spf pass This is equivalent. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-15 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... Ok, this is nice. This is equivalent to: racl whitelist from /.*@gmail .com$/ spf pass yes? Michael.
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-15 by manu@netbsd.org
... Or better (don t start with deprecated syntax): racl whitelist from /@gmail .com / spf pass -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-15 by Michael Mansour
Hi Benoit, ... I ve been following this thread and would also like to whitelist gmail with valid spf. I run 4.1.1 Do I need to just do: racl whitelist from
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-14 by manu@netbsd.org
... Right. Perhaps I should resync the 4.0 branch with 4.1.x, as the new features seems quite stable. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-14 by Benoit Branciard
... So the envelope sender is mygoogleaccount@gmail.com, right ? Then it works. -- Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner pour des virus ou des polluriels et
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-14 by Benoit Branciard
... No, only in 4.1.1. SPF status code check has been added after 4.0 was released. But this example is a classical pass test, so in 4.0 it could be written:
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-14 by Adam Katz
... That does ~80% of the job, yes. Unfortunately, a good number of people out there send as From: myname@mydomain.net Sender: mygoogleaccount@gmail.com thus
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-14 by manu@netbsd.org
... The following ACL should work with 4.0: racl whitelist from /.*@gmail .com/ spf pass Nice, isn t it? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
Re: New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-14 by andrzej.marecki
... Except the last item - 74.125.0.0/16 - all else have been included in the template greylist.conf bundled with milter-greylist (ver. 4.0) sources. Thus, I d
Re: [milter-greylist] re: ipv6 (fwd)
2008-05-14 by manu@netbsd.org
... I don t see anything wrong, except that it s milter-greylist 3.0. What about trying the layest release? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
Re: [milter-greylist] New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-13 by Adam Katz
... Google s SMTP server farm is too big to pass greylisting. They have 139,000+ servers listed as legitimate in their SPF record, so if the odds of *ever*
New IPs of Google mail
2008-05-13 by Andrzej Marecki
I have just noticed that recently gmail.com mails also come from the addresses in the range from 74.125.46.24 to 74.125.46.63. However, these are not included
re: ipv6 (fwd)
2008-05-12 by Alan Clifford
... running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. It was created by milter-greylist configure 3.0, which was generated by GNU Autoconf
Re: [milter-greylist] re: ipv6
2008-05-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Please send config.log. I suspect you correctly requested IPv6 support but that configure dropped it because of some header trouble. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
re: ipv6
2008-05-11 by Alan Clifford
... I am having difficulty finding out how to do that. From ./configure --help, I d guess I need to use --enable-FEATURE[=ARG] include FEATURE [ARG=yes] with
Re: [milter-greylist] ipv6
2008-05-11 by Matthias Scheler
... This must be a problem on your system. milter-greylist works fine with my IPv6-enabled Sendmail setup for years. I guess the milter s were compiled
Re: [milter-greylist] ipv6
2008-05-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... That suggest milter-greylist was built without IPv6. Are you sure you are running the build you did? ... It seems you also have troubles with another
ipv6
2008-05-10 by Alan Clifford
I recompiled sendmail last night to use ipv6 and this seems to have upset greylisting (and others) from sources using ipv6. I am using milter-greylist-3.0 May
milter-greylist and drac
2008-05-09 by Hubertus A. Haniel
Hi, Does anybody on this list still use drac in conjunction wit milter-greylist-4.0? - I am still hitting issues compiling this in on opensuse 10.2:
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-24 by shuttlebox
... I have tried to modify to permissions to allow that but it was actually for page owners/creators, not for file owners/creators so I don t know if it had
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-24 by Ondrej Valousek
File uploaded & link created. The only unfortunate thing is, that I can not delete it. So if I wanted to upload some updated file (replacing the old one) in
Re: All mail seems to come from localhost
2008-04-24 by dougp25
... server ... milter-greylist-2.0.2 ... I think this line says it all: O DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-24 by shuttlebox
... Sorry for not noticing your application, the wiki doesn t seem to mail me a notification when someone applies. You re approved now though. If you upload
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-24 by Ondrej Valousek
As long as someone make me a member of the wiki, I ham happy to upload my script which analyses the sendmail logs and produces some statistics. The script
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: All mail seems to come from localhost
2008-04-24 by Michael Mansour
Hi, ... What IP s is sendmail listening on? Michael.
Re: All mail seems to come from localhost
2008-04-24 by dougp25
... I just wanted to add this update. Digging through the Scalix Admin guide, it talks about the SMTP Relay and it s config file, andit offers this pearl:
All mail seems to come from localhost
2008-04-24 by dougp25
I am using a semi-open source mailserver called scalix (http://scalix.com). I went this route because my users had to have the rich Outlook experience, and
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-23 by shuttlebox
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Chris Hoogendyk ... The issue wasn t with memory leaks but with file handles. A lot of work was done to combat that and Johann
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-23 by shuttlebox
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Chris Hoogendyk ... Since a resend will come as a new message it s hard to track absolute numbers at the greylist host. One
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-23 by Chris Hoogendyk
Ondrej Valousek wrote: ... AND ... I thought that in previous versions there had been issues, and some specifically with Solaris. I recall
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-23 by Chris Hoogendyk
... ... AND Ondrej Valousek wrote: ... Can either of you give specifics for how you determined those percentages and what they mean? Share
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-23 by Chris Hoogendyk
... Not milter-greylist s fault at all. We used to have some custom code embedded in milter-greylist that checked the popip.db to see if someone had checked
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-22 by manu@netbsd.org
... You should not need to restart it to get changes taken into account. But indeed sone change don t affect what you already have in memory. ... I have
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-22 by shuttlebox
... It s not an OS thing in my case, my Solaris servers stay up for years without problems. Isn t it strange that the database dump on disk is always 11-12 MB
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-22 by Ondrej Valousek
3 things: 1. I also saw milter-greylist crashed on Sunday morning. I did not know what was wrong, and then I noticed log rotating took place at that time -
Re: [milter-greylist] subnetmatch /24
2008-04-22 by shuttlebox
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Chris Hoogendyk ... I use milter-greylist from Blastwave on Solaris 10 with SMF support so it takes care of restarting
subnetmatch /24
2008-04-22 by Chris Hoogendyk
We re running milter-greylist 4.0 out of Sendmail 8.14.2 (we also have a number of other tools in the mix) on Solaris 9, SPARC. Last Friday, I uncommented the
Re: [milter-greylist] How to use www.senderbase.org ??
2008-04-21 by Adam Katz
... My script extrapolates data, creating a buffer around spammer IPs. The IP blocks are not *entirely* composed of blacklisted addresses, therefore this is
Re: [milter-greylist] How to use www.senderbase.org ??
2008-04-19 by shuttlebox
... Since I tempfail them before the DATA phase I don t really waste much. I haven t found a single RBL I trust to block outright, I regularly see servers from
Re: [milter-greylist] How to use www.senderbase.org ??
2008-04-19 by Mart Pirita
Tere. ... How many legal email have You received from these not know spammers yet? I presume none. Usually, if they appear in blacklist, their administrator