Milter-greylist

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Chris Hoogendyk
<hoogendyk@...> wrote:
>  I thought that in previous versions there had been issues, and some
>  specifically with Solaris. I recall exchanges on the list going over
>  coding specifics with respect to Solaris, and then manu indicating that
>  he thought it was fixed in the 4.0 betas. That is at least in part what
>  lead me to make the jump. And, as I said in my reply to manu's post on
>  this thread, milter-greylist has not gone down (and thereby caused my
>  greycheck script to take action) since I upgraded on Nov. 28.
>
>  That's not to say it hasn't been restarted. I've upgraded spamassassin
>  and sendmail during that time, and we've also been tweaking a lot of
>  other things that involve restarting sendmail. But, I no longer have to
>  worry about milter-greylist bombing out just out of the blue, so to speak.
>
>  So, shuttlebox, are you up on 4.0? Ondrej didn't say whether he was on
>  Solaris or not.

The issue wasn't with memory leaks but with file handles. A lot of
work was done to combat that and Johann Klasek has written a summary
of it on the wiki.

Yes, I'm on 4.0. I'm actually the Blastwave maintainer of
milter-greylist (and MailScanner and some more packages). I also
started the wiki so I was mainly plugging my own stuff. :-)

-- 
/peter