new rate limiting feature
2010-04-12 by manu@netbsd.org
Hello After some clients in our internal network started using our mail relays to send spam, I decided to create a rate limiting feature in milter-greylist.
Messages
Browse messages
Page 35 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
SABRINA MOUDOUD
2010-03-19 by H Li
http://glorious-design.com/lucky.html
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: How do you configure p0f?
2010-03-16 by Peter Bonivart
... Ok, so I thank you then. :-) -- /peter
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: How do you configure p0f?
2010-03-16 by Peter Bonivart
... I was just about to ask you to add this to the wiki but you read my mind: http://milter-greylist.wikidot.com/using-p0f ... -- /peter
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: How do you configure p0f?
2010-03-16 by Bill Levering
I added your info to the wiki: http://milter-greylist.wikidot.com/using-p0f Bill Levering idbill@planx.com KFP: 0C38 4D7E 5B50 94FE 992D 406D 6C81 DE33 5459
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: How do you configure p0f?
2010-03-16 by Adam Katz
... I don t recommend that as it will block lots of legitimate MS Exchange servers. This is in my config (feel free to change the delay time): # safe Windows
Re: [milter-greylist] How do you configure p0f?
2010-03-16 by manu@netbsd.org
... I have this in greylist.conf: p0fsock /var/run/p0f ... I use it with the stat statement, to log the remote OS. This is the %Fx substitution string. You
Re: How do you configure p0f?
2010-03-16 by Enrico Scholz
... p0fsock /var/run/p0frun/sock racl greylist p0f Windows.* delay 90m autowhite 1d msg Please come again later; mail from MS Windows based mailservers
Re: milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available
2010-03-16 by Enrico Scholz
... It would be better to use %bcond stuff (see /usr/lib/rpm/macros); e.g. %bcond_with p0f %bcond_without geoip ... %configure --with%{!?with_p0f:out}-p0f
How do you configure p0f?
2010-03-16 by Michael Mansour
Hi, I m not sure how to go through the configuration of p0f in milter-greylist. I ve searched the wiki and the web and couldn t find anything related to this.
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available
2010-03-16 by Michael Mansour
Hi, ... A few queries here: 1. How does one get changes applied to the spec? For dkim support, I added: %define p0f 1 %{?build_p0f:%define p0f 1} %define
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available
2010-03-16 by Dietmar Rieder
... Well so far it applies and compiles. Is there any documentation on the mx feature? Howto use it? Sorry but it seems that I m blind... Didi
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available
2010-03-16 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I understood he was looking for soemone to test the patch... -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available
2010-03-16 by Dietmar Rieder
... Sorry for the the delayed response, I was out of office.... Anyway, Hajimu UMEMOTO already contributed a patch for this, so thanks to him I don t need to
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available [1 Attachment]
2010-03-16 by Dietmar Rieder
... Sorry for the the delayed response, I was out of office.... Thank, you so much, it compiles now. Didi
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available [1 Attachment]
2010-03-15 by manu@netbsd.org
... Got it. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available [1 Attachment]
2010-03-15 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... adrieder Solaris 10 prototypes ns_name_uncompress() in arpa/nameser.h, but # adrieder doesn t export it from libresolv.so ume Perhaps, we can just
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available
2010-03-15 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... adrieder Solaris 10 prototypes ns_name_uncompress() in arpa/nameser.h, but # adrieder doesn t export it from libresolv.so Perhaps, we can just
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available
2010-03-15 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu Here is milter-greylist-4.3.5 snip manu Better configure test to avoid resolver memory leaks (Hajimu UMEMOTO) Unfortunately, there is
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available
2010-03-13 by manu@netbsd.org
... Will you contriute a patch fixing this issue? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available
2010-03-13 by Dietmar Rieder
... ...does not compily under Solaris 10 when configured using --enable-mx gcc -o milter-greylist milter-greylist.o pending.o sync.o dnsrbl.o list.o macro.o
Re: milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available
2010-03-13 by Enrico Scholz
... fwiw; the thread unsafety did not caused crashes but only wrong/missing results for p0f queries. Enrico
milter-greylist 4.3.5 is available
2010-03-13 by manu@netbsd.org
Here is milter-greylist-4.3.5 http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-4.3.5.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-4.3.5.tgz) =
development version link in official site is older
2010-03-08 by Kouhei Sutou
Hi, There is a development snapshot tgz link at http://hcpnet.free.fr/milter-greylist/ The version is 4.3.3 but 4.3.5 had been released. Could you fix the
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-28 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... dacl blacklist from /.*@gmail .com$/ dkim none msg Unverified, forged or non-existent DomainKeys/DKIM signature and that worked too. Do you
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-28 by manu@netbsd.org
... We told you nobody tested it :-) ... +++ conf_lex.l 2010-02-28 14:53:07.000000000 +0100 @@ -240,8 +240,12 @@ {self} { BEGIN(0); yylval.spf_status
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-28 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... It actually comes back with: config error at line 2097: syntax error Reading the man page again on it: dkim DKIM status (if build with DKIM
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-28 by manu@netbsd.org
... Looks fine. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-28 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... I ve spent about half a day working through this problem and finally have it compiling into milter-greylist. To compile milter-greylist with
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... That suggests there have been different dkim packages? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-27 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... I ve gone through every single release: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45536 Feb 22 2006 libdkim-1.0.10.zip -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 47250 Sep 11 2006
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... THe one that has dkim_init in its sources! -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-27 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... Which version should I try? The list on http://sourceforge.net/projects/libdkim/files/ shows: 1.0.21 1.0.19 1.0.17 1.0.14 1.0.13 etc? Thanks.
Our wiki just got spammed!
2010-02-26 by Peter Bonivart
I just got notifications of three updates on the wiki and that s quite rare so I checked them out and found that some idiot had inserted links to a crap site
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, nothing. Obviously the API changed. Your best bet is to try a previous version. Someone intereted by DKIM support will have to upgrade milter-greylist
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-26 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... The dkim.h that comes with the libdkim 1.0.19 RPM has this: # cat /usr/include/dkim.h
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... The closest thing is DKIMSignInit/DKIMVerifyInit. What about in the header files? Perhaps dkim_init is supposed to be a macro? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-26 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... # nm /usr/lib/libdkim.a dkim.o: 00000000 r DKIMErrorStrings 00000050 T DKIMGetErrorString 00000270 T DKIMSignFree 00000300 T DKIMSignGetSig
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... run this, do you have anything in it? Do you find something about dkim_init? (eg: unexpected captalization?) nm /usr/lib/libdkim.a nm -D /usr/lib/libdkim.a
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-26 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... # for i in /usr/lib/libdkim* ; do echo $i; nm $i|grep dkim_init ; done /usr/lib/libdkim.a Some other info: # file /usr/lib/libdkim.a
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... Now the question is: where is it? Please run this: for i in /usr/lib/libdkim* ; do echo $i; nm $i|grep dkim_init ; done -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-26 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, ... I checked this but it didn t make much sense to me. What do you think? configure:7173: checking for dkim_init in -ldkim -lsm -lcrypto
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... You need to look at config.log to see why the dkim_init test failed. Search for dkim_init, and you ll find a compliation attempts that fails, with an error
Compiling milter-greylist 4.3.4 with DKIM ?
2010-02-25 by Michael Mansour
Hi, I have libdkim installed: # rpm -ql libdkim /usr/include/dkim.h /usr/lib/libdkim.a /usr/share/doc/libdkim-1.0.19 /usr/share/doc/libdkim-1.0.19/LICENSE
Re: We need you for autoconf hacking (was: Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption)
2010-02-22 by Christian Pélissier
The patch has a missing ) $ gpatch -p0
Re: We need you for autoconf hacking (was: Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption)
2010-02-21 by Johann E. Klasek
... My answer was maybe too short: Sure, in case res_ninit is not a macro the simplyfied asumption from __RES = 19991006 is, that we have at least a Bind
Re: We need you for autoconf hacking
2010-02-20 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... If detecting res_ninit() by configure fails, detecting res_ndestroy() will fail, too. In such case, res_ninit() will still be used by (__RES =
[PATCH] Make p0f queries reentrant (was: Segfault due to non-reentrant GeoIP?)
2010-02-20 by Enrico Scholz
Do not share the p0fsock descriptor between several threads because resulting the connect - write - read - close sequence is racy. p0f protocol allows one
Re: We need you for autoconf hacking (was: Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption)
2010-02-20 by manu@netbsd.org
... Is it? I thought it was to test for res_n* availability. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: We need you for autoconf hacking (was: Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption)
2010-02-20 by Johann E. Klasek
... As mentioned before this condition was only a quick hack to cope with environments, where res_n* functions are not based on macros. It is not a general