Hi,
(2010/02/20 07:03), manu@... wrote:
> Is it a right move to remove the test on (__RES>= 19991006)? That one
> should be much more reliable than attempting to link a program.
If detecting res_ninit() by configure fails, detecting
res_ndestroy() will fail, too. In such case, res_ninit() will
still be used by (__RES>= 19991006) test with regardless of
the existence of res_ndestroy(). Then, it will end up with
the memory leakage in question.
I think this situation is not desirable. Since, the user will
notice that detecting res_ninit() fail, it is better, IMHO.
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@... ume@... ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/Message
Re: We need you for autoconf hacking
2010-02-20 by Hajimu UMEMOTO