Johann E. Klasek <johann@...> wrote: > > Is it a right move to remove the test on (__RES >= 19991006)? That one > > should be much more reliable than attempting to link a program. > > As mentioned before this condition was only a quick hack to > cope with environments, where res_n* functions are not based > on macros. Is it? I thought it was to test for res_n* availability. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: We need you for autoconf hacking (was: Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption)
2010-02-20 by manu@netbsd.org