On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:03:37PM +0100, manu@... wrote: > Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@...> wrote: > > > It seems bit redundant to me. How about the attached patch? It is > > against CVS version. > > Is it a right move to remove the test on (__RES >= 19991006)? That one > should be much more reliable than attempting to link a program. As mentioned before this condition was only a quick hack to cope with environments, where res_n* functions are not based on macros. It is not a general solution, it worked for Solaris (even there not in all situations), maybe for other too, but will be never safe as the autoconf check is. Johann E. K.
Message
Re: We need you for autoconf hacking (was: Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption)
2010-02-20 by Johann E. Klasek