Re: [milter-greylist] DKIM and ACL syntax
2010-09-10 by John Wood
... Alright, in an attempt to make some progress I tried using the milter-greylist dev tree ( 4.3.8 ). This has got the proper if (priv- priv_dkimstat !=
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 32 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
2010-09-10 by John Wood
... Alright, in an attempt to make some progress I tried using the milter-greylist dev tree ( 4.3.8 ). This has got the proper if (priv- priv_dkimstat !=
2010-09-10 by ffxiside
Additional info -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 800661 Sep 2 14:53 geoip-1.4.6-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7441 Sep 2 14:53
2010-09-10 by ffxiside
I habe two Servers (CentOS release 5.5 (Final)) on both i compiled milter-greylist-4.2.6. Both servers are identical patch wise. On one of the two server
2010-09-06 by John Wood
... Hrmph, it is not cooperating today. The gdb output is mostly useless: [ after bt ] (gdb) up Cannot access memory at address 0xbf000004 (gdb) info threads 7
2010-09-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... ctx is at unreachable address, this seems quite rotten. The interesing question is when did it happen: before kimcheck_eom or inside it? -- Emmanuel
2010-09-06 by John Wood
... Aye, I d actually tried that but it results in a crash/core. Sep 5 21:26:40 nyima milter-greylist: DKIM failed: Bad signature Sep 5 21:26:41 nyima
2010-09-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... This should probably be changed as: if (priv- priv_dkimstat != DKIM_STAT_OK) { Can you give it a try? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
2010-09-06 by John Wood
... OK, dkimcheck_header was the first breakpoint to trip: Breakpoint 7, dkimcheck_header (name=0x28865c80 DKIM-Signature , value=0x28865c8f v=1;
2010-09-03 by manu@netbsd.org
... Now you can stuff breakpoints in each dkim related function and see how it fills priv- priv_dkimstat -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
2010-09-03 by John Wood
... Strange, it never gets there. Rather, setting a break point for dkimcheck_error never results in a break (and no, there is nothing logged). This makes me
2010-09-03 by manu@netbsd.org
... Indeed, but perhaps we should focus on the first bug, that is: DKIM_STAT_NOSIG. In dkimcheck_error(), there is a log call. Do you get it in the logs? And
2010-09-03 by John Wood
... Alright, I ve done this by using gdb on a live session. The results are somewhat interesting: (gdb) break dkimcheck_validate Breakpoint 1 at 0x806b2d6:
2010-09-02 by manu@netbsd.org
... I amaffraid you will have to add a few printf in the code to debug this. In dkim.c, you will want to watch what happens to priv- priv_dkimstat -- Emmanuel
2010-09-01 by John Wood
... Sure, both ldd and nm show it (not stripped): nyima:~$ ldd /usr/local/bin/milter-greylist /usr/local/bin/milter-greylist: libGeoIP.so.5 =
2010-09-01 by manu@netbsd.org
... What do you get by running nm milter-greylist ? Any reference to dkim stuff? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2010-09-01 by John Wood
Greetings, Of late I have been attempting to use the DKIM support in milter-greylist. Where at first I thought it was working, I am now convinced that I have
2010-08-27 by x
It is not as if we have to restart the daemon every 10 minutes. I have 430 spams that passed through greylisting last 1 month. 400 of them is Your wifes photo
2010-08-27 by x
I only know COBOL :) I will have to brush up on that, it was few decades ago that I used it last time :) Keep us updated please when this feature is
2010-08-27 by Johann Klasek
... Why not just touch to main configuration file for signaling the daemon? Easier than a kill ... ... ... and if provided by means of an include-feature
2010-08-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... We could do that. We already have lists, their declaration syntax could be made more general, with two alternative syntaxes list badaddr {
2010-08-27 by x
Fine. What about giving us an option to load a file at startup then? You can put a warning saying a restart is required to read changes. D PS: Sorry for the
2010-08-27 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... That s an old problem: libmilter takes care of signals. As I understand it means milter-greylist cannot catch SIGHUP. I would appreciate a callback for it
2010-08-27 by x
... I don t understand why you need to reload or monitor them on each ACL evaluation? Or for that matter, what you need to reload or monitor them AT ALL? Just
2010-08-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... I thought about implementing that some time ago. The real difficulty is that you get a list of files for which you have to monitor changes. Reloading them
2010-08-27 by d d
It would be good to have acls read elements from files. Is this this implemented? For example, right now I have: dacl blacklist header /Your wife photos
2010-08-24 by Be Be
I m running milter-greylist version 4.2.3 Thanks, Linh Khuu To: milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com From: manu@netbsd.org Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:25:31 +0000
2010-08-24 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... What version? I recall of such a bug that had been fixed, but it may have reapeared. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2010-08-24 by kbebeus
Hello, I ve implemented the milter-greylist on 4 of the MX servers. However, I keep getting error from milter-greylist (on all 4 of the servers):
2010-08-24 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Given the observation that during the past several months the majority of all questions to this list were revolving around it despite its relative
2010-08-24 by manu@netbsd.org
... Improve it? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2010-08-24 by Adam Katz
... How used is the spamd option? I just started using it and have noticed that none of the X-Spam-* headers are present ... and milter-greylist doesn t have
2010-08-24 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I checked it in. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2010-08-24 by Adam Katz
I ve attached a diff that adds spamassassin toggling to the .spec file. -Adam
2010-07-27 by Peter Bonivart
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Marie-Goretti DEJEAN ... Are you using Blastwave or OpenCSW? I m pretty sure Blastwave is not up to date with the packages
2010-07-27 by Marie-Goretti DEJEAN
... I did it but I had the same error. Thanks Marie ... -- Marie-Goretti DEJEAN CIRM Marseille-Luminy http://www.cirm.univ-mrs.fr tel : 04.91.83.30.15 - fax :
2010-07-27 by Marie-Goretti DEJEAN
Hello ... no. I downloaded the tar.gz from http://hcpnet.free.fr/milter-greylist/ I had just install spamassassin with pkg-get, all the other packages were
2010-07-27 by Peter Bonivart
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Marie-Goretti DEJEAN ... I notice you say cswspamassassin, can I assume you use OpenCSW for your packages? Have you mixed CSW
2010-07-27 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... According to the sources, that can happen if you are out of memory, or if milter-greylist was build with a libmiter that has a version mismatch with your
2010-07-27 by Marie-Goretti DEJEAN
Hi, I installed sendmail 3-14.4, with clamav 96.1, procmail 3.22, cswspamassassin My machine is a sparc under solaris 10. the build, make and make install
2010-07-19 by Amardeo
Solved: Installing dovecot apparently changed sendmail.cf so some default value, so I had to recompile the m4 file with make and make install after adding
2010-07-18 by Amardeo Sarma
Hi, after using milter-greylist for quite some time without issues, I have run into problems around the time I installed the imap server dovecot. Though I can
2010-07-17 by John Espiro
Hello - I recently saw a few messages in my inbox that have the following in the header: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by
2010-07-15 by Petar Bogdanovic
... If you re using a more or less default SA configuration, this dacl will delay lots of messages. Example: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS and you re above one. When using
2010-07-14 by Greg Troxel
... The overall challenge is to not delay legit mail and to block spam or at least get it over 5 points. So I d write something like dacl blacklist spamd 10
2010-07-14 by vanaxel79
... best regards.
2010-07-14 by vanaxel79
The problem is if spamd stops it delete the socket. The inet that dons´t happened if is there, use the spamd if not bypass. thanks
2010-07-14 by Petar Bogdanovic
... We re doing something similar. But you re right.. it probably does not make much sense and the best reason that I can come up with for such a config is
2010-07-14 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Did you make sure that the file /var/run/spamd.sock exists? Are you running milter-greylist in a chrooted environment? Petar Bogdanovic
2010-07-14 by vanaxel79
With inet that doesn t happened, milter just bypass spamd.
2010-07-14 by vanaxel79
I´m going to try to use inet socket. thanks