On 08/23/2010 11:47 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:34:40PM -0700, Adam Katz wrote: >> I've attached a diff that adds spamassassin toggling to the .spec >> file. > > I checked it in. How used is the spamd option? I just started using it and have noticed that none of the X-Spam-* headers are present ... and milter-greylist doesn't have any format strings to compose new ones (e.g. %Fx for p0f). In order to have any feedback for my users to filter by, I'm stuck doing a hack like this: dacl blacklist spamd > 10 msg "Rejected as spam." dacl whitelist spamd > 8 addheader "X-MG-Spam: D - Probable (8-10)" dacl whitelist spamd >= 5 addheader "X-MG-Spam: C - Suspect (5-8)" dacl whitelist spamd <= 0 addheader "X-MG-Spam: A - No, Safe (<0)" dacl whitelist spamd < 5 addheader "X-MG-Spam: B - No (0-5)" Since individual rule matches can't be displayed, it's impossible for me to implement my autoresponder sanity check, which keyed on a third-party rule I wrote called NOT_A_PERSON (available in my khop-lists sa-update channel). Advice?
Message
spamd
2010-08-24 by Adam Katz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.