Re: [milter-greylist] Milter-greylist crashes on DragonFly-2.8
2011-01-23 by manu@netbsd.org
... Could you try replacing the assert(0) by a return ? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 31 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
2011-01-23 by manu@netbsd.org
... Could you try replacing the assert(0) by a return ? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2011-01-22 by Francois Tigeot
Hi! I have been running sendmail + milter-greylist 4.2.6 on a DragonFly host. I recently upgraded this machine to DragonFly-2.8 (from 2.6), and milter-greylist
2011-01-21 by Petar Bogdanovic
... dccifd(8) - Protocol : http://rhyolite.com/dcc/dcc-tree/dccifd.html
2011-01-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... Is there a library implementing the protocol? A documentation about it? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2011-01-21 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Like with spamd, there is a socket (dccifd afair) through which one can speak a pretty simple ascii protocol.
2011-01-21 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Spamassassin supports DCC (DCC.pm), milter-greylist supports spamassassin (see spamd acl). There is no direct DCC-support in milter-greylist yet.
2011-01-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... The patch does not apply against latest sources, neither does it against 4.2.6. Since the change is subttle and I am not a user of that file, I will not
2011-01-20 by Joe Pruett
i used the milter-greylist.m4 from 4.2.6 and it had the problem. why i (and maybe others) didn t see it earlier is that updating the .m4 file doesn t cause a
2011-01-20 by Joe Pruett
i ve attached my diff that fixes the issue. i m not sure it is the correct way to do sendmail m4 stuff, but it seems to function and fix the issue.
2011-01-20 by manu@netbsd.org
... We recently fixed such a problem in milter-greylist.m4 As far as I understand, the latest tarball contain the fixed .m4. Are you regenerating sendmail.cf
2011-01-20 by manu@netbsd.org
... Retaining only the host in the tuple is doomed to fail, as the spammer does not have to maintain a queue anymore in order to resend with the same (IP,
2011-01-20 by Joe Pruett
i recently upgraded to 4.2.6 with no troubles. i then installed it fresh on a new system and sendmail wouldn t start. i tracked it down to a trailing comma in
2011-01-19 by Delahunty, Mark
Hi I use sendmail, milter-greylist and mimedefang+spamassassin. I m getting lots of distributed dictionary attacks. I ve read that greylisting based on DCC
2010-12-17 by Michael Mansour
Hi Emmanuel, You re spot on, I modified sendmail.cf to add: Xgreylist, S=local:/var/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock, T=S:1m;R:1m The Timeouts at the end
2010-12-17 by Johann Klasek
... What about to increase the Milter loglevel? define(`confMILTER_LOG_LEVEL , `X )dnl X ... 1 Bad reply codes, socket errors, timeouts, reply and state errors
2010-12-17 by manu@netbsd.org
... That happens if the milter dies, or if sendmail decides the request to the milter has timed out. The later can easily happen when milter-greylist perfoms
2010-12-17 by Michael Mansour
Hi, I ve recently noticed I get a lot of these errors on mail servers: Dec 17 17:00:14 server sendmail[29303]: oBH6011k029303: Milter (greylist): timeout
2010-11-15 by John Wood
... It worked for me. The problem is fairly clear on lines 3217/3218: configure:6398: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall conftest.c -lmilter -lsmutil -lpthread
2010-11-15 by manu@netbsd.org
... It says: Unknown paste ID, it may have expired or been deleted! -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2010-11-14 by super_1337_2010
... I ve put config.log here: http://pastebin.com/gZp5AFKA - would somebody like to have a look at it? TIA.
2010-11-10 by manu@netbsd.org
... Great. I checked in your patch. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2010-11-10 by John Wood
... As it turns out, it was definitely beyond me. Thanks to Jörgen Lundman (lundman _at_ lundman.net), this is now working properly. The attached diff is for
2010-11-05 by Jean-Michel Bruenn
Hey Manu, thanks - i ll take a look :) Cheers Jean
2010-11-05 by manu@netbsd.org
... There is some DKIM code in milter-greylist, but it has never reached a usable state. Bugs have been tracked down, they just need to be fixed. See
2010-11-05 by Petar Bogdanovic
... Of course post-data greylisting works. How do you think spamd acls are implemented?
2010-11-05 by Ondrej Valousek
No. It can not. DKIM works in the data stage so no greylisting here.... O.
2010-11-05 by Jean-Michel Bruenn
Hello, i ve seen that milter-greylist can be used to do only greylisting if there is no spf record or the spf record shows that the sender is not allowed to
2010-10-29 by Christian Pélissier
Forget previous mail. ACL are working (whitelisting depends on ACL order if you use both list.dnswl.org and swl.spamhaus.org ). Here is a feedback from
2010-10-29 by Christian Pélissier
Since september 2010 spamhaus has also a whitelisting DNS service. See : http://www.spamhauswhitelist.com/en/ I have changed greylist.conf and add the
2010-10-22 by Carl Swart
dear friend how are you ? in 5-7 days will get the new Iphone 4 i order the Iphone4 from here i like it much . all best hope you try too
2010-10-19 by Bill Levering
The order is important. When a match is made, then the search ends. So if you have: list domainlist domain { mydomain.com myotherdomain.com } acl
2010-10-19 by manu@netbsd.org
... It does not matter. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2010-10-19 by phil844046
Hi Peter, Thanks for the response. Looks like we already using the lazyaw option so that s all good. Also in terms of my Question 2.. I ve answered that myself
2010-10-19 by Peter Bonivart
... It records tuples of sender, recipient and sending server. So if others from the same domain send you e-mail doesn t matter. Take a look at the lazyaw
2010-10-19 by phil844046
Hi There, I ve just taken over a Sendmail with Greylisting service and although I know about some of it I m having a few difficulties, hence here I am, and
2010-10-11 by Marcel Blenkers
Hi there, i was running milter-greylist Version 4.2.5 which compiled without any problems and i was able to use DNSRBL. But as i tried to compile V4.2.6 first
2010-09-24 by Mark Walker
I have this strange problem and was wondering if anybody has experienced anything like it. A sender s Outlook server seems to not to be able to handle
2010-09-23 by manu@netbsd.org
... Look at config.log for the exact error, there must be some linking issue that is weakly reported on stdout. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
2010-09-22 by Matthias Scheler
... BTW: your e-mail address causes bounces: Sep 22 16:56:59 colwyn postfix/smtp[25705]: 6DD8AA3B943: to= ,
2010-09-22 by super_1337_2010
I have tried to compile the latest stable milter-greylist (milter-greylist-4.2.6) on a largely unmodified Lenny system (sendmail-8.14.3-5+lenny1). The
2010-09-21 by Matthias Scheler
... Do you enable SPF? Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
2010-09-20 by John Wood
... Fixing it is probably a bit beyond me, just getting this right(?) is about the limit of my meager debug abilities. John
2010-09-17 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I think you spoted a bug. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2010-09-17 by John Wood
... Actually, before I do that I think I see what is wrong with dkim_verify. Rather, it seems to work but watch (data details obscured): Breakpoint 1,
2010-09-17 by John Wood
... I thought that might be the case, however it doesn t explain what is going on with dkim_verify when it sees a dkim header. I ll try pushing a signed
2010-09-17 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I suspect it should be initialized to DKIM_NOSIG, so that we get this result when there is no signature. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2010-09-17 by John Wood
Alright, I *think* I ve made some progress. ... Adjusting those appears to have made the strlen I reported earlier sane at both points. However, stepping
2010-09-17 by manu@netbsd.org
... In dkimcheck_validate(), shoudn t this: stat = ad ? *(enum spf_status *)ad : MGSPF_PASS; Be in fact something more like this (not tested, not even built)
2010-09-16 by John Wood
... Actually I think this is OK, sigh. *priv before line 809 is uninitialized and full of garbage/invalid data. Post 809 is populated with the correct data,
2010-09-16 by John Wood
... Well, I think this is it. Watch what happens to priv_dkim. (gdb) print priv- priv_dkim $17 = (DKIM *) 0xffb6afe8 (gdb) n 809 len = strlen(name)