Milter-greylist

I've attached a diff that adds spamassassin toggling to the .spec file.

-Adam

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:34:40PM -0700, Adam Katz wrote:
> I've attached a diff that adds spamassassin toggling to the .spec file.

I checked it in.


-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@...

On 08/23/2010 11:47 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:34:40PM -0700, Adam Katz wrote:
>> I've attached a diff that adds spamassassin toggling to the .spec
>> file.
> 
> I checked it in.

How used is the spamd option?  I just started using it and have
noticed that none of the X-Spam-* headers are present ... and
milter-greylist doesn't have any format strings to compose new ones
(e.g. %Fx for p0f).  In order to have any feedback for my users to
filter by, I'm stuck doing a hack like this:

dacl blacklist spamd > 10 msg "Rejected as spam."
dacl whitelist spamd >  8 addheader "X-MG-Spam: D - Probable (8-10)"
dacl whitelist spamd >= 5 addheader "X-MG-Spam: C - Suspect (5-8)"
dacl whitelist spamd <= 0 addheader "X-MG-Spam: A - No, Safe (<0)"
dacl whitelist spamd <  5 addheader "X-MG-Spam: B - No (0-5)"

Since individual rule matches can't be displayed, it's impossible for
me to implement my autoresponder sanity check, which keyed on a
third-party rule I wrote called NOT_A_PERSON (available in my
khop-lists sa-update channel).

Advice?

Adam Katz <yegsa-yahoo@...> wrote:

> Advice?

Improve it?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:48:28AM -0700, Adam Katz wrote:
> On 08/23/2010 11:47 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:34:40PM -0700, Adam Katz wrote:
> >> I've attached a diff that adds spamassassin toggling to the .spec
> >> file.
> > 
> > I checked it in.
> 
> How used is the spamd option?

Given the observation that during the past several months the majority
of all questions to this list were revolving around it despite its
relative newness..  I'd guess it's quite popular by now.


> Since individual rule matches can't be displayed, it's impossible for
> me to implement my autoresponder sanity check, which keyed on a
> third-party rule I wrote called NOT_A_PERSON (available in my
> khop-lists sa-update channel).

When Manuel (the other Manuel) wrote this extension we didn't feel a
need for format strings so they weren't included.  Feel free to post
a patch.

		Petar Bogdanovic