Modular Synth Panels

The Bridechamber

Jealous Edison Record Kompany

http://tinyurl.com/m8fntz

On Aug 22, 2009, at 3:55 PM, John L Rice wrote:

Wow, tough call! If I were doing it for myself, I would do one of two things. If I went with the horizontal version I’d go off the standard MOTM grid and move filter A’s jacks up into the section with the controls and move section B down a bit etc. But if I really was going to build this I would do the vertical design but in 2U instead of 3U by combining the Frequency and Frequency CV controls into a dual concentric pot (if possible), moving the Mode switches down to where the Frequency CV controls were and then move the Input jacks up and the Output jacks over underneath the Input jacks.

John L Rice

From: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:ModularSynt hPanels@yahoogro ups.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:16 PM
To: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [ModularSynthPanels ] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
ModularSynthPanels group:

For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.

o Vertical
o Horizontal

To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/ModularSyn thPanels/ surveys?id= 2220793

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-22 by Richard Brewster

This is a difficult panel. It doesn't fit into 2U. I voted for the
vertical, because I didn't like switches mixed in with jacks on the
bottom on the horizontal design.

Richard Brewster
http://pugix.com

Scott Deyo wrote:

>
>
> Yeah, I always balk at moving jack above pots, though that's a little
> silly. If you have more than one row of modules, you're going to get
> cords over your pots anyway, right?
> What do others feel about this?
>
> I really wanted to do 2U, but I don't think folks (and I count myself
> as one of these folks) have access to concentric pots.
>
> Scott Deyo
> contact@... <mailto:contact@...>
> The Bridechamber
> www.bridechamber.com <http://www.bridechamber.com>
> Jealous Edison Record Kompany
> www.jealousedison.com <http://www.jealousedison.com>
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 22, 2009, at 3:55 PM, John L Rice wrote:
>
>>
>> Wow, tough call! If I were doing it for myself, I would do one of
>> two things. If I went with the horizontal version I’d go off the
>> standard MOTM grid and move filter A’s jacks up into the section with
>> the controls and move section B down a bit etc. But if I really was
>> going to build this I would do the vertical design but in 2U instead
>> of 3U by combining the Frequency and Frequency CV controls into a
>> dual concentric pot (if possible), moving the Mode switches down to
>> where the Frequency CV controls were and then move the Input jacks up
>> and the Output jacks over underneath the Input jacks.
>>
>>
>>
>> John L Rice
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com
>> [mailto:ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com]
>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:16 PM
>> *To:* ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com
>> *Subject:* [ModularSynthPanels] New poll for ModularSynthPanels
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
>> ModularSynthPanels group:
>>
>> For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical
>> or horizontal layout?
>> They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.
>>
>> o Vertical
>> o Horizontal
>>
>> To vote, please visit the following web page:
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ModularSynthPanels/surveys?id=2220793
>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ModularSynthPanels/surveys?id=2220793>
>>
>> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
>> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
>> web site listed above.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-22 by Scott K Warren

Definitely no moving jacks above pots! Very important part of the MOTM layout style.

What if the Mode switch were a 4-position slide switch? Would it fit beside the CV Invert switch to make a 2U layout? I see from the schematic that it's only single pole, and SP4T slide switches are readily available. For instance Digi-Key has this one for $2:

If it wouldn't fit, could we replace the CV Invert switch by a switch on the Frequency CV pot, to make more room for the Mode slide switch? Maybe a switched pot is a little easier to find than concentric ones? For instance Digi-Key has this 100K linear carbon switched pot for $3.50:

http://tinyurl.com/mu8x9e

I'd really like a 2U layout.

skw

On Aug 22, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Scott Deyo wrote:

Yeah, I always balk at moving jack above pots, though that's a little silly. If you have more than one row of modules, you're going to get cords over your pots anyway, right?
What do others feel about this?

I really wanted to do 2U, but I don't think folks (and I count myself as one of these folks) have access to concentric pots.

Scott Deyo
contact@...
The Bridechamber
www.bridechamber.com
Jealous Edison Record Kompany
www.jealousedison.com

On Aug 22, 2009, at 3:55 PM, John L Rice wrote:

Wow, tough call! If I were doing it for myself, I would do one of two things. If I went with the horizontal version I’d go off the standard MOTM grid and move filter A’s jacks up into the section with the controls and move section B down a bit etc. But if I really was going to build this I would do the vertical design but in 2U instead of 3U by combining the Frequency and Frequency CV controls into a dual concentric pot (if possible), moving the Mode switches down to where the Frequency CV controls were and then move the Input jacks up and the Output jacks over underneath the Input jacks.

John L Rice

From: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:ModularSynt hPanels@yahoogro ups.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:16 PM
To: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [ModularSynthPanels ] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
ModularSynthPanels group:

For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.

o Vertical
o Horizontal

To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/ModularSyn thPanels/ surveys?id= 2220793

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-22 by Scott K Warren

Oops, maybe the SPST switch on that pot isn't enough to implement the cv invert feature? Somebody smarter than me needs to address that.

skw

On Aug 22, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Scott K Warren wrote:

Definitely no moving jacks above pots! Very important part of the MOTM layout style.

What if the Mode switch were a 4-position slide switch? Would it fit beside the CV Invert switch to make a 2U layout? I see from the schematic that it's only single pole, and SP4T slide switches are readily available. For instance Digi-Key has this one for $2:

http://tinyurl.com/m8fntz

If it wouldn't fit, could we replace the CV Invert switch by a switch on the Frequency CV pot, to make more room for the Mode slide switch? Maybe a switched pot is a little easier to find than concentric ones? For instance Digi-Key has this 100K linear carbon switched pot for $3.50:

http://tinyurl.com/mu8x9e

I'd really like a 2U layout.

skw

On Aug 22, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Scott Deyo wrote:

Yeah, I always balk at moving jack above pots, though that's a little silly. If you have more than one row of modules, you're going to get cords over your pots anyway, right?
What do others feel about this?

I really wanted to do 2U, but I don't think folks (and I count myself as one of these folks) have access to concentric pots.

Scott Deyo
contact@...
The Bridechamber
www.bridechamber.com
Jealous Edison Record Kompany
www.jealousedison.com

On Aug 22, 2009, at 3:55 PM, John L Rice wrote:

Wow, tough call! If I were doing it for myself, I would do one of two things. If I went with the horizontal version I’d go off the standard MOTM grid and move filter A’s jacks up into the section with the controls and move section B down a bit etc. But if I really was going to build this I would do the vertical design but in 2U instead of 3U by combining the Frequency and Frequency CV controls into a dual concentric pot (if possible), moving the Mode switches down to where the Frequency CV controls were and then move the Input jacks up and the Output jacks over underneath the Input jacks.

John L Rice

From: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:ModularSynt hPanels@yahoogro ups.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:16 PM
To: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [ModularSynthPanels ] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
ModularSynthPanels group:

For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.

o Vertical
o Horizontal

To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/ModularSyn thPanels/ surveys?id= 2220793

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-22 by Scott Deyo

Well, the way I see it we need at minimum, for each filter, four pots, a rotary or something like that, and three jacks.

Four-position slide? It's defo non-MOTM standard...

Scott Deyo

The Bridechamber

Jealous Edison Record Kompany

On Aug 22, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Scott K Warren wrote:

Definitely no moving jacks above pots! Very important part of the MOTM layout style.

What if the Mode switch were a 4-position slide switch? Would it fit beside the CV Invert switch to make a 2U layout? I see from the schematic that it's only single pole, and SP4T slide switches are readily available. For instance Digi-Key has this one for $2:

http://tinyurl. com/m8fntz

If it wouldn't fit, could we replace the CV Invert switch by a switch on the Frequency CV pot, to make more room for the Mode slide switch? Maybe a switched pot is a little easier to find than concentric ones? For instance Digi-Key has this 100K linear carbon switched pot for $3.50:

http://tinyurl. com/mu8x9e

I'd really like a 2U layout.

skw

On Aug 22, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Scott Deyo wrote:

Yeah, I always balk at moving jack above pots, though that's a little silly. If you have more than one row of modules, you're going to get cords over your pots anyway, right?
What do others feel about this?

I really wanted to do 2U, but I don't think folks (and I count myself as one of these folks) have access to concentric pots.

Scott Deyo
contact@bridechambe r.com
The Bridechamber
www.bridechamber. com
Jealous Edison Record Kompany
www.jealousedison. com

On Aug 22, 2009, at 3:55 PM, John L Rice wrote:

Wow, tough call! If I were doing it for myself, I would do one of two things. If I went with the horizontal version I’d go off the standard MOTM grid and move filter A’s jacks up into the section with the controls and move section B down a bit etc. But if I really was going to build this I would do the vertical design but in 2U instead of 3U by combining the Frequency and Frequency CV controls into a dual concentric pot (if possible), moving the Mode switches down to where the Frequency CV controls were and then move the Input jacks up and the Output jacks over underneath the Input jacks.

John L Rice

From: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:ModularSynt hPanels@yahoogro ups.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:16 PM
To: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [ModularSynthPanels ] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
ModularSynthPanels group:

For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.

o Vertical
o Horizontal

To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/ModularSyn thPanels/ surveys?id= 2220793

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-23 by Richard Brewster

What about moving up the rotary switches to align with the pots on either side and locating the CV Invert toggle switches right below the rotaries, also between and aligned with two pots? All jacks at the bottom. There would be space for a second CV input for each filter. This would be a variant of the horizontal design, placing all the controls for each filter together, but isolating the jacks at the bottom, MOTM-style.

Richard Brewster
http://pugix.com

Scott Deyo wrote:

Well, the way I see it we need at minimum, for each filter, four pots, a rotary or something like that, and three jacks.

Four-position slide? It's defo non-MOTM standard...

Scott Deyo

contact@...

The Bridechamber

www.bridechamber.com

Jealous Edison Record Kompany

www.jealousedison.com

On Aug 22, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Scott K Warren wrote:

Definitely no moving jacks above pots! Very important part of the MOTM layout style.

What if the Mode switch were a 4-position slide switch? Would it fit beside the CV Invert switch to make a 2U layout? I see from the schematic that it's only single pole, and SP4T slide switches are readily available. For instance Digi-Key has this one for $2:

http://tinyurl. com/m8fntz

If it wouldn't fit, could we replace the CV Invert switch by a switch on the Frequency CV pot, to make more room for the Mode slide switch? Maybe a switched pot is a little easier to find than concentric ones? For instance Digi-Key has this 100K linear carbon switched pot for $3.50:

http://tinyurl. com/mu8x9e

I'd really like a 2U layout.

skw

On Aug 22, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Scott Deyo wrote:

Yeah, I always balk at moving jack above pots, though that's a little silly. If you have more than one row of modules, you're going to get cords over your pots anyway, right?
What do others feel about this?

I really wanted to do 2U, but I don't think folks (and I count myself as one of these folks) have access to concentric pots.

Scott Deyo

contact@bridechambe r.com

The Bridechamber

www.bridechamber. com

Jealous Edison Record Kompany

www.jealousedison. com

On Aug 22, 2009, at 3:55 PM, John L Rice wrote:

Wow, tough call! If I were doing it for myself, I would do one of two things. If I went with the horizontal version I’d go off the standard MOTM grid and move filter A’s jacks up into the section with the controls and move section B down a bit etc. But if I really was going to build this I would do the vertical design but in 2U instead of 3U by combining the Frequency and Frequency CV controls into a dual concentric pot (if possible), moving the Mode switches down to where the Frequency CV controls were and then move the Input jacks up and the Output jacks over underneath the Input jacks.

John L Rice

From: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:ModularSynt hPanels@yahoogro ups.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:16 PM
To: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [ModularSynthPanels ] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
ModularSynthPanels group:

For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.

o Vertical
o Horizontal

To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/ModularSyn thPanels/ surveys?id= 2220793

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-23 by Scott Deyo

Well, you can almost always fit a toggle somewhere, and the CV Invert is just there because there's plenty of room. We could even get rid of them and add an Inverted CV Input with attenuator, kind of like Richard said.

The reason I was going towards switches and "non-standard" MOTM spacing (does this really mean anything anymore, with MOTM using different knobs and LED displays and such?) was to set it visually apart from other modules in the system.

I just don't see any way the 2U will work, and I'd like to skip the small-pot spacing on this one.

You're still getting two full state-variable filters in 3U....

Scott Deyo

The Bridechamber

Jealous Edison Record Kompany

On Aug 22, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Scott K Warren wrote:

Oops, maybe the SPST switch on that pot isn't enough to implement the cv invert feature? Somebody smarter than me needs to address that.

skw

On Aug 22, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Scott K Warren wrote:

Definitely no moving jacks above pots! Very important part of the MOTM layout style.

What if the Mode switch were a 4-position slide switch? Would it fit beside the CV Invert switch to make a 2U layout? I see from the schematic that it's only single pole, and SP4T slide switches are readily available. For instance Digi-Key has this one for $2:

http://tinyurl. com/m8fntz

If it wouldn't fit, could we replace the CV Invert switch by a switch on the Frequency CV pot, to make more room for the Mode slide switch? Maybe a switched pot is a little easier to find than concentric ones? For instance Digi-Key has this 100K linear carbon switched pot for $3.50:

http://tinyurl. com/mu8x9e

I'd really like a 2U layout.

skw

On Aug 22, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Scott Deyo wrote:

Yeah, I always balk at moving jack above pots, though that's a little silly. If you have more than one row of modules, you're going to get cords over your pots anyway, right?
What do others feel about this?

I really wanted to do 2U, but I don't think folks (and I count myself as one of these folks) have access to concentric pots.

Scott Deyo
contact@bridechambe r.com
The Bridechamber
www.bridechamber. com
Jealous Edison Record Kompany
www.jealousedison. com

On Aug 22, 2009, at 3:55 PM, John L Rice wrote:

Wow, tough call! If I were doing it for myself, I would do one of two things. If I went with the horizontal version I’d go off the standard MOTM grid and move filter A’s jacks up into the section with the controls and move section B down a bit etc. But if I really was going to build this I would do the vertical design but in 2U instead of 3U by combining the Frequency and Frequency CV controls into a dual concentric pot (if possible), moving the Mode switches down to where the Frequency CV controls were and then move the Input jacks up and the Output jacks over underneath the Input jacks.

John L Rice

From: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:ModularSynt hPanels@yahoogro ups.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:16 PM
To: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [ModularSynthPanels ] New poll for ModularSynthPanels

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
ModularSynthPanels group:

For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.

o Vertical
o Horizontal

To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/ModularSyn thPanels/ surveys?id= 2220793

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!

Re: New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-23 by joshdaigleusa

I think I prefer the vertical design.

--- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
>
> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> ModularSynthPanels group:
>
> For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
> They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.
>
> o Vertical
> o Horizontal
>
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ModularSynthPanels/surveys?id=2220793
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> web site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>

Re: New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-23 by babysealclub

Well I think I'd like a second audio input with an attenuator (for each filter) and a jack for the -CV. That would fill the panel nicely. I'd also normalize Out A to In B, and maybe Out B to my proposed attenuated Input on A for feedback (if it works!) But of course, I've never been dissapointed with a Bridechamber panel design.

-TF

--- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
>
> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> ModularSynthPanels group:
>
> For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
> They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.
>
> o Vertical
> o Horizontal
>
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ModularSynthPanels/surveys?id=2220793
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> web site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>

Re: New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-23 by sduck409

I don't like either. It definitely can and should be a 2u design. Use small knobs. Personally I don't have any attachment to the motm knob grid - modules that go off the grid make the modular easier to use IMHO - easier to find the appropriate knob while tweaking. The only design elements that I find unchangeable is the jack grid at the bottom and a black background (sorry modcan) - again, just MHO.

Sorry. Conserving space in my modular is a major concern of mine. Even though I have 4x24u to work with here, it's going to fill up, and I don't really have room after that. I've taken quite a few things that used to be 2u and made them 1u.

--- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
>
> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> ModularSynthPanels group:
>
> For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
> They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.
>
> o Vertical
> o Horizontal
>
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ModularSynthPanels/surveys?id=2220793
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> web site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Re: New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-24 by Scott Deyo

I have nothing against the small-knob layout, but the rotary switch causes the problem there, not only behind the panel, but for the silkscreen legending.

Another possibility -- a "Spread" control like the "Divergence" control in the Cyndustries module. I'd just implement it with a dual-gang pot, so we wouldn't have to add any circuitry. I wonder how she did the Series/ Parallel control. I assume she used the same PCB, right? Probably she did it passively. Anyone know?

Scott Deyo

The Bridechamber

Jealous Edison Record Kompany

On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:02 PM, sduck409 wrote:

I don't like either. It definitely can and should be a 2u design. Use small knobs. Personally I don't have any attachment to the motm knob grid - modules that go off the grid make the modular easier to use IMHO - easier to find the appropriate knob while tweaking. The only design elements that I find unchangeable is the jack grid at the bottom and a black background (sorry modcan) - again, just MHO.

Sorry. Conserving space in my modular is a major concern of mine. Even though I have 4x24u to work with here, it's going to fill up, and I don't really have room after that. I've taken quite a few things that used to be 2u and made them 1u.

--- In ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com, ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com wrote:
>
>
> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> ModularSynthPanels group:
>
> For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
> They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.
>
> o Vertical
> o Horizontal
>
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
> http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/ModularSyn thPanels/ surveys?id= 2220793
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> web site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Re: New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-26 by Scott Deyo

Not sure if the second audio input will work without a mixer. It goes straight into the CMOS.

Maybe I'll just do a big yellow wasp in the middle ; )

Scott Deyo

The Bridechamber

Jealous Edison Record Kompany

On Aug 23, 2009, at 9:38 AM, babysealclub wrote:

Well I think I'd like a second audio input with an attenuator (for each filter) and a jack for the -CV. That would fill the panel nicely. I'd also normalize Out A to In B, and maybe Out B to my proposed attenuated Input on A for feedback (if it works!) But of course, I've never been dissapointed with a Bridechamber panel design.

-TF

--- In ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com, ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com wrote:
>
>
> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> ModularSynthPanels group:
>
> For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
> They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.
>
> o Vertical
> o Horizontal
>
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
> http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/ModularSyn thPanels/ surveys?id= 2220793
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> web site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Re: New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-26 by david wright

one vote for big yellow wasp 3u

On Aug 25, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Scott Deyo wrote:

Not sure if the second audio input will work without a mixer. It goes straight into the CMOS.
Maybe I'll just do a big yellow wasp in the middle ; )

Scott Deyo
contact@bridechambe r.com
The Bridechamber
www.bridechamber. com
Jealous Edison Record Kompany
www.jealousedison. com

On Aug 23, 2009, at 9:38 AM, babysealclub wrote:

Well I think I'd like a second audio input with an attenuator (for each filter) and a jack for the -CV. That would fill the panel nicely. I'd also normalize Out A to In B, and maybe Out B to my proposed attenuated Input on A for feedback (if it works!) But of course, I've never been dissapointed with a Bridechamber panel design.

-TF

--- In ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com, ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com wrote:
>
>
> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> ModularSynthPanels group:
>
> For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
> They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.
>
> o Vertical
> o Horizontal
>
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
> http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/ModularSyn thPanels/ surveys?id= 2220793
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> web site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>

dave wright

www.notbreathing.com

bastardita@...

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Re: New poll for ModularSynthPanels

2009-08-26 by Scott Deyo

I should do two, fer shits n giggles.

Scott Deyo

The Bridechamber

Jealous Edison Record Kompany