2004-06-28 by Chris Whitten
> As so often happens with my posts, regardless of the forum, people > edit out the important (and usually complimentary) portion of what I > say, leaving only the negative observation I don't think you should worry too much. Obviously people read your original post and could mak
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by Doug Pearson
--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, Les Mizzell wrote: > My guess would be that that vast majority of orchestra music being > written today is for film scores. A huge improvement (when it actually happens) over the proliferation of sample CD's, pop songs, and cheezy presets that o
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by Doug Pearson
--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "konkuro" wrote: > ... why should a modular be portable? You're joking, right? Some of us carry them to gigs, you know (this is nothing new, I seem to recall that certain of the original series of Moog modulars contained the designation "p" as p
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by konkuro
Grant wrote: >Printed circuit board houses routinely do precision drilling, plating and silkscreening from a single vendor. The least expensive way to make faceplates would be to make them from printed circuit board material (fiberglass). You could put a continuous ground plane o
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by Christophe Curtis
Hi I was just wondering why my borg filter and waveform city have the same model number. Totally irrelevant I know but it did pique my curiousity. Both are screened as Model GR 342. Chris _________________________________________________________________ Watch the online reality s
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by konkuro
*Sigh* Chris, Chris, Chris. As so often happens with my posts, regardless of the forum, people edit out the important (and usually complimentary) portion of what I say, leaving only the negative observation, which others who haven't read the original quote will glom onto like lam
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by verbos2002
--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "grantrichter2001" wrote: > > Printed circuit board houses routinely do precision drilling, > plating and silkscreening from a single vendor. The least > expensive way to make faceplates would be to make them from > printed circuit board materia
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by Gary Chang
--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "mrboningen" wrote: > OK, I agree, the Blacet format is not the nicest looking modular out > there (I have to say Gary's large blue Wiard system is the nicest > thing I have ever seen), but functionally and price wise I have > absolutely no comp
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by Chris Whitten
> It is no longer a question of producing an ideal modular. It is a > question of continuing to produce a usable, affordable modular > with reasonable lead times for delivery. I agree. BTW, I don't think I'd mind fibreglass faceplates.
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by Gary Chang
> Yes. Paul Schreiber is now missing one designer. Getting him into > a pie with four and nineteen blackbirds was a bit of a struggle, > though. For what it is worth, I think that Paul's choosing of his relationship with his son over his relationship with us and his synthesizer b
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by chorus72000
Hi All,7 here. Anyone own the Blacet Final filter and the Filthy filter? I'm wondering about the differences and if anyone could recommend which one to get? Thanks in advance... 7
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by grantrichter2001
> >I would agree that "large format" modules that use a lot of metal > in construction are now too expensive to sustain. However, the > "small format" modulars which use very little metal in > construction seem to be doing all right. Every time I order a > Blacet module, it shows
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by mrboningen
> i don't agree about the panel size. fracrack is just fine. > it is not too big and saves a lot of studio space. > if your system is large, it is more economic to have the > modules nearby instead of several meters away. > it also saves a bit of money, which can be spend on > mo
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by mrboningen
"konkuro" wrote: > Shun the Fracrack and shun it NOW. It is an obligation...nay, my > SACRED DUTY to talk you out of the Fracrack format. There is much to > admire about Blacet, but not the format, which is trancendentally > horrid. Hey chill dude, it's not THAT bad! Some of us (
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by Ingo Zobel
--- konkuro schrieb: > Grant wrote: > > >I would agree that "large format" modules that use a lot of metal > in construction are now too expensive to sustain. However, the > "small format" modulars which use very little metal in > construction seem to be doing all right. Every ti
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by Chris Whitten
> It was robotic and lacking in timbral variation What do you expect in just a few hours work? If I'd have been Gary I'd have rather had the day off.
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by Chris Whitten
> In fact, customers NEVER say a bad word, >> offer to pay in advance, and NEVER complain about >> delivery dates Yeah, I agree with EVERYTHING except that last part. I've paid in advance, but waited lengthy periods without the modules I wanted/needed for certain projects. That's
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by konkuro
Grant wrote: >I would agree that "large format" modules that use a lot of metal in construction are now too expensive to sustain. However, the "small format" modulars which use very little metal in construction seem to be doing all right. Every time I order a Blacet module, it sh
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-28 by konkuro
Gary wrote: >Please find posted in the files section "Switched On Konkuro" - Bach 2 Part Invention #1, which I have entitled "the crow variation" (hmmm I hear that they are mighty tasty this time of the year....) Johnm, it's not fantastic, but I'll bet that 36 hours is a lot less
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by its_peake
--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, Paul Schreiber wrote: > Here are important lessons I think both Grant & I have > learned (still learning?) from the last couple of > years. > > 1) there is nothing more rewarding than to have > somebody you know and respect (Gary Chang/Robert Ri
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by Les Mizzell
> In the UK, tv companies can use pre-recorded music with very little > financial outlay and merely by signing a few release forms. I now find > myself not competing with Hans Zimmer or Elliot Gouldentahl, but Arvo Part, > Steve Reich and Miles Davis...............composers not o
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by (i think you can figure that out)
In another word: Blacet Mixer/Processor. OK OK OK - that's three words. --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Chang" wrote: > In a word, MIXOLATOR. > > gary > > --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "Rob" wrote: > > Are there any? Maybe the Blacet Mixer-Processor? > > > > Thanks,
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by (i think you can figure that out)
Gary - Reagrdng the Bach: MAN - i LOVE that TC reverb!!!!!! Great job. I dig the doubling on the left hand counterpoint - really, really cool. - P
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by Gary Chang
Please find posted in the files section "Switched On Konkuro" - Bach 2 Part Invention #1, which I have entitled "the crow variation" (hmmm I hear that they are mighty tasty this time of the year....) All Wiard - all parts realtime. One pass. Of, course, all due respect to Ms. Car
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by Chris Whitten
> ...and you end up with 379 TV Shows, documentaries, movies or album > projects that had "Digital Native Dance" on them all at the same time. LOL. Yeah I remember that. The same is becoming true of the samples on 'Distorted Reality' IMO. The same guy is probably responsible for
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by drmabuce
Hi All, I apologize to anyone trying to make sense of my last post. My prose is convoluted and oblique enough as it is without the added challenge of trying to read around randomly embedded = signs. This has been a long-standing battle, and if anyone has any sure fire remedies i'
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by Les Mizzell
This is a great discussion, by the way. I know it's not Wiard specific, but..... > Years ago, I saw the trend in the music industry - everybody had a > garage sale in December, selling off this year's instruments so that > we had money buy the new gear at NAMM in January; ...and
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by grantrichter2001
> these instruments - the patch potential of the factory designed > system. The genius was the systems, not the modules. > >> > Not ot blow my own horn but, the original six Wiard mdoules were configured as a system. The Woggle Bug and Borg Filters expanded that system. But it is
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by grantrichter2001
That is a longish technical discussion. Zero is an important number in math because zero times anything is zero, so you can use it to shut modulation sources "off". There are two types of inputs traditionally used. One is a uni-polar that goes from zero to a positive value. This
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by Chris Whitten
> A keyboard is essentially a voltage divider and consequently > requires the oscillator to track accurately. With a sequencer, > however, you adust the voltage of each stage or key individually. > That's why even the cheapest oscillator can be used. That works if you're using on
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 6/27/2004 2:15:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time, drmabuce@yahoo.com writes: BIG Thanx to all of you for `opening the kimono' for this discussion -Doc doc, too much philosophy for so late on a saturday night.......................... :^) whether system or assemblage
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by kirkdegiorgio
"If you're doing any type symphonic simulations, playing with all ten fingers is the last thing you want to do. String section? Not gonna sound right unless 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th violin parts are all played separately. Same for any other section. Even if you're not doing "symphon
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by Gary Chang
In a word, MIXOLATOR. gary --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "Rob" wrote: > Are there any? Maybe the Blacet Mixer-Processor? > > Thanks, > > Rob Adams
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by liquidcolor@earthlink.net
Yes, the Blacet mixer processor will invert cv. As for Wiard, the Mixolator will also invert cv. On Jun 26, 2004, at 9:16 PM, Rob wrote: > Are there any? Maybe the Blacet Mixer-Processor? > > Thanks, > > Rob Adams > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-27 by drmabuce
Hi Gary First off, The June posts on this group contain such a terrific `sign= al-to-noise' ratio that I have to double-check to make sure this is REALLY t= he internet on my screen! Many thanks to ALL of you for providing hard evide= nce that refutes my theory that the web (led
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-26 by Gary Chang
> > The reason I asked why you would use a Buchla is that I know and > > know of several people who do what you do---NONE of them use analog > > except for window dressing to impress clients. Time is money. Who > > has the time to diddle with patches and record monophonically whe
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-26 by Rob
Are there any? Maybe the Blacet Mixer-Processor? Thanks, Rob Adams
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-26 by konkuro
I wrote: >>Even a PAIA 2700 oscillator can be used accurately with a sequencer, as each note is individually set. I don't understand that logic. Konkuro, from your comments about dance music and the Buchla (which you've never used) I really don't think you know what you're talkin
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-26 by konkuro
Paul wrote: >there is nothing more disheartening than to have total strangers post whatever comes into their heads in public Internet groups about your stuff. Especially if they don't *own* any. We all dream of having a 'real' company, where there are say 4 assemblers, a material
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-26 by Chris Whitten
Interesting comments Les. They mirror my experiences. > Sure, you could plop all ten fingers down on preset #27 and let the > resulting pad morph away for 30 seconds and "that's good enough for this > scene, let's move on" but what you just did sounds just like 1273 other > folks
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-26 by Chris Whitten
> The reason I asked why you would use a Buchla is that I know and > know of several people who do what you do---NONE of them use analog > except for window dressing to impress clients. Time is money. Who > has the time to diddle with patches and record monophonically when > you
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-26 by Les Mizzell
> Time is money. Who > has the time to diddle with patches and record monophonically when > you can push a button and play with all ten fingers? Ooo...I could go on and on about this one... If you're doing any type symphonic simulations, playing with all ten fingers is the last t
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-26 by Chris Whitten
>If you are referring to the 258 oscillators, I can see > that they are hard to get to track together, because they only have > variable scale CV inputs, but it is possible. In fact I'm using 258 Oscillators with NO PROBLEMS whatsoever. As I've stated before, I can position tunin
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-26 by konkuro
Gino wrote: >My point is, try using the Buchla to create equally tempered "traditional" music. It's entirely within the realm of possibility. Yes it was designed by and for people looking for new means of expression. But once you get your hands dirty with one, it's goes nearly an
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-26 by konkuro
Greetings from L.A.! Been driving all day. :-P Chris wrote: >I could go on, but why bore everyone?
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-26 by Paul Schreiber
Here are important lessons I think both Grant & I have learned (still learning?) from the last couple of years. 1) there is nothing more rewarding than to have somebody you know and respect (Gary Chang/Robert Rich) not only *say* they like your modules, but actually *use* them in
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-25 by Chris Whitten
> Are you using > your Buchla to play melodies with a keyboard? Yes, the touchplate style keyboard. >Are you multitracking > such melodies? Sometimes. Why not? > Please don't take this the wrong way, but why are you using an analog > for that kind of work? I don't see how that ca
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-25 by Robair, Gino
Everyone on the list is familiar with your background by now, Konkuro, and I'm certainly not trying to say you don't know what you're talking about in terms of synthesis overall.. My point is, try using the Buchla to create equally tempered "traditional" music. It's entirely with
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-25 by Robair, Gino
The Hans Reichel CD on Rastascan is particularly good and features the daxophone: http://www.rastascan.com/catalog/brd016.html :-) g. > ---------- > From: Les Mizzell > Reply To: wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 11:00 AM > To: wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com >
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-06-25 by verbos2002
--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "konkuro" wrote: > Chris wrote: > > >As I said, I'm using Buchla modules constantly for mainstream > melodic parts in television music scores. I've found the Buchla > Oscillators have tremendous low end for dance music and/or Drum n > Bass type
Thread view
Attachments: 0