Re: panel visibility
1999-05-04 by J. Larry Hendry
... thin ... them. ... It ... Dave, I have been thinking about this myself quite a bit. More than any reason, because I really like that look that you get
Messages
Browse messages
Page 682 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-04 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
Hi Paul: I can t decide which is better (2U or 1U). I was thinking that maybe you could make one PCB for both configurations with two different: panels,
Re: Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-03 by Paul Schreiber
Well, the early voting favored the 1U, but the 2U faction has come on strong! Actually, a 2U is looking better since originally I thought I could fit all of
Re: Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-03 by mmt
Hello All, I like the idea of a the 2 space LFO, because of the added features. I d probably buy both types though. My concern is about the LED design. If a
Re: panel visibility
1999-05-03 by Tentochi
I like the idea of doing a rectangle around near the outside of the panel. The line would be fairly thick and have rounded corners. --Todd
panel visibility
1999-05-03 by Dave Bradley
I have noticed that sometimes in low light conditions, my eyes get fooled when looking at MOTM panels. It becomes hard to visually group knobs together into a
Re: Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-03 by gjalass@xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
I tend to vote for a 2U-width type of LFO because : - a Sync-Input is quite benificial ( for those delayed vibrato type of modulations ) - CV inputs without an
Re: Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-03 by Dave Bradley
I would want both designs. Very slow cycle times are important to me, and simultaneous outputs, but I d have a place in my system for a couple of the simple
Re: Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-03 by Paul Schreiber
... That s because *I* get all of my modules for free....YOU have to pay for them. Why not them pay for what you want?? Plus usually we are in agreement, or in
Re: Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-03 by improv@xxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Like most other people here, I m sure I d build whatever you design, but I guess I d prefer the 1U model, given that I d probably want at least a couple of
Re: Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-03 by Tentochi
I am still not good with describing and understanding everything. Is it possible to sync the LFO with other things? Is it possible to vary the amount of
VCLFO Part #2
1999-05-02 by Paul Schreiber
Things I missed: a) the TRI out is unaffected by SHAPE, it s always a TRI. The RAMP at 50% *is* a TRI as well. On either side, it approaches SAWtooth. b) I
Re: VCLFO Part #2
1999-05-02 by J. Larry Hendry
... OK, that makes sense to even me. ... from 2 ... I agree. I would rather have two separate units (whether 1 or 2 space) than a dual LFO if the cost is
Re: Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-02 by J. Larry Hendry
I vote for single space $99 kit. However, as always, I will buy which ever one you make. Larry Hendry ... 1U, ... simultaneously. ... at
Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-02 by Paul Schreiber
On paper I have the VCLFO designed. *Curently*, it is designed to be a 1U, single VCLFO as follows: 4 controls ... Initial Speed (from about 1 cylce in 20
Assembled MOTM's for Sale!
1999-05-01 by Steve
I have the following MOTM modules for sale. This is because of a personal situation and has nothing to do with MOTM. I love the damn thing, it is just the
Re: VCO's are on the verge......
1999-04-29 by Dave Bradley
Congrats! I was going to mention removing the Available March 15 from the website but you are ahead of me. Will you be updating the News page also? Dave
Re: VCO's are on the verge......
1999-04-29 by CHRIS PARKER
Great news Paul! Have the Kenton Pro-2000s come in yet and, if so, will they be shipped with the VCOs? ... From: Paul Schreiber Good
VCO's are on the verge......
1999-04-29 by Paul Schreiber
Good news! Unless a giant hailstorm hits again on Friday (3 years ago we had 90MPH winds & softball hail!) the VCOs are shipping. I am tweaking the manual,
Re: What next?
1999-04-28 by Paul Schreiber
The panel will have actual gain setting, not just a scale . Paul S. ... From: Dave Bradley To: motm@onelist.com Date:
Re: What next?
1999-04-28 by Dave Bradley
Sounds even better! Not just different numbers on the panel, but the ability to provide gain to the signal as well as attenuation. Dave Bradley Principal
Re: What next?
1999-04-28 by J. Larry Hendry
... Sure, same concept, just different numbers. It was the concept I was making sure I was properly attached to. Sounds great !! Larry
Re: What next?
1999-04-27 by Paul Schreiber
I was thinking -2 to left, +2 to right, zero in the middle. This copies Moog s modular design. Paul S. ... From: Dave Bradley To:
Re: What next?
1999-04-27 by Dave Bradley
... Yep. Gain x input voltage = output voltage, so zero gain equates to zero output. Typically, you want to swing from full reversed polarity down to zero and
Re: What next?
1999-04-27 by J. Larry Hendry
OH. I like the sound of that. (+ and - 5 volt scales like the MOTM-700) Do you mean zero output at 12 o clock? LH
Re: What next?
1999-04-27 by Dave Bradley
May I suggest: Zero gain = 12:00 unity gain inverted = full left unity gain noninverted = full right Dave Bradley Principal Software Engineer Engineering
Re: What next?
1999-04-27 by J. Larry Hendry
... So, since this is an attenuator will 10 on the knob be unison voltage in-to-out just inverted? LH
Re: What next?
1999-04-27 by Paul Schreiber
No, it s a 1U wide module with 3 pots and 6 jacks. Cheap! Paul S. ... From: J. Larry Hendry To: motm@onelist.com Date:
Re: What next?
1999-04-27 by J. Larry Hendry
... Oh goodie. Will the reversing attenuator have both reversed and non-reversed outputs? Larry H
Re: What next?
1999-04-27 by Paul Schreiber
I would say the MS-20 filter is about 4 weeks away, the PS-3100 about 6 weeks away. The mixer about 4 weeks away, along with a dual pre-amp and a triple
What next?
1999-04-27 by Dave Bradley
Boy, it sure is quiet on this list as we all wait with baited breath for our VCOs. ANYBODY OUT THERE? Actually, being a greedy sort, I wanted to ask Paul what
VCO Update
1999-04-22 by Paul Schreiber
Just taking a break from stuffing parts into little plastic bags. The aforementioned stuffing of parts into little plastic bags is taking longer than expected.
Re: Saturday night fever
1999-04-18 by J. Larry Hendry
Way to go Paul !!! Larry (drooling and waiting for VCOs). Got so desparate I bought a Hammond Tonewheel organ today. Talk about tracking. I only did
Saturday night fever
1999-04-18 by Paul Schreiber
Well, after hunting down an obsure issue with the VCO (too little reference current for the expo. pair) I got the new pcbs all running 100%. Using a Kenton
Re: skb case?
1999-04-17 by Paul Schreiber
Well, I m trying to get them cheaper. Will let you know in about 2 weeks. Hold off until then. Paul S. ... From: intents To: motm
skb case?
1999-04-17 by intents
so there is a rumor on the analogue heaven mailing list that paul is going to offer skb pop-up mixer cases soon..... true? should i wait for it or go buy the
Re: Hey Paul
1999-04-16 by J. Larry Hendry
... Oh yeah! One of your real jobs. Got to keep that bread on the table . ... and ... Better? They must be great! I didn t see anything woring with the
Re: Hey Paul
1999-04-16 by Paul Schreiber
Probably starting Tuesday. I had to get DSP interface cards to Texas Instruments this week. BUT...the new pcbs look great (changed vendors). All the parts are
Hey Paul
1999-04-16 by J. Larry Hendry
VCOs shipping soon? Just paid my taxes and need some good news. LH
my new e-mail addres
1999-04-13 by Gur Milstein
my new e-mail addres is: gur_mil@mail.netvision.net.il thanx Gur Milstein
Re: MOTM review at Synthsite
1999-04-13 by J. Larry Hendry
... recently ... Thanks Chris. I think I ll try the poke it again JB method once more. Hey! Good education leads to good career, leads to LOTs of MOTM. In
Re: MOTM review at Synthsite
1999-04-13 by J. Larry Hendry
... attempt) ... I actually was able to get it to copy to the window. Go figure. ... player. ... You have a good point there. Sometimes brute force IS the
Re: MOTM review at Synthsite
1999-04-13 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
... I actually quit playing the drums when I was fourteen because I had no idea how to play in 5 and 7 -- hey Larry, the truth hurts! ... All seriousness
Re: MOTM review at Synthsite
1999-04-13 by Christopher Jeris
Everyone that s having trouble posting Synthsite reviews -- It might not be your fault. I ve gotten some seriously garbled HTML from them recently (I m using
Re: MOTM review at Synthsite
1999-04-13 by J. Larry Hendry
... player? ... isn t ... more, ... error ... Pentatonic would be FIVE John. But, I forgive your slight as I know guitar players can normally only count to 4
Re: MOTM review at Synthsite
1999-04-13 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
Hi Larry; guys: ... What s this? I ve been successful putting a review there? Me? A guitar player? You ve tried three times? One for every note of the
Re: Fw: [AH] MOTM review at Synthsite
1999-04-12 by J. Larry Hendry
... next ... OK. You guys that have been successful at putting review at this site. I have tried three times and cannot get it to work. I get the following
Fw: Schematics Archive
1999-04-12 by Paul Schreiber
It would be helpful if you would send MOTM reviews to this person. Paul S. ... From: Liverdrain To: synth-diy@mailhost.bpa.nl
PWR-30 cables
1999-04-11 by Paul Schreiber
Just in case you missed it: I have made up some 30 long power cables. They are PWR-30 @$9ea. If you want to order a module with these in place of the 20
VCO/VCF gentle reminder
1999-04-11 by Paul Schreiber
Just a reminder that the VCO & the upcoming filters *require* the use of heat sink compound, which is NOT